Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Isn't There A Law About States Having A Right To Full Representation In The Senate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:53 PM
Original message
Why Isn't There A Law About States Having A Right To Full Representation In The Senate?
No law about dragging out an election, where there is a clear leader, even if that lead is rather small?
Is there something in Constitutional law?
Jesus Christ on a stick, this bothers me. I don't want to hear about, "Al's almost there, be patient," etc. With so much going on now, we need Al in the Senate. Is anybody going to stop this madness? I'm just fucking asking!
:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. I thought Minnesota was a good government state.
Too many republican judges were allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. We haven't had full representation in the Senate since Wellstone died
Coleman was there to represent Bushco, not us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Every Time I See Wellstone's Name Mentioned, I Feel Sad
I miss Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why ddn't Potemkin Village have a Mayor?
Edited on Sat Mar-07-09 12:13 AM by autorank
Franken should have been seated right after the recount results were certified. That IS the custom of the Senate. The fact that he wasn't had nothing to do with legality or precedent. It had nothing to do with representation for the people of Minnesota. It was all about politics and not following the rules, as they're written. It's an embarrassment and an affront to representational government.

The delay in seating him was totally unnecessary and a violation of precedent.

From: Franken, Burris and the US Senate: Try Following the Rules

Should a contest be brought against a senator-elect prior to his being sworn in, the chamber's custom has been to seat the individual contingent upon his credentials being in order. (10) Thus, the precedent has been that a senator-elect has a prima facie right to the seat, while the contest brought against him is being investigated. Moreover, the individual is considered seated without prejudice to himself or to the office. This pseudo-legal arrangement allows the Senate to remove the individual by a simple majority vote, should a subsequent investigation find him not to be entitled to the seat. Otherwise, the Senate's only course of action would be expulsion, which would require a two-thirds majority (12). Partisanship and Contested Election Cases in the Senate, 1789-2002, Jeffery A. Jenkins, Northwestern University. Studies in American Political Development, 19 (Spring 2005), 53-74, Cambridge University Press. (Author's emphasis)


This is outlined in a report by the Senate outlining the election contests to date.

If Coleman pursues a post certification election contest, the Minnesota canvassing board certification becomes "provisional" by state law indicating that a contest is under way. It may take three months to resolve the election contest. The citizens of Minnesota will be denied representation should the Senate refuse to seat the declared winner after certification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. If this was Wyoming can you stop the screaming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. There is;
Edited on Sat Mar-07-09 01:18 AM by elleng
its the Constitution.

Have any residents of the State taken legal action to force such action, or is everyone being 'polite?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. citation?
There certainly isn't anything in the constitution that says the senate can't do business unless and until two senators have been seated for every state. If a senator dies or resigns, the senate doesn't shut down until he/she is replaced. What would the lawsuit demand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The Consitution does not mandate that a state have representation in Congress ............
Section three of the Constitution only stipulates the requirements of an individual to run for Senate, how long their terms are, and how temporary vacancies were filled.

The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, (chosen by the Legislature thereof,) (The preceding words in parentheses superseded by 17th Amendment, section 1.) for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.

Immediately after they shall be assembled in Consequence of the first Election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three Classes. The Seats of the Senators of the first Class shall be vacated at the Expiration of the second Year, of the second Class at the Expiration of the fourth Year, and of the third Class at the Expiration of the sixth Year, so that one third may be chosen every second Year; (and if Vacancies happen by Resignation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary Appointments until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such Vacancies.) (The preceding words in parentheses were superseded by the 17th Amendment, section 2.)

No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.

The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.

The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States.

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.


The actual election or choosing of a Senator is left to each state.

This has always been my problem with Presidential elections. There is no across the board standard on how we choose our President. Each state is allowed to formulate and implement the method as to how their electoral votes are voted upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State
SHALL is a mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. And the Supreme Court ruled on this when? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well there could be a law
Edited on Sat Mar-07-09 01:53 PM by AllentownJake
and that law could state that in case of a contested election the govenor picks a temp appointment till the election is resolved and we could have Norm Coleman in the senate till this is resolved instead of waiting it out with Al and Norm could draw it out till his term is over :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. Of course, we would not be having this discussion
if the Colemna had a slight lead. It is up to the State of Minnesota to resolve the issue. That is in accordance with the U.S. Constitution. If you do not like that system, 1), change the Minnisota Constitution,2) Amend the U.S. Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. Article I, Sec 4.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. This One?
Section 4. The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations, except as to the places of choosing Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That's the only Article I, Sec 4 that I'm aware of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC