Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stimulus Spending Overstated by Obama Officials

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:02 PM
Original message
Stimulus Spending Overstated by Obama Officials
When WH officials give misleading data--it does not signal change--just same ol, same ol.


http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/28/stimulus-spending-overstated-by-obama-officials/


May 28, 2009, 6:47 pm
Stimulus Spending Overstated by Obama Officials

By Michael Cooper

When the Obama administration issued its first quarterly report on the $787 billion stimulus package earlier this month, prompting questions about the rate of stimulus spending, it overstated how much money had been actually been spent by roughly a third.

The report said that “as of May 5, $28.5 billion had already been outlaid.’’ That figure included $11.5 billion in payments the Labor Department reported making to the unemployment trust fund. The Labor Department has now revised its figure, reporting that it has only actually paid $1.1 billion to the unemployment trust fund.

The adjustment appeared on the government’s stimulus Web site, http://www.recovery.gov, in the form of a May 21 footnote that said “Effective May 21, a Department of Labor accounting adjustment was made to reflect an $8.9 billion dollar reduction from the previously reported outlays (i.e.: paid out).” The $10.4 billion over-reported payment to the trust fund was partly offset by the department’s payments to other programs.

That would mean that the government had only actually spent between $18.1 billion and $19.6 billion of stimulus money when the quarterly report was issued...................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. i'm outraged i tell ya! outraged!!!!!11!11!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. great investigative piece.
all you have to do is wait for the white house to publicize corrections and then you can say you discovered something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. lol
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. They LIED!!!!!
How'd you find out? Um, they told us.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. this find was just like WMD
i mean the poster said "it's the same ol same ol" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, big brother is on DU. Have a good day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. do you understand anything about accounting? or economic numbers?
it is clear they will have to make end of quarter adjustments. that is common practice. So if they stated one number that was true on the books one day, they're supposed to be go back in time and revise their statement?

Come on. You're just searching. The stimulus is obviously working which is the real point of their original statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. Obama Lied! Spreadsheets Died!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. OMG! Another negative post by snowdays? I'm shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wowie.
An accounting error. Can he recover?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yeah. I just pointed that out above
doubt I'll get a response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. GOTCHA! GOTCHA!
Edited on Fri May-29-09 04:20 PM by Thrill
The fact that you're even getting any information is change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't know what to say!
Perhaps I'll try to shed a tear or something!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. What is "same ol same ol" is your
incessant pissant snide snarks on President Obama on one hand and effusive glowing reports on Hillary.

The Hillary reports are fine..Obama chose well but the primaries are over and your shit is getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Right on time-another negative thread by you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. At least the CBO didn't imply Pres. Obama was fudging the numbers like they did of Bubba in '99.
Edited on Fri May-29-09 06:44 PM by ClarkUSA
The Congressional Budget Office said today that President Clinton had grossly underestimated the cost of his proposal for Medicare coverage of prescription drugs.

Dan L. Crippen, director of the budget office, also told Congress that Mr. Clinton had overstated the savings that could be achieved by his proposals to redesign Medicare and encourage competition in the traditional fee-for-service program.

When Mr. Clinton unveiled his drug proposal on June 29, he said it would cost $118 billion over 10 years. The budget office says now that the cost would be $168 billion, 42 percent higher than Mr. Clinton's estimate.

The estimate of the budget office has many political ramifications. It will give Republicans a reason to support a much more limited Medicare drug benefit, as Congress is normally obliged to use the cost estimates from its own budget office.


Thank goodness "Obama officials" are so much more competent and timely about transparent self-correction than Clinton and BushCo officials! It seems you're wrong about "same ol, same ol" -- unless you were talking about yourself. :eyes:






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Gawd
Do you never get tired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. How did this thread even get 1 vote? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. 31 days 39 negative threads-and 1 positive thread about Hillary.
It's getting old. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. ABC:
Another Bitter Clinger

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. Impeach! Impeach! Impeach Obama RIGHT NOW!!1!1
He lied! Spreadsheets died!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. YES IT'S EXACTLY JUST LIKE IT WAS IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME OLD THING
PLEASE PUBLISH THAT IT'S THE SAME OLD SAME OLD ON 1000 MORE WEBSITES.

DO IT RIGHT NOW, OR ELSE YOU ARE JUST COVERING UP FOR THE SAME OLD SAME OLD!

PLEASE, WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR???

YOU STILL HAVEN'T DONE IT???

WHY ARE YOU WAITING??? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
24. Lolz ur report is teh fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
26. This is the FAILEST post ever to FAIL on DU
FAIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
27. You disrupt poorly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC