Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's shocking appointment today IS that Change We Need

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:09 PM
Original message
Obama's shocking appointment today IS that Change We Need
Edited on Wed Jan-07-09 02:18 PM by ProSense

Obama's shocking appointment today IS that Change We Need

by Hope Reborn

I'm floored by the move today that President Elect Obama made in creating an office Chief Performance Officer... I haven't seen much if anything mentioned anywhere about this, but consider for a moment what this means. Hopefully, gone are the day's of "bloated, wasteful" government because there is now an agent of direct oversight with Presidential level access & authority to ensure that programs are meeting metrics set by the President and that cabinet secretaries and key personnel are meeting goals laid out.

This is some real tectonic plate shifting stuff when you consider the loyalty first, politics second, results third world the White House has lived in since Bush Clinton Bush Reagan Carter For Ever!

Enough with my poorly worded explanation, here is the meat of the challenge that Obama laid down today to actually see that Change we all seek, we all worked for, we all supported...

Change starts and ends with accountability and performance.

You can watch video of the appointment here.

From the announcement

We committed to change the way our government in Washington does business so that we're no longer squandering billions of tax dollars on programs that have outlived their usefulness or exist solely because of the power of a lobbyist or interest group. We can no longer afford to sustain the old ways when we know there are new and more efficient ways of getting the job done.

Even in good times, Washington can't afford to continue these bad practices. In bad times, it's absolutely imperative that Washington stop them and restore confidence that our government is on the side of taxpayers and everyday Americans.

Just today, the Congressional Budget Office announced that the deficit we are inheriting for this budget year will be $1.2 trillion. And we know that our Recovery and Reinvestment plan will necessarily add more. My own economic and budget team projects that, unless we take decisive action, even after our economy pulls out of its slide, trillion dollar deficits will be a reality for years to come.

The Republicans are sweating because we have a Democratic President actually interested in doing something about the Deficit that Bush created...

<…>

A groundbreaking new idea that will hopefully revolutionize the way Government actually delivers on its heady promise of action, reform, change.

During the campaign, I said that we must scour this budget, line-by-line, eliminating what we don't need, or what doesn't work, and improving the things that do.

As the first Chief Performance Officer, working with Peter Orszag and Rob Nabors at the Office of Management and Budget, Nancy Killefer is uniquely qualified to lead that effort.

A Chief Performance Officer... Imagine what that would have done with the Cheney government that let Halliburton write it's own contracts... or the Bush environmental task force or anything Bush did actually... This is some real change

For nearly thirty years – as a leader at McKinsey & Company, and as Assistant Secretary for Management, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer at Treasury under President Clinton -- Nancy has built a career out of making major American corporations and public institutions more efficient, effective and transparent.

Three words that I never relate to Government

But Nancy also understands that at the end of the day, government services are delivered by people. That's why she's always worked tirelessly to empower employees to take matters into their own hands: to rethink outmoded ways of doing things, to embrace new systems and technologies, and to take initiative in developing better practices.

When Nancy was offered her first position at Treasury, she responded, “If you're willing to embrace significant change, then you're looking at the right person. But if you just want to keep the trains running on time, don't ask me to do this job.”


more






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hope Reborn?
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama does not play that is for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds promising..something to
encourage. Obama said he would go through the spending line by line and see what we needed and what we didn't. A smarter government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is the 'community organizer' who saw well intentioned money go to
waste in the bureacracy.


There is a very 'frugal' side to Obama that compels him to squeeze every nickel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm surprised and thrilled. Increased efficiency is like a tax hike that nobody has to pay for,
Edited on Wed Jan-07-09 02:30 PM by Occam Bandage
or a spending cut that nobody loses money from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'll K&R to give more time for someone to come up with why this
sucks too.

IT will be any moment now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Heh! Beat me to it! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. here you go;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is part of the change I was hoping for.
He's going to be great. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It really is a good thing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is how you run a business or any organization that you want
to meet it's goals and expectations. He said during the campaign that he would check on spending programs "line by line" and get rid of those that aren't working and fund those that do.

I think this is a great appointment and another step in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Well, it's not exactly the accountant friend of the presidential look-alike

that stepped in after the president had a heart attack, but sounds like it is pretty much along those lines.



I like this change. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. ha!!
I like it too!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'll give this a definite
Edited on Wed Jan-07-09 09:43 PM by merh
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes We Can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Ya know, assuming this position has some real authority(which it needs for it's duties)
Then a lot of the other positions that has been filled by people we are not so fond of(due to being conservatives or some position they hold) are not going to be able to deviate to much from Obama's stated goals and guidelines to accomplish their own

So i agree, Yes We Can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Sort of like a quality assurance for the government.
Like you said, the job has to have some real authority,

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dccrossman Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hopefully she'll have real authority
Past problems haven't always been with the identification of poorly performing policies and people, but with the political costs of trying to eliminate them. Some Congressperson (D) or (R) will jump at seeing something that helps their district being effected, no matter how inefficient that something may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. I love it! Halliburton is but one example of government waste and sloppiness under Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC