Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Richard Lugar's response to my Health Care email..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:13 PM
Original message
Sen. Richard Lugar's response to my Health Care email..
Thank you for contacting me with your suggestions for health care reform. I share your interest in this important issue.

I agree with you that the availability of affordable health care is an issue of great importance to our nation. In particular, I believe that Congress must continue to address the long-term fiscal viability of three main entitlement programs: Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. As Richard Fisher, President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, noted in a May 29, 2008, speech: "Add together the unfunded liabilities from Medicare and Social Security, and it comes to $99.2 trillion over the infinite horizon."

Fisher and many fellow economists note that the majority of this liability is attributable to the Medicare and Medicaid programs mainly because spending for these programs, and across the health care sector generally, are rapidly outpacing the growth of inflation at a rate faster than Social Security. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that health care spending in both the public and private sectors composes 16 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP), or 2 trillion dollars, and is expected to rise to almost 50 percent of GDP over the next 75 years. Of that amount, Medicare and Medicaid spending alone constitutes 4 percent of GDP and is expected to grow to 20 percent by 2083.

There are a number of reasons for this spending growth. Much of it is due to years of increasing wealth in our country, which has enabled Americans to more easily afford cutting-edge medical procedures and drug therapies and has subsequently led to longer life expectancies. However, the growth is also a result of vast inefficiencies in our health care delivery system.

There is not a silver-bullet solution to reigning in the rising cost of health care. However, Congress must work to strike a better balance between encouragement of medical and pharmaceutical research and development and minimization of waste and errors in providing care, specifically in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

For example, Congressional health reform proposals could include increased utilization of health information technology (HIT), such as electronic databases, securitized online medical records, and telemedicine. HIT has the ability to reduce incidences of medical errors, streamline administrative paperwork, and prevent unnecessary repetition in services, all which drive up costs. HIT also has the ability to deliver better quality of care to patients who live in rural, medically under-served communities.

I will have your thoughts closely in mind as discussions on how best to reform our health care system continues in Congress. Thank you, again, for sharing your thoughts with me.



Sincerely,


Richard G. Lugar
United States Senator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. For the Republicans, its all about cost.....
Nothing about getting health care for people with no insurance. Nothing about why private insurance companies are involved in health decisions. Nothing about why private insurance companies need to get to skim 30% off the top of every health care dollar spent. Nothing about small businesses having to pay off insurance companies, just like the mafia, just to stay in business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Then Lugar should get behind single-payer, because it is actually the most cost effective
alternative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC