Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"No attacks since 9-11" ARRRGGGHH! Will it ever DIE?!?!?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 01:36 PM
Original message
"No attacks since 9-11" ARRRGGGHH! Will it ever DIE?!?!?!
It's back again. Because we tortured, we "prevented another attack for 7 years".

IT'S A NON-ACCOMPLISHMENT, for God's sake!

EVERY President can say this. Clinton prevented "another attack" on the US after the first WTC attack--also "7 years".

Why don't liberals PUT A NAIL in this "no second attack" nonsense by Bush/Republicans??

(BTW: Clinton and all other presidents before him kept America SAFER than Bush....WITHOUT torture.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tell them that you can't prove a negative ... + ask why Bush/Cheney ignored the PDB 6 Aug 01
entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the US?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Ed Schultz did a good segment on this a few days ago ...
He went after Darth Cheney saying, "Hey, Dick -- you were
IN those intelligence meetings, you got those daily briefs,
like the one on August 6. You had people like Richard
Clarke wanting to meet on the terrorist threat, but YOU
DIDN'T DO ANYTHING!" They shouldn't be able to get away
with "it was so early in our tenure so we can't be blamed"
bullshit -- they had briefings from the Clinton people and
ongoing intelligence for 9 MONTHS and yet couldn't scramble
jets to intercept 4 HIJACKED AIRLINERS? This should be
NAILED TO THEM at every opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are they also giving Obama credit for his first 3 months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RT Atlanta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. what about the anthrax attacks?
Those attacks always get flushed down the toilet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Those have been concluded to have been against Democrats so no murkins were threatened
only soulless commie fascists. Prolly some hero trying to save the nation from satan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. republicans are soooo desperate.
hannity is still ranting about rev. wright and bill ayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. "No attacks since 9-11" ... so what? 9-11 wasn't enough?
They act like it's a huge accomplishment - "we've kept you safe since 9-11" - but they completely ignore the fact that 9-11 happened on their watch and they DIDN'T keep us safe! "We allowed the worst terrorist attack on American soil ever, but we kept you safe after that." Thanks ... I'm sure the families of the 3000 victims are very impressed! :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
33. EXACTLY!!!!
I'd K & R your response if I could but I've been feeling the same exact way for the longest of time and I am simply baffled as to why NOBODY AFAIK out on the airwaves or in Congress has ever mentioned this. I would think that this would STFU anybody repeating this completely idiotic meme that COMPLETELY ignores the following facts:

1.) 9/11 DID happen
2.) +/-3,000 people died directly or indirectly as a result of the attacks
3.) George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were President and Vice-President, respectively, of our country at that time.
4.) The Bush (mis-)administration received briefings from outgoing Clinton officials about terrorism, particularly in regards to Al-Queda.
5.) Intelligence agencies, Richard Clarke, George Tenet, et. al were reporting increased concerns about Al-Queda attacking inside the US and prepared and submitted a PDB entitled "Bin Laden Determined To Strike in US" detailing concerns about Al Queda targeting/hijacking airlines.
6.) There were apparently no reported and/or documented efforts by the Bush (mis-)administration to respond to the PDB other than (as reported by Ron Suskind) assuring the CIA that they "covered their asses".
7.) Bush sat in the classroom for 7 minutes doing..........???????? before leaving to address the unfolding situation on 9/11/01.

Of course, I'm afraid that repeating the aforementioned meme is actually SUPPOSED to make the rest of us completely forget/ignore the above facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. The Titanic only sunk once
Custer only fought at Little Big Horn once
The Exxon Valdez only went aground the one time

The point being, if you screw up bad-enough the first time, you don't get credit for not screwing up again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Right
And, as others have pointed out, we DID, in fact, have another attack following 9/11, specifically the Anthrax attacks- that appear to have been aimed at (Democratic) politicians among others- which claimed about a dozen (?) lives. I know that Bushco, after seven years, claimed to have found the guy responsible but there apparently were still a lot of doubts and unanswered questions about their findings.
And, although not technically an "attack" against us "on our soil", Bush sent 4,000+ of our troops/military personnel to their deaths in Iraq for.......................????? We still don't know for sure and may never, unfortunately, but it couldn't have been for anything good or worthwhile for anybody, most of all the Iraqis.
What about Katrina? It was an environmental disaster that claimed a lot of lives, some of whom could have been saved even though he nor anybody else certainly could not have prevented it. He could have, of course, done more to prepare/respond to it and his (mis-)administration's mismanagement of FEMA certainly contributed to at least some of the deaths.
Geez, that was kind of a "pattern" during his (mis-)administration, wasn't it? So, going to the tally board, we lost at least 7,000+ people during his (mis-) administration due to Bush's lack of concern/inattention to possible terrorist threats to our country, sheer recklessness in invading/occupying another country, and a disastrous lack of preparedness/responsiveness to natural disasters.

So, yay!!! No more terrorist attacks "on American soil!" Ummm......sure....whatever. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. I like to point out ...
There was a HUGE attack on 9-11 that Bush/Cheney failed to prevent ...

It is THEIR badge of dishonor .... THEIR shame ....

There is no evidence whatsoever that these violent interrogations did anything to prevent events that might have been prevented with other, less vicious tactics ....

it is just more rhetorical bullshit that somehow lingers in the body politic ....

The fact of 9-11 is enough to condemn the presidency of George W. Bush and his sidekick, Dick ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Say, "Yeah and the worst attack to ever happen to us was under Bush too"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Their response is
Clinton gutted the military, and Clinton also missed getting Osama bin Laden. I'm waiting for a real investigation of 9/11 so they can all eat crow because Bush/Cheney did 9/11. If the detainees ever get to testify about their guilt on 9/11 the evidence won't be there that the detainees had any part in it. We need real evidence like phone records, eyewitnesses, real video of that day including another angle of the Pentagon. The detainees should get the same kind of trial we would get and want. They should have defense attorneys that can look at ALL of the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. No attacks since Jan 20, 2009.
I feel your frustration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do they not remember the anthrax attacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
life_long_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. * and crashcart didn't keep people safe from the Beltway sniper:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_sniper_attacks

The Beltway sniper attacks took place during three weeks in October 2002 in Washington, D.C. (the target), Maryland, and Virginia. Eleven people were killed and three others critically injured in various locations throughout the Washington Metropolitan Area and along Interstate 95 in Virginia. It was widely speculated that a single sniper was using the Capital Beltway for travel, possibly in a white van or truck. It was later learned that the rampage was perpetrated by one man, John Allen Muhammad and one minor Lee Boyd Malvo, driving a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, and had apparently begun the month before with murders and robbery in Louisiana and Alabama, which had resulted in three deaths.<1>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaplainM Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. No Nazi invasions of France since May, 1940. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because one of the classic Republican tactics
is to simply keep repeating the your point over and over and over, as loudly and repetitively as you can, no matter how absurd insane or ridiculous it is.

And why do they keep using this tactic? Because it usually works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. And why do they keep using this tactic?
Because no one counters it. Democratic pundits and leaders have sat silent time after time while Republicans spout this absurd statement. Not one has ever pointed out, as the OP has, that Clinton also kept the country safe for 7 years, put the bad guys in prison and actually foiled verifiable subsequent plots. All while the Republicans made his life hell on earth. And then Bush ignored all warnings and allowed the worst attack on the U.S. mainland in modern history.

The Democrats need to learn how to counter Republican talking points immediately and every single time they are uttered. They also need to pick up on the talking point for the day and start slamming the "media" for using or repeating them. They are fairly easy to pick up on after the 1st hour or so of daily cable programming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lxlxlxl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Madrid, London, Mumbai, Islamabad, Bagdhad, Morocco...
Its not only a non-accomplishment, but if Cheney and Bush had stopped another attack here, but provoked attacks in the REST OF THE WORLD as a result...then can they really defend their 'success'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. There have been plenty of terror attacks since 9-11
Ask the family of any LGBT who's been killed or attacked by groups of people simply because of their orientation

Ask the Jewish students who've had their buildings defaced with slurs and propoganda

Ask the African American and Latino families who've talked down to, spit upon, incarcerated, deported or attacked - simply because of the color of their skin.

All of these groups of people have witnessed or been involved with 'terror' attacks weekly, every week since 9-11 - just as they were before.

Terrorism is, most simply, policy intended to intimidate or cause terror.<1> It is more commonly understood as an act which (1) is intended to create fear (terror), (2) is perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a materialistic goal or a lone attack), and (3) deliberately targets (or disregards the safety of) non-combatants.

Terrorism has been practiced by a broad array of political organizations for furthering their objectives. It has been practiced by both right-wing and left-wing political parties, nationalistic groups, religious groups, revolutionaries, and ruling governments.<7>


All too often, we forget and allow the GOP and their lapdogs in the media to frame "terrorists" as those scary brown people from somewhere else. But today, just like yesterday and the day before that - there are plenty of attacks in this country designed to put terror into the hearts of other members of their community. And that is the fight we constantly have to fight until the battles are done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Ask them to prove
that anything Bush/Cheney did over the past 8 years had anything to do with it.

It is the terrorists who decide when and where they are going to make a move. To wit, between the World Trade Center bombing in 1993 and 9/11/01 a period of, let's see, EIGHT years elapsed. Should we thank Bush/Cheney for that, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why did Bush SIT STOCK STILL after hearing, "America is under attack"??? ASK THAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. It was none of his doing...
Bush broke the world... financially, academically, militarily, and diplomatically.

That we weren't attacked during his watch FOR A SECOND TIME is nothing short of a miracle... and W doesn't do miracles... and this has nothing to do with anything he did or didn't do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwcwmack Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. well...
it's not that simple.

Because WHEN the next attack happens... and that could be soon or in the distant future and WHOEVER the POTUS is, he/she will be HAMMERED HARD.

We all appreciate the fact that we weren't attacked after 9-11... if Gore were teh POTUS we'd be praising him for his "keeping us safe" for 7 years...

Problem is, to achieve this end, the means were...

well you all know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. That's because there was no accountability for 9/11.
The Bush Admin epic incompetence was simply accepted and the wingnuts pretend his term started 9/12/01.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. "the wingnuts pretend his term started 9/12/01" - Yep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. There were plenty of attacks on American Citizens since 9-11
For one, last time I checked the 5000 Americans who died in Iraq were American citizens (mostly some non-citizens do serve).

I believe this economic attack we are under by the wealthy has actually cost more lives, caused more hardship, and caused more misery on my fellow countrymen than Osama could ever dream of :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. Too bad they didn't listen to Clinton Admin's warning then they could
claim that there wasn't one from 1-20-01 would've been a perfect record but for that pesky 9-11. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. DC Sniper was not a terrorist attack?
So now the GOP; Gonads On Pussies (of course totally useless) can claim what is or is not a terrorist attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. One-more-time! The DC Sniper doesn't count ?
Oct 21, 2008 ... D.C. Sniper: 23 Days of Fear (AKA 'Sniper: 23 Days of Fear in Washington D.C.')

Any torture apologist who says we succeeded in stopping attacks snce 9-11 are apologetic GOP liars. STFU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's also a fucking lie. Several people died from the anthrax attacks. After 9*11. bush never found
Edited on Sun Apr-26-09 10:16 PM by Skip Intro
those perps either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. Over the exact time period there have also been no Yeti sightings in
Cadiz, Indiana.

A coincidence? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
30. I just tell them the following
1. After the World Trade Center Bombings the only attacks on US Soil were by white-male, right-wingers protesting against the US becoming a Socialist nation.

2. We sent hundreds of thousands of US men and women over to Iraq for them to shoot at. Why would they bother to fly over here, when they can car-pool from the Afghan-Pakistan borders over to Iraq and shoot Americans there.
It's not like these guys are concerned about 'frequent-flyer miles'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
31. Since WWII, the Japanese have not attacked Pearl Harbor...
The Germans have not invaded Poland, the Italians have left Ethiopia alone...and amzingly, since the Great Wall of China was put up, the Mongols have left China alone!

Next we shall hear that since the Lunar Landings, aliens have been kept at bay by our technological advantage...:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
32. No terrorist attacks on US soil, that's true. But the last time I checked, Spain, England...
Edited on Mon Apr-27-09 08:19 AM by SKKY
...Turkey, Indonesia, Morocco, and Israel are our allies. Do they not count? That seems like a very, very short-sighted assessment of the success of our terrorism policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
35. They haven't needed a 2nd attack...
We've been crumbling since the first one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC