Hey CNN, Republicans who disagree with Obama is hardly "Breaking News"

[ericgtr]

I got a good laugh out of their headline that Republican war mongers think Obama needs to take a stronger stance on Iran.

For the record, I have never been more proud of Obama. This is exactly how we should be dealing with militant "death to America" countries, simply don't give them any ammo and their people realize it.

The Republicans would've gone in there and threatened them with war if they don't adopt our way of thinking.

[rocktivity]

1. When you say you've "never been more proud of Obama"

do you mean generally, or just in your adult life?

:silly:
rocktivity

[DesertFlower]

2. i was shocked when pat

buchanan agreed with obama the other day.

[givemebackmycountry]

3. Bush (The Monkey) would have planted his dumb ass in front of a CNN camera...

And reminded everyone how "evil" Iran was.
"Evil" as in "axis of evil" evil.

He would have called them "murders" and "anti-Democratic" and then he would have threatened them with force.
One thing you could say about The Monkey and the Repukes when they were in charge, was that they had an uncanny ability to say the wrong thing, at the wrong time, and then criticize everyone who didn't agree with them.

That the Monkey would then say something patently fucking stupid was just icing on the right-wing version of cake.

Remember what you told us Repukes?
We are in charge now so sit down and shut the fuck up.
And no, OUR President is not about to do or say something stupid and provocative like your guy did.

We are so much smarter than you so BUT OUT.

Go read your freaking bible or Ayn Rand or something.

[pdxmom]

4. Yes, they keep talking about "some Republicans" that think Obama

is weak. But they leave out two pieces of information. One, that there are a number of Republicans,like Kissinger, who think Obama has handled this exactly right. And two, that all those Repukes that say he's weak are the same losers that got us into Iraq and were totally wrong about that, too.

Nice repoorting there, CNN. Losers.

[Life Long Dem]

5. I'm listening to the propaganda Fox is telling.

Mousavi bad. bad bad bad bad boy... haa haa!!

[ericgtr]

6. Are you serious, they prefer Ahmadickajad over Mousavi?

It wouldn't surprise me.

[Life Long Dem]

7. Neither, they are saying Mousavi can be worse.

They have to have the nuke-em leader who is bad to play their war.

[backscatter712]

8. The neocons did indeed root for Ahmadinthehead.

http://www.alternet.org/world/140707/why_u.s._neocons_want_ahmadinejad_to_win/

A popular, legitimate, peaceful Iran, that establishes bonds of friendship and diplomacy with the United States, is the worst nightmare for the neocons, who desperately need someone to demonize so as to justify the insane military presence in the Middle East. They need chaos in the region so they can jack up the price of oil and line their pockets at our expense.

[Arkana]

9. They want A-jad because they need a boogeyman.

The right wing--and Fox, in particular--needs a nutjob like A-jad in power so they can point to him and say "BOOGA BOOGA BOOGA! SEE?! SCARY BROWN MUSLIM PERSON! ALL MUSLIM PEOPLE ARE LIKE THIS! BE AFRAID!!!!"