|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
yourout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 11:20 PM Original message |
A robust Public Option would take off like the Cash for Clunkers program and..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. We seem to be headed towards a lousy public option, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
targetpractice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think you are right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 11:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. DING! DING!.......Reagonomics was a Con, Is a Con, and will always be a Con. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-02-09 12:22 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Yep. And that is exactly what they do not want. First it's public option, then it's single payer, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-02-09 08:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. AMEN!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duke Newcombe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. It would also put to death the bulls*&t claim... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-02-09 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
5. IMO the 'public option' has ALWAYS been a back-door plan to get single payer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-02-09 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
6. Correct. It's all about votes. If we can connect with the poor whites, it's all over for them. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-02-09 05:53 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Which is exactly why they are the most uninformed.. It is by design. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-02-09 04:12 AM Response to Original message |
8. The key word here is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-02-09 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
11. how many teabaggers have participated in the Cash For Clunkers program? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC