Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Bipartisanship" on health care = guaranteed failure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 10:44 PM
Original message
"Bipartisanship" on health care = guaranteed failure
It is entirely beside the point what the bill will look like. The Repukes will be against it. Any bill that a Repuke will vote for is a bill that will require us to pay for our own deaths, disabilities and bankruptcies.

In 1993 conservative pundit Irving Kristol advised the GOP that the Clinton proposal "should not be amended; it should be erased," because "it will revive the reputation of the party that spends and regulates, the Democrats, as the generous protector of middle-class interests.“

In 2008, the Cato Institute has stated that “blocking Obama's health plan is key to the GOP's survival. If Obama succeeds in passing health care, then people who might have been conservatives will like it, and will be more likely to vote for the people who passed it.“
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. “blocking Obama's health plan is key to the GOP's survival"


EXACTLY and they know it. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Which is why they should have made a big push for single payer, and then
made a big show of compromise and rammed through multipayer with a very strong and robust public option.

Instead they seem content to do PR reform and nothing substantial except public bail out for the insurance companies.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Replace Harry Reid with Barbara Boxer - Senate Leadership.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes! yes! yes!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Obama wouldn't let that happen
he needs Reid to hold off the liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. It does feel that way,
but I hope you are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which is why we have to get something through the Senate.
Even if it's only 70-75% of what we wanted, it would still do a lot of good and it'd drive the GOP even further into the woods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Everything is going as planned..........
the lobbyist own both houses and the white house. "Bipartisanship" is a bunch of fucking bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. The late George Carlin: "Any time I see the word 'bipartisan', it lets me know
that some larger-than-usual deception is afoot."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why would you believe that?
Just because our failure has been compounded every single year so far doesn't mean that more bipartisanship isn't the solution.

Right? Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC