Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bloomberg: Obama Seeks ‘Automatic Pensions,’ Labor Enforcement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 08:56 PM
Original message
Bloomberg: Obama Seeks ‘Automatic Pensions,’ Labor Enforcement


Feb. 26 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama called for establishing automatic workplace pensions and expanding unemployment insurance as part of his spending plan for the U.S. Labor Department next fiscal year.

Obama is proposing a 4.7 percent increase in the Labor Department’s budget to $13.3 billion for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1. That’s an increase from an estimated $12.7 billion in the current fiscal year and $11.8 billion in 2008, according to a budget outline submitted to Congress today.

The budget “lays the groundwork for future establishment of a system of automatic workplace pensions, to operate alongside Social Security, that is expected to dramatically increase” retirement and personal savings, Obama’s Office of Management and Budget said in its outline, without giving details on the costs.

The plan would force employers that don’t offer retirement plans to enroll employees in a “direct-deposit IRA account,” with the option for workers themselves to opt out. Currently, 75 million working Americans, or about half the workforce, lacks employer-based retirement plans, according to the administration.

The proposal “raises more questions than it answers,” said Representative Howard “Buck” McKeon of California, the top Republican on the House Education and Labor Committee.

“We need to take a step back and question this ever- expanding role for the federal government,” he said in a statement.

snip
Republicans in Congress may oppose efforts to broaden the unemployment insurance program, said James Sherk, a labor analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a Washington-based research group promoting free enterprise and small government.

“The entire premise is faulty,” he said. “Unemployment insurance is not supposed to be a safety net. Its not heating assistance or food stamps, it’s not supposed to be an expanded version of welfare.”

much more.....
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&sid=a1.x9_d3sPc0&refer=home



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. One more thing for the GOP to label as class warfare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, guess it comes with the territory if one is going to be a progressive President....
Which it appears is what President Obama will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. And we need to support him and help fight the right wing
bull shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Unemployment insurance is not supposed to be a safety net."
Really?

All this time I thought it was.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Unemployment insurance is not supposed to be a safety net? wtf?
Since when is any "insurance" NOT a safety net? Bizarre!

Tells me I don't need to read the article. I live in the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. I LOVE the direct-deposit IRA account requirement. Most people would use it if it was there and
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 09:07 PM by Pirate Smile
they had to opt out but they wont bother to go initiate it themselves because it seems like too much of a pain in the ass for the small amount they can afford to save.

This is a program the behavioral scientists/economists (I'm not sure now exactly what their title is) say will increase savings over the long term.

It is a great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. According to the article,
it would increase participation from 15% currently to as much as 80%!

The pension plan would increase the savings participation rate for low and middle income workers to about 80 percent from 15 percent now, according to the budget blueprint.

also....

The president also proposed making extended unemployment benefits more of an “automatic stabilizer” when certain economic conditions arise. The change aims to make the unemployment insurance program a “more effective social safety net,” the administration said. The proposal didn’t provide details on how that would be done or the extent of the changes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Plus....There is a tax-incentive for IRA (non-Roth) contributions
Reduces AGI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. The article continues.......
The Labor Department will also increase enforcement of workplace regulations, according to the budget plan. “For the past eight years, the department’s law enforcement agencies have struggled with growing workloads and shrinking staffs,” the administration said.

Funding would be increased for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, for the wage and hour division of the Labor Department, and for the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nope. This is not a solution. The solution is to bring back DEFINED BENEFIT pension plans.
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 11:39 PM by antigop
Any actuary will tell you the most efficient way to provide retirement benefits for a large population is through a DEFINED BENEFIT pension plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC