Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Liz Cheney been tasked to take over Palin's space. Cut off her money tree and supporters before

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:35 AM
Original message
Has Liz Cheney been tasked to take over Palin's space. Cut off her money tree and supporters before
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 08:47 AM by CK_John
Palin gets a toe hole in national politics and make 2012 safe for a GOP comeback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. (Jeb) Bush/(Liz) Cheney 2012!
Edited on Tue Jul-14-09 09:10 AM by rocktivity
I can hear it now...

:boring:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. No.... She's been tasked to save her daddy's ass

I don't think she gives a damn about Palin.


You know, you really need to become familiar with Occam's Razor:


When competing hypotheses are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selection of the hypothesis that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities while still sufficiently answering the question. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood. To quote Isaac Newton: "We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes."<3>

To summarize the common understanding of the principle, “Of several acceptable explanations for a phenomenon, the simplest is preferable, provided that it takes all circumstances into account.”


Or to be it more bluntly:

The simplest explanation is usually the correct one.

(There's not a conspiracy behind everything)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank you kind sir/madam for your brilliance and sharing of same. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. She scares me more than that Palin woman does ..... in more ways than one. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC