Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gupta - The Objective Of Hiring An Accomplished Shill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:02 PM
Original message
Gupta - The Objective Of Hiring An Accomplished Shill

I can't quite understand the "he's a shill" criticism of Gupta.

Isn't that a good part of what the Surgeon General does?

If you want to hire a shill, you hire a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps hiring one of our "shills" might have been a better choice?
Edited on Wed Jan-07-09 12:03 PM by YOY
n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He is someone that knows how to slap liberals around
Edited on Wed Jan-07-09 12:09 PM by boloboffin
So Obama must consider that a plus.

I'm really starting to get tired of Obama's putting us into our "proper place."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I guess one can see it two ways

Having Gupta shill for Obama may be more an exercise in putting Gupta in an appropriate place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Maybe Obama won't battle wits...
With the unarmed? He said all along he was going to be a lot more bi-partisan than we are used to... and I think he will avoid a lot of BS by doing so. It doesn't mean he won't be pushing the progressive agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. After 8+ years of being pretty much dead freaking on...
I really don't need to be put in my place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. It's easy to be 'dead freaking on' when the alternative is abject idiocy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. One of the frequently made points about Nixon is...

His McCarthism credentials made him the perfect person to normalize relations with China and institute detente' and disarmament talks with the USSR.

Just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. what tdo you mean "one of OUR" shills? The man showed Obama's take on AIDs Policy
Edited on Wed Jan-07-09 02:08 PM by cryingshame
was far superior prior to the past election.

His work on tv shows pretty clearly he's concerned with "liberal" public health issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Like privatized health care?
Oh yeah...concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't get the shill deal at all
You don't become a neurosurgeon being an idiot... nor would you work for Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. 'Shill' does not mean 'stupid'.
It means selling your soul to corporate interests.

With him, there is no chance he will back REAL universal health care - at best we will get the kind of universal health INSURANCE that Hillary wants. And as long as private insurance is in the mix there will be NO reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Is there some evidence of this leaning?
I've heard a lot of talk on DU about it, but never saw anything to point this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. The evidence is that he has publicly expounded on the benefits of
the capitalist health care industry on his show, and nothing he says contradicts anything that Obama has ever said about HIS health care plan.

Obama has NEVER been for single-payer government funded universal healthcare. Choosing Gupta reflects that stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. There are real benefits to the capitalists health system
as well as many drawbacks. Just because someone states there are benefits, doesn't make them a shill.

Any intelligent discussion on the matter will analyze both the costs and benefits of the capitalists system and a single payer one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. He discussed single-payer alright - when he reviewed 'Sicko'
and was wrong on every single criticism he made of it.

Michael Moore was right, and Gupta's corporate masters were wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. You'll have to elaborate if you expect me to believe there is any
benefit to for-profit health insurance. I worked for one of those companies. The only real concern they have about health care is how to avoid paying for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. He'll be making policy on his own?

There is every chance he will back what the Obama administration tells him to back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Of course he isn't an idiot. He is a brilliant neurosurgeon who decided to sell his soul
to Big Pharm and corporations in exchange for fame and enough money to drive the Jag he likes to brag about; to sell the book he wrote; to sell the TV Series he wrote based on his life ("Mash on speed"), etc. Just a brief look through the transcripts of his show reads like an ad for Merck, Pozen, Smith-Kline, etc. Some of the things he has advocated have been outright dangerous.

I've posted all this here in other threads. This doesn't mean he will be an ineffective SPOKESPERSON.. for that, he is supremely qualified, as he will say almost anything he is paid to say.

Google is your friend.

http://moderate.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/doctoring-the-news-cnns-sanjay-gupta-laura-bush-and-merck/

http://mediabloodhound.typepad.com/weblog/2007/07/we-all-witnesse.html

http://scienceblogs.com/intersection/2009/01/sanjay_gupta_for_surgeon_gener.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. the first link doesn't work....

The second link suggests he is a publicity seeker and bad journalist.

The third link is another re-hash of the Moore thing.

What has he "advocated" for or against as a matter of personal principle?

If he was given a set of talking points for the Moore interview, and went through them in the discussion, so what?

The point is entirely that he is an effective spokesperson when given a position to advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think anyone can prove that Gupta is a shill for anyone or anything except.....
....for long time good and dependable commentary on prevailing medical questions or events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Please do some research on some of the things he has advocated. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Do research? I didn't style him a shill. Let the shill advocates do the research....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. The "shill" complaint seems to be based on nothing more
than the fact that he owns some stock in health-care companies, and that some health-care companies have bought advertising on his health-care-related show. I think that's a very weak case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. CNN may now find more positive views of the Obama Administration...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Regardless of those who oppose him
He is a very popular TV doctor. He has a great deal of credibility with many people. If he agrees to advocate for Obama's health care reforms(if that is even in his job description) people will listen to him. If he takes the position and happens to disagree with Obama's health care reforms chances are he will show restraint and not be too critical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. Ask them for one example of where Gupta's advocated for a poor medical decision.
You won't get one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. For profit health insurance does make make for good medical decisions
nor does not being able to afford to see a doctor.

Gupta advocates for the current system which is placing the health of Americans in danger.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC