Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The supposedly forged document - great read and BRILLIANT advice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 11:03 AM
Original message
The supposedly forged document - great read and BRILLIANT advice
http://seetheforest.blogspot.com/2004_09_01_seetheforest_

Dave Johnson: 'The supposedly forged document'
Date: Tuesday, September 14 @ 09:36:43 EDT
Topic: Republicans

By Dave Johnson, Seeing The Forest

Remember the Sandy Berger smear? This was the story claiming that President Clinton's National Security Advisor had smuggled incriminating documents out of the National Archives. (Berger was
completely cleared.) This was a planned smear - in the works for months - and was used by the Republicans to make the public think that Clinton was responsible for letting the 9/11 attack happen and that "the Democrats" were engaged in a conspiracy to cover up the evidence.

Well, along similar lines, and listening to Limbaugh just now, I can see that the Right's "Bush Guard memo forgery" is taking shape. The entire Wurlitzer - the Right's media echo chamber that is able to repeat a lie over and over and over until it is the ONLY story in the news - is cranked up and telling the public that CBS has been caught engaging in a smear against Bush using forged documents. Never mind that the document (one document, no plural 's') in question is legit.

According to Limbaugh:
One document is said to look like it could have been typed on a modern computer.

Therefore ALL such documents are forgeries.

Therefore CBS is intentionally working a smear on Bush.

Therefore ANY stories about Bush's National Guard service are not to be believed - he served honorably.

Therefore this proves that CBS (and by extension, ALL mainstream media) is a tool of the "Liberal Elite" and is working hand-in-hand with the Kerry campaign to smear Bush.

Again, by extension, ANY stories ANYWHERE, EVER about Bush doing ANYTHING bad are Liberal lies. Keep in mind that this is not just Limbaugh. In a NY Times Op-Ed this morning William Safire has a piece titled "Those Discredited Memos" (note that he uses the plural...) And it doesn't stop there. It hardly even STARTS there. Today a Google News search for "Bush documents CBS" locates 2,460 stories. (According to reporting from Salon, a Republican PR firm that is also involved with the Swift Boat smear is engaged in driving this story.)
<more>
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mimitabby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. right on..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. sigh - our lying media that repeats GOP PR lies and calls itself ethical!
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is a joke
To claim that the argument for why these documents are fakes is a simplistic as being "said to look like it could have been typed on a modern computer" is ridiculous. The are many complex and compelling reasons to believe that the documents are fakes, reasons that go beyond proportional fonts and the superscripted 'th'. Until someone at CBS can pull out a typewriter that can reproduce the CYA memo, IMHO that document is suspect. Until I see them do that that, I'm a skeptic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why aren't the Dems able to counter all this?
Is it because most Dems asctually have to work for a living, and not just off thier dividends? We do have a good think tank, Center for American Progress, but they haven't een able to capture much face time in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpcmxr Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bad Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC