Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pre-emptive war vs torture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:17 PM
Original message
Pre-emptive war vs torture
I am and have been nauseated by the torture.

Still the torture seems like less the crime than the needless pre-emptive war on Iraq complete with a "Shock & Awe" marketing campaign in the MSM. There were 100,000s of innocents killed many woman and children and a society destroyed.

We know we were lied into war. For some reason bombs blowing innocents to pieces, however impersonal compared to torture, was far far greater in extent.

What am I missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're not missing anything..both are considered
war crimes. Both are against the constitution we hold dear. Both should be prosecuted as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. My 2nd OP ever and ignored ;o(
I agree with you.

Trying to figure what what will occur is Mr Toad's wild ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. War crimes are war crimes. Intolerable is intolerable.
Edited on Sat Apr-18-09 02:04 PM by pat_k
. . .both "pre-emptive war" and subjecting people in the custody of the state to "cruel, degrading, or inhumane" treatment are war crimes. Both are intolerable. Something is intolerable or not. There is no such thing as "more intolerable" or "less intolerable." (IMO, your mileage may vary)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thedeanpeople Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Edited on Sat Apr-18-09 04:39 PM by thedeanpeople
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama's Crime Is Worse Than Both (yes, really)
Because while criminals like bushcheney may come and go, a corrupt police force institutionalizes approval for all their crimes.

The rest of the impeachophobic beltway "leadership" is just as guilty of this far worse offense.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. So are we about to start demanding the heads of soldiers, sailors, and pilots
that participated in our illegal wars or will leadership work in that case?

Going after CIA operatives is just like going after a soldier just back from the sand, in my opinion. Get the ringleaders and justice is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ringleaders yes, officers and lifers justifiably but probably not.
Grunts are scapegoats.

This is from the perspective of a planned non-religious CO in Vietnam that got #318 in the first draft lottery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. No, CIA operatives are not like soldiers.
They are not "lawful combatants." They are civilians. And they can resign.

Soldiers are immune from prosecution for participating in "illegal wars." And soldiers are trained not to commit war crimes, for which they have no immunity.

There is no legal or moral analogy.

===
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. A CIA Operative today
is a future Presidential advisor tomorrow. They knew what they are doing. Following orders is not a defece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC