Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study: Premarital abstinence pledges are ineffective

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 07:44 PM
Original message
Study: Premarital abstinence pledges are ineffective

Study: Premarital abstinence pledges are ineffective

A cornerstone of many abstinence-only programs is the concept of virginity pledges, which encourages “children as young as 9 to promise to wait until marriage to have sex.” But a new study from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health finds that “teenagers who pledge to remain virgins until marriage are just as likely to have premarital sex as those who do not promise abstinence and are significantly less likely to use condoms and other forms of birth control when they do”:

The new analysis of data from a large federal survey found that more than half of youths became sexually active before marriage regardless of whether they had taken a “virginity pledge,” but that the percentage who took precautions against pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases was 10 points lower for pledgers than for non-pledgers.

“Taking a pledge doesn’t seem to make any difference at all in any sexual behavior,” said Janet E. Rosenbaum of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, whose report appears in the January issue of the journal Pediatrics. “But it does seem to make a difference in condom use and other forms of birth control that is quite striking.”

Rosenbaum’s study isn’t the first to indicate that virginity pledges are ineffective. In 2005, a study by Yale and Columbia University researchers found that “adolescents who pledge to remain virgins until marriage are more likely to substitute high-risk sexual behaviors that increase the likelihood of transmitting sexually transmitted diseases.”




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. From the Department of NFS
And Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health?

So biased. And librul.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. To that I can only say, "Duh!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whoooda thunkit???11!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanderBeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unfortunately, this probably won't mean the end of "Purity Balls"


http://www.glamour.com/sex-love-life/2007/01/purity-balls

There are aspects of religion that I find totally depressing/hilarious. This is one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Purity balls"? They wouldn't say that if they saw....
...aw, nevermind.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oh no...do go on!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Alas, no sex threads on DU.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Probably wise.
As a relative latecomer to DU I've always wondered what horrors must have prompted that rule. Skating around it with subterfuge is fun, though! :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. One would hope
that this comes as no surprise. Teen age kids will do what they have always done. Lecture them all you wish, you will still obtain the same result. It is not like parents just started to discourage this behavior. Evidence would suggest that parents have been trying this or similar approaches for hundreds of years if not thousands, and obtaining the same result.

It is just the wrong lesson. The lesson is values, not rules. No amount of rules or innovative means to teach them can ever substitute for simple values lessons. With values lessons, kids are empowered to make good decisions on their own. The simple facts of life are that kids will make these decisions on their own, whether we approve or not. Values that help them make the decisions well, and at least protect themselves if they proceed, is all a parent can ever hope to do.

Sooner or later, nearly all kids will be making decisions independently. If you can impart the tools to make the decisions well, you have done all you can ever do as a parent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Bingo!
I have been working in the public schools for almost 20 years, and those boys and girls that have better self esteem, make better (and healthier) choices. Give em love, boundaries, and decision making tools - usually, they use them.

The abstinence curriculum's are a total joke - just look at the eye rolls when ever you have a frank talk with teens about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Didn't work for me. Course, I never took the pledge.
My 32-year-old daughter is testament to the '70s.

Sure had fun, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder how many pledges Bristol Palin made? n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. this is related to the President????
what am I missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Next study to be released: "Water is Wet"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC