Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Obama cruises where Bill Clinton stumbled.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:48 PM
Original message
Why Obama cruises where Bill Clinton stumbled.
Edited on Fri May-01-09 04:53 PM by denem
Obama Gets High Marks From Clinton Administration Veterans

Veterans of President Bill Clinton's administration say there are several reasons why Barack Obama has gotten off to a better start than their former boss.

First, Obama is more disciplined and efficient in making decisions and delegating responsibility than Clinton was back in 1993, when the last Democratic presidency got started, making for a smoother operation at the White House.

Second, the Clinton veterans, some of whom are currently working for Obama, say senior people in the administration coordinate constantly with each other, which sometimes didn't happen under Clinton.

Third, Clinton aides would frequently get into arguments about the timing of policy initiatives. "Today, we don't fight about sequencing" because Obama wants to do so many things at once, says a former Clinton aide who is now on Obama's team.

Another big difference is that the Obama team is more experienced in Washington and more mature than Clinton's team was, Clinton veterans say.

Many White House insiders add that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, a former Clinton adviser and an ex-congressman from Chicago, is a big reason for the improvement. "Having Rahm there makes a huge difference," says a former top Clinton aide. "He has very good relations with Congress. He knows how to navigate Capitol Hill." By contrast, Clinton and his first chief of staff, Mack McLarty, had to learn that for themselves.

http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/obama/2009/05/01/obama-gets-high-marks-from-clinton-administration-veterans.html

I would add that the Obama Administration knew what was coming. The Clinton Admin. may have assumed a measure of good will from Republicans, and outside the beltway. Obama, for all his talk of bi/post partisanship made no such mistake.

After eight years, Clinton veterans had a pretty good idea of Republican tactics, and must be amused/bemused that the GOP hasn't learned any new tricks.

Finally, Rahm knows the House, but the VP has a pretty fair knowledge of the senate ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup. That old quality, experience, does work, and there's only one way to get it
Bush appointed hundreds of people, like 'heck of a job Brownie' who had no experience. We've seen how that worked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Without the Clinton Administration,
Obama would be relying on Carter Admin veterans for experience. Not Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Things would look very different from out here without the experienced staff
They've made President Obama look like a duck taking to water. Of course he has his Senate experience too, and I'm sure he did a lot of networking because that's his style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Exactly. They weren't an option for Bubba. Other than Warren Christopher. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. And I am grateful for the Clinton admin. as a result.
Good people some of whom were somewhat wasted in the Clinton years because of Clinton's own personal indiscretions (I am not morally against him but his actions did cause us Dems to lose our power and effectiveness).

Now we have a great president who effectively leads. This is refreshing. I am hopeful for the first time in a long, long time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. What makes me chuckle
is that all those folks who squawked during the transition about guys like Rahm Emanuel not being "CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN!!!!" are oddly silent about this.

I knew that Rahm's fighting spirit was one of the main reasons he was chosen as chief of staff--you have to have someone who can run a tight ship in the White House, navigate Capitol Hill successfully, and get the requisite number of votes for your boss's policy initiatives.

It helps that Biden's got 30 years of Senate experience and some invaluable friendships on the Hill, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Change is a Direction. Rahm is a man who can get things done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course he gets high marks from Clinton Administration veterans.
He hired half of them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But only they are in a position to compare the inner working
of Government and the first 100 days ipso facto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Having them there helps avoid the mistakes of inexperience, such as get an attack dog as CoStaff. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. And, that's why I
like Rahm and since he and Dean buried the so-called hatchet I like him even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. In 1992 Republicans had won 5 of the last 7 presidential elections
Edited on Fri May-01-09 05:22 PM by tritsofme
In the previous 25 years there had only been a single one term Democratic president.

On many things, he was starting out from scratch. Obama greatly benefits from all of the Clinton veterans he has at his disposal.

Clinton also found himself an outsider in Washington, whereas Obama spent 6 years in the US Senate, building relationships with the legislators he will need to advance his agenda.

And Rahm really is just great at what he does, all of the whiners can shove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Republicans gained congressional seats the year Clinton was first elected. BHO not in Sen. for 6yrs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Actually, Senate Dems picked up a seat (57 D to 43 R) when Clinton took office, but
by two years later the Dems lost nine seats (48 D to 53 R).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Pres. Obama's organizational skills are second to none. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Pfffft
He can't hold a candle to mine....



:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. File this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Keeps his pants zipped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. I think Michelle would probably cut it off if he didn't.
Barack doesn't strike me as the type to cheat on his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. He's got more brains than that.
Would YOU cheat on Michelle? Anybody short of Catherine Zeta-Jone swould be trading DOWN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Perhaps Obama hiring some former Clinton officials was not so bad after all
Experience is good.
I also remember the days of poor Mack McLarty trying to navigate Washington, he had a bit of a tough time though he seemed like a nice guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. COMMUNITY ORGANIZER
.......with RESPONSIBLITIES, baby!!!! :fistbump:

Palin won't be able to use that line against him again!!!! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. "Rahm Emanuel - a big reason for the improvement."
Rahmbo!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. President Obama mostly uses history as it was intended to learn from mistakes of the past.>
Edited on Fri May-01-09 08:52 PM by cooolandrew
Bill Clinton was a good guy not as aware how bad his adversories were. President Obama has consulted and took consel and perfected the formula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
25. Pres. Obama doesn't have Bill's need to be loved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC