Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Rahm inept or just bad at his job?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:15 PM
Original message
Is Rahm inept or just bad at his job?
I mean really, how many bad picks does he make before the only conclusion is that he is not up to the job? Shouldn't the vetting happen before the nomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. it wasn't a vetting issue, it was a spineless lying Repuke being a turncoat
after he agreed he could support the President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. that would be a vetting issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Yes it is really too bad that Rahm can't see the future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
57. I would suggest that he should be able to see the future.
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 07:54 PM by redstate_democrat
or at least foresee this kind of wack shit happening. That is what distinguishes an "adviser" from some regular asshole on the street giving his opinion. An adviser's opinion ( especially one for the POTUS), should give INFORMED advisement, meaning, they should be able to foresee things like this happening and advise the POTUS on the possibility of it happening so that the POTUS can make an informed decision based on the facts and reasonably likely outcomes.

This tool Gregg should have been totally ruled out by an "adviser".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. Yeah, it seems like it wouldn't
take a crystal ball to see gregg was a bad idea but it happened and now we look for the silver lining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
39. No, it would be a lying issue.
It would also be a GOP playing games issue.

This one is not on Rham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. WTF? What does this have to do with Rahm?
After Gregg chased the President around and asked to be in the administration he backed out. He made himself look bad. What are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. thank you
as that was my initial reaction.


:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. As chief of staff
everyone of these failed picks are his fault. Part of the vetting includes determining if the candidate is really going to take the job, as in the Judd case, so as to avoid the embarrassment of making an offer that then gets declined. Gregg didn't exactly have to 'chase the president'. He made himself available and they took him - and took him without correctly determining the risk involved. If this was one pick gone bad, you might have a point. Unfortunately it is one of many.

So inept or just bad at his job?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Richardson and Daschle had different issues and reasons for
dropping out. Gregg himself said he could follow policy and wanted to be part of the administration. The buck stops with whether or not President Obama wanted to give him the position. He chose to give it to him. I don't know why you make Obama out to be some wimp taking direction from Rahm on everything. Gregg showed himself to be an ass and makes himself and only himself look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. two cases in point
neither of them should have gotten to the publicly announced stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
60. Did anyone really expect that reactionary to carry out the wishes of Obama
with passion and hard work?

Hell, you may as well pick Ann Coulter for Secretary of HHS.

That makes just as much sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. Not a damned thing. Some people just say shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. LOL!!
That made me crack up! You sound like me!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
69. Well, you see, according to some folks here, Rahm Emanuel
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 10:26 AM by Arkana
is responsible for all of the following:

--The fall of Troy
--Defeat of the Spartans at the Pass of Thermopylae
--The fall of the Roman Empire
--The Dark Ages (and the plague!)
--The Stamp Acts, Tea Acts and Intolerable Acts
--The Boston Massacre
--The Whiskey Rebellion
--The War of 1812
--Andrew Jackson and the Trail of Tears
--The Panic of 1837
--The Mexican War
--Slavery in all its forms, anywhere in the world it existed in the last 500 years
--South Carolina's secession from the Union in 1860 and the consequential firing on Fort Sumter
--All the deaths at Gettysburg, Antietam, and Shiloh
--The assassination of President Lincoln (apparently Booth was innocent!) and the attempt on Secretary of State William Seward's life
--The theft of the election of 1876 by the Republican Party (good news, President Hayes! It wasn't the corrupt fucks in your party after all! It was that evil bastard Rahm Emanuel!)
--The assassination of James Garfield (nope, it wasn't Charles Guiteau!)
--The economic panics of the 1880s and 1890s, as well as the Bonus Army
--The assassination of William McKinley (Czolgosz was innocent!)
--World War I (yes, Rahm shot Duke Ferdinand and his wife!)
--The Great Depression (Yup! All of it!)
--Hitler (and yet Rahm is Jewish! How'd he do it????)
--The attack on Pearl Harbor
--The dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
--The Korean "Conflict"
--The Cuban Missile crisis
--The assassination of John F. Kennedy (Yup! Oswald, Giancana, aliens...none of that! Rahm was the lone gunman, folks!)
--All facets of our involvement in Vietnam
--Richard Nixon
--The long lines for gas during the Ford/Carter years
--Ronnie Raygun, Iran-Contra, and Star Wars
--Monica (yes! He told her to go suck Bill Clinton's dick!)
--The theft of the election in 2000
--Most severe medical conditions, weather patterns, and the reason I CAN'T FIND MY GODDAMN READING GLASSES.

Phew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rahm isn't the president. I don't know why people forget that.
I'm sure if someone was suggested by Emanuel that Prez Obama didn't like, that would be the end of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Oh snap, you're right, he's Chief of Staff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. You should go work for MSNBC. They are all spouting the same meme.
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 05:18 PM by Parker CA
How is this Rahm's or Obama's fault?? Gregg withdrew HIS OWN nomination. Rahm and Obama had nothing to do with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. One of many failed picks.
I blame Rahm. You can blame the weather if you choose. Rahm looks like a more likely root cause to me. Sometimes MSNBC is right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
41. He caved to the REPUGS
and used the same talking points to back out (the census? oh puleeze)...

Gregg will get clobbered when he's up for re-election. I will make sure of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
56. thank you for doing your part to making sure if he runs he loses! and,
I think picking non-Dems is a bad choice anyhow. They don't really believe what Obama believes or they'd be a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
certainot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
66. it's a GOP talking point limbaugh and hannity have been barfing
all over the country and after a while the lazy celebrity talking heads jump on the talk radio bandwagon because the sheer volume and repetition make it acceptable,

that GOP-coordinated UNCONTESTED repetition enables astounding and democracy destroying hypocrisy - bush's VP and defence secretary (among other crimes) did business with saddam but so what? the real difference maker (aside from one party being a political party and one being a criminal party) is who owns the media and who has a talk radio monopoly that can repeat whatever it wants from 1000 stations 24/7/365 to decide what molehills become mountains.

dems do have a higher standard- not hard- but if you hear it on GOP talk radio it is bullshit and to repeat it is to reinforce their bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dude, Rahm is the one who wisely took the Census away from Gregg.
Rahm obviously didn't trust Gregg as far as he could throw him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Rahm obviously didn't trust Gregg
so Obama's chief of staff ok'd a pick he obviously didn't trust?

Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Rahm is not at the top of the food chain.
Gregg wasn't his decision to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. one step down
and yes it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM
Original message
Okay, then who should Rahm nominate for Commerce Secretary now?
And who should he name for HHS?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. 1. Commerce: a Democrat
2. HHS: a progressive Democrat.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:36 PM
Original message
I noticed you didn't give the NAME of who RAHM should nominate.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. yeah - I'm not Chief of Staff
but if I were I would not have blundered this badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. no, and you obviously don't know TWO important things:
1. The NAME of a "progressive" suited for the position
2. The CoS doesn't nominate cabinet posts. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
70. So Rahm is more responsible
than President Obama in your delusional world? Got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bogeyman Rahm is responsible for everything
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 05:19 PM by Uzybone
Look! Under your bed. Its Rahm Emanuel!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yep! He keyed my car, told the dog crap on the rug, and squeezed the toothpaste from the top.
Bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. That makes me like him even more......
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Er, um what are the responsibilities of Chief of Staff?
you tell me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. To select, vet and nominate every single one of Obamas appointments
according to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Under my bed? Promise???
Cuz I'd let him sleep (?) IN the bed, ya know!


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. okay.....I wouldn't want to be rude either....
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. So it's agreed...maybe the two of us could take Amy on
I bet she'd be able to knock the shit out of me alone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. LOL!! I'm skeeered of Amy!
We better just stay here! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. That's probably for the best.
She's small but I bet she's fierce!

Back OT: what is the story with all you people? What kind of powers are you assigning to Rahm anyway? First, he's responsible for Howard Dean not getting HHS, now it's his fault Tim Geithner, Tom Daschle and now Judd Gregg all have skeletons. I suppose we should blame Rahm for Richardson's bowing out as well.

I think he'd be pretty surprised about his omnipotence! He's Chief of Staff, not Obama's Golem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. I'm finding that anything that may be slighly negative is all
Rahm's doing. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. It might be they were testing out that bipartisan stuff gently.
I think they are getting a good idea of how it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Ok - but that makes me even more nuts
how could they possibly think that these asshats were going to do anything except fuck with them? How? Seriously, what does that say about those within the administration who pushed this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. They pushed the "we're all americans" thing really hard. They were obliged
to try it on, otherwise they'd have started hearing about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
71. If you think it's Rahm that's pushing
bipartisanship rather than President Obama, your head is in the sand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #71
73. Rahm is the least bipartisan of the bunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. You know that, I know that
but some people insist on blaming him for every President Obama mishap. Tiresome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. WTF ?! When did you stop beating your wife/husband/pets/kids?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. Neither. Rahm doesn't have a crystal ball to tell him when someone
is a huge baby and terrified of his own party. And judging by the way Gregg is shaking like a leaf and stammering his way though this press conference, he's a weak little scaredy-cat (or as I call it, a big pussy).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Numba6 Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
30. You've gotta be kidding... how can any thinking person make these judgements 1 month into Obama's te
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 05:34 PM by Numba6
term?

I guess you're ready to impeach Obama over all this, now?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
31. Are you a comedian or really uninformed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. How are you blaming Rahm? I don't get it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
38. for people questioning -- Gregg was Emanuel and Reid's idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #38
50. You're still quoting Politico. Tsk, tsk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
40. I wouldn't blame him for everything but he has been sloppy no doubt. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
42. he's right of center
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. no he isn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. well..
wonder where his true sympathies lie?

"President-elect Barack Obama’s choice to be his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, is already widely known in the halls of Washington for serving as an adviser to President Clinton, and most recently as a congressman from Illinois. But in between those two roles, Mr. Emanuel made millions of dollars on Wall Street as an investment banker with Wasserstein Perella, as the boutique firm was known at the time.

Despite having little experience or education in finance, Mr. Emanuel became a managing director at the firm’s Chicago office in 1999, helping to bring in business and seal deals.

According to a 2003 article in The Chicago Tribune, Mr. Emanuel was brought in by one of the firm’s founders, Bruce Wasserstein, who was one of President Clinton’s most active fund-raisers on Wall Street and is now the head of Lazard.

“Rahm did a great job for our firm,” Mr. Wasserstein told DealBook. “When Rahm worked with us at Wasserstein Perella, he showed a great ability to reconcile divergent interests for a constructive outcome.”

In his two-and-a-half-year stint as a banker, Mr. Emanuel — who once trained as a ballet dancer and was briefly a civilian volunteer on an Israeli military base — made $16.2 million, according to Congressional disclosures.

Mr. Emanuel worked on eight deals while at Wasserstein Perella, the two biggest of which involved politically connected utilities, The Tribune reported.

In one deal, he advised Commonwealth Edison, the power producer, in its $8.2 billion acquisition of Pennsylvania-based Peco Energy. In the other, he helped GTCR Golder Rauner, a Chicago-based venture capital and private equity firm, in its purchase of the SecurityLink home security unit from SBC Communications, now AT&T.

Even though he returned to politics in 2002, Mr. Emanuel continues to have fans on Wall Street, judging from his campaign contributions.

The Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks campaign finance trends, notes that in the 2008 election cycle, he was the House’s No. 1 recipient of contributions from hedge funds, private equity firms and the broader securities and investment industry — a group that it points out is “not the most popular of industries in the current economy.”

<http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/rahm-emanuel-former-investment-banker/?scp=4&sq=rahm%20emanual%20and%20right%20of%20center&st=cse>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. well
"President-elect Barack Obama’s choice to be his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, is already widely known in the halls of Washington for serving as an adviser to President Clinton, and most recently as a congressman from Illinois. But in between those two roles, Mr. Emanuel made millions of dollars on Wall Street as an investment banker with Wasserstein Perella, as the boutique firm was known at the time.

Umm... so? Making money makes you right of center? Tell that to the Roosevelts and the Kennedys...

I realize far left progressives have a problem with people making money. Fortunately for the Democratic party, "progressives: don't speak for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. spoken like a true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #59
64. Democrat
Care to refute anything?

Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. They lie with President Obama since Barack and Rahm have been good friends since Obama's days
in the Illinois State Senate.

Rahm is 100% for President Obama.


Also, from that link you provided:

“When Rahm worked with us at Wasserstein Perella, he showed a great ability to reconcile divergent interests for a constructive outcome.”


So, Rahm Emanuel has the ability to take two divergent viewpoints and bring them together for a good outcome. Think that's why President Obama made him Chief of Staff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
45. maybe Rahm KNEW he has an Abramoff problem and would have to
leave... "President Obama has tried over and over to include Republicans in the recovery of the economy, but they are unwilling or incapable of being part of our future . . ."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
48. Gregg is DONE. Hear hear Rahm!!

Job well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
49. so apparently for some here at DU, Rahm is the new Rove
The puppetmaster who pulls all the strings and is responsible for every decision made by the puppet president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #49
72. Excellent comparison
And not very complimentary to the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
53. I dunno but I bet that Howard Dean pays his taxes
Just saying. And he's even *gasp* a Democrat. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
55. Thank for your concern
now grow up.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalsince1968 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
58. I put the blame squarely on Obama for this lousy choice. He believes in bipartisanship. I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
62. A cos can approve a nomination to go forward but at the end of the day it was Obama's decision
And perhaps he made the wrong one. This blame Rahm for everything because we don't like that he was DLC and a foh (friend of Hillary), etc. is crap. If the sun is not out today and its windy in CT I will blame Rahm, I will blame Rahm for my shitty tires, my credit card bills, my 4 year old talking back to me, my husband's work van breaking down. Really, this is bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
63. Neither. This isn't Rahm's territory. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
65. So much yapping
sort of like a puppy mill in here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
67. I've been negligent in keeping up with the latest DU news,
did Rahm wrestle the strings away from Hillary to become Obama's new puppet master?:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
68. Obama. Picked. Him. FIRST. So....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
75. Then, I guess Joe Biden should accept some of the blame.
He is the last person that Obama consults with before the decision is made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
76. If Rahm is "inept or just bad at his job?"
God help us all! What would that say about Obama picking him?

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC