Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Mounts ("impassioned") Defense of Plans to Close Guantánamo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 10:49 PM
Original message
Obama Mounts ("impassioned") Defense of Plans to Close Guantánamo

Doug Mills/The New York Times
President Obama spoke at the National Archives building in Washington on Thursday.


WASHINGTON — Despite stiff resistance from Congress, President Obama said Thursday that he intended to transfer some detainees from Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to highly secure facilities inside the United States. He also proposed “prolonged detention” for terrorism suspects who cannot be tried, a problem he called “the toughest issue we face.”

In a speech at the National Archives here, Mr. Obama gave a full-throated defense of his antiterrorism policies and his commitment to closing the Guantánamo prison. With Republicans painting him as weak on terror, and Democrats increasingly nervous about transferring terrorism suspects to the United States, the White House sought to reclaim a debate over which even some of his allies said he had lost control.

“We are not going to release anyone if it would endanger our national security,” Mr. Obama declared, adding, “As we make these decisions, bear in mind the following fact: Nobody has ever escaped from one of our federal supermax prisons, which hold hundreds of convicted terrorists.”

In describing his plans for the roughly 240 terrorism suspects still held at Guantánamo Bay, Mr. Obama accused his predecessor, George W. Bush, of having embarked on “a misguided experiment” that resulted in “a mess.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/22/us/politics/22obama.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Check out the Founding Father (aka Great White Man) fourth from the left...
Edited on Thu May-21-09 11:06 PM by Clio the Leo
.... up there in that painting.

Seems to be looking down on #44 rather impressed with what he just heard.



I know, reading too much in to it ..... but it's art ...... it's subjective. :)

(who is that guy I wonder? ..... I'm gonna go with Jefferson.... I think it's Jefferson.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. ... ah, it's James Wilson.....
Edited on Thu May-21-09 11:05 PM by Clio the Leo
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/convention/faulkner/

And coincidentally, the painter's name is "Barry." :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Or is it John Rutledge?
It's hard to see but there are three tightly crowded together at the far right.

The Constitution Mural, Painted by: Barry Faulkner in 1936

From left to right: (Front Row) Edmund Randolph, Nathaniel Gorham, John Dickinson, John
Rutledge, James Wilson, Oliver Ellsworth, Charles Pinckney, James Madison, Elbridge Gerry,
William Samuel Johnson, George Mason, George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Rufus King,
William Paterson, Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, Gouverneur Morris,
Alexander Hamilton, George Read.
(Back Row) William R. Davie, John Langdon, Luther Martin, Roger Sherman,
Gunning Bedford, Jr., and Abraham Baldwin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Whoops, I forgot the link...
.... this page has a mouse over thingy that says it's Wilson.

http://teachingamericanhistory.org/convention/faulkner/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. 'Impassioned?'
SCHOLARLY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Doing this is sure turning out to be a pain in the ass
If closing a single prison that houses less than 300 people is this cumbersome, I can't imagine how hard it will be to get health care done or DADT repealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's the whole point. I think people don't really "get" how many problems he faces.
There's a "mess" as O said in the White House he has to deal with it every day because it's a big mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC