Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Reich: A Report Card on Obamanomics, Approaching One Hundred Days

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:43 PM
Original message
Robert Reich: A Report Card on Obamanomics, Approaching One Hundred Days
TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 2009

A Report Card on Obamanomics, Approaching One Hundred Days

The Administration is coming up to that magical 100-day mark, at which point measures are taken of how a new president is doing. As a university professor I'm accustomed to giving grades. So here's my report card on Obamanomics so far:

The 10-year budget gets an A. It's an extraordinary vision of what America can and should become, including universal health insurance and environmental protections against climate change. And the budget takes a little bit more from the rich and gives a little bit more back to the poor and lower middle class, which seems appropriate given that the income gap is wider than it's been since the 1920s. I'd give the budget an A plus except for its far-too-rosy economic projections.

The stimulus package gets a B. Good as far as it goes but doesn't go nearly far enough. $787 billion over two years sounds like a lot of stimulus. But the economy is operating at about a trillion and a half dollars below its capacity this year alone. And considering that the states are cutting services and increasing taxes to the tune of $350 billion over this year and next, the stimulus is even smaller.

The last grade is for the bank bailouts. I give them an F. I'm a big fan of this administration, but I've got to be honest. The bailouts are failing. So far American taxpayers have shoveled out almost $600 billion. Yet the banks are lending less money than they did five months ago. Bank executives are still taking home princely sums, their toxic assets and non-performing loans are growing, and the banks are still cooking their books. And now the Treasury is talking about converting taxpayer dollars into bank equity, which exposes taxpayers to even greater losses.

So that's the report card. An A on the budget, B on the stimulus, and F on the bailout. On the whole (given how I weigh grades) that gives Obamanomics a C-plus. Not bad given the magnitude of the problems Obama inherited. But by the same token, not nearly good enough.

posted by Robert Reich

http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/04/report-card-on-obomanomics-approaching.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Reich is right--and I'm a big fan of Obama too. Enough bank bailouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. The bank bailouts were a September '08 Bush (/Paulson) idea
TRAP!/TARP

Short memories?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Extremely short
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Amoeba short
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Except Geithner is implementing Paulson's original plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What additional $s have been spent?
And the banks have recovered nicely.

Only one of the "big banks" is in "trouble."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. None--yet! Paulson's plan was to purchase the 'toxic assets' which Geither plans to implement.
Edited on Tue Apr-21-09 02:51 PM by flpoljunkie
I would question that there is only one 'big bank' in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Oh, come on...
One is in trouble.

One is in danger.

That is it, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Now that's more than one, isn't it? The latest from Reuters on the 'stress tests.'
SCENARIOS-After stress tests, what next for U.S. banks?

April 20 (Reuters) - U.S. regulators and the nation's largest banks have nearly completed 'stress tests' to determine how well the lenders would fare if the recession proves to be deeper and longer than expected.

Citigroup Inc, Wells Fargo & Co, Bank of America MetLife Inc and GMAC are among the 19 lenders under scrutiny who may get government help to strengthen their balance sheets following the May 4 announcement of the results.

On Friday, officials will release a document explaining the underlying stress testing assumptions and how to interpret the results. Regulators are expected to take care that test results do not put weaker banks into a tailspin, but may set some tough requirements on how the banks should rebuild.

Below are the government's options to help restore the banks to health:

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2009/04/20/afx6312744.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. No bank will fail the test
Citi is the only bank that is immediate danger according to my sources.

BoA will recover and Wells Fargo will report results tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. You may well be right, but some are likely to need more taxpayer money, in any case.
Edited on Tue Apr-21-09 03:28 PM by flpoljunkie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. nm misread your post
Edited on Tue Apr-21-09 02:56 PM by Egnever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Take responsibility much?
Edited on Tue Apr-21-09 02:53 PM by depakid
Gaithner and Summers et al. signed onto and own these policies now- they've furthered them and the administration will be held accountable by the public for the for the results.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I am quite pleased with the results
Short term problems have been resolved, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'd say that Reich should be giving an Incomplete on the Bank Bail out
and its results. He simply doesn't really know how it will all turn out,
and that is what he should admit to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. You got it right there.
Then again, he probably shouldn't be giving a report card on these issues at all right now. It's way too early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. um, he's the economist
with a pretty good track record. and economists make predictions based on information all the time. you might say that's a big part of their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. And?
He giving a grade before seeing the outcome of a situation that almost did us in.

An incomplete is reasonable. F stands for failure, and that has not been confirmed
as of yet....to the chagrin of many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Geithner agreed that 'all options were on the table' in response to Elizabeth Warren's question.
Edited on Tue Apr-21-09 03:28 PM by flpoljunkie
This, at the TARP Congressional Oversight Hearing this morning, chaired by Harvard professor Elizabeth Warren. She seemed pleased with his response. Warren had asked him about the three things that could be done with the banks which are insolvent: liquidation, receivership or reorganization, or subsidization.

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/watch.aspx?MediaId=HP-R-17653
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. Need more stimulus
But the idiots in congress and the media will not let that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes, that's is a very serious concern for our economic recovery--not enough stimulus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. An F on the bank bailouts???
Yet the banks are lending less money than they did five months ago


Five months ago we were beginning the biggest bank run in the history of mankind. Think panic of "Its a Wonderful Life" times 100.

Washington Mutual, the largest retail banking operation in the country, suffered a withdrawal of $ 50 billion. That is what the comparison should be with, not the amount of lending.

Back from the cliff the system is showing some signs of thaw. In retrospect nobody would have done things the same way but to give it an "F" just shows how selective the memory can be.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Washington Mutual no longer exists
Sucked up by Chase Manhatten (JPMorgan Chase & Company.)


And things are much better in lending than the media will report.


Look at the ReFis. SBA lending is looking nice in Q2 and Q3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC