Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Allstate turns down government bailout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 04:31 PM
Original message
Allstate turns down government bailout
Allstate Corp. became the second insurer today to turn down a bailout from the Treasury Department after being approved for government funding .

The property and casualty insurer said it has strong capital and liquidity positions.

The Northbrook, Ill.-based company was among six insurers approved by the Treasury to receive government aid. On Friday, financial adviser Ameriprise Financial Inc. also turned down bailout funding.

Allstate said it had $12.2 billion of equity and $23.1 billion of cash or liquid assets in its investment portfolio as of March 31. It has since bolstered its finances with a $1 billion debt offering, and its securities holdings gained more than $1.5 billion in value from the end of the first quarter through May 13, the company said.

“Given Allstate’s strong capital and liquidity positions ... we will not participate in this program,” said Chief Executive Thomas Wilson in a prepared statement today.

Last week, the federal government agreed to extend billions of bailout funds to six major life insurers, including Allstate, helping them shore up their capital positions in the wake of major investment losses....

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/biz/6431034.html



How did they magically get into "strong capital and liquidity positions" so quickly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probably because an aider and abettor is no longer occupying the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. They probably have bets with a hedge fund that they go bankrupt. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newinnm Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who cares why..
At least they the taxpayer wont be funding a private business.


nnnm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC