Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NEWSFLASH: OBAMA HAS BEEN AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE FROM THE START

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:51 PM
Original message
NEWSFLASH: OBAMA HAS BEEN AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE FROM THE START
Wake up and pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did he equate gay marriage with pedophilia?
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 06:53 PM by Starbucks Anarchist
Because Rick Warren did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. warren is a fundie
his true feelings he wouldnt even say in front of a camera or his flock

I think the LBGT didnt pay attention to Obama's platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Nobody here claimed Obama was for gay marriage.
But we should all be offended that he picked such a homophobic (among other things) bigot to give the invocation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. Whatr on earth makes you think that? Because they voted for him anyway, like we heteros begged
them to do? What were their realistic alternatives? McCain Palin? Most everyone here knew Obama's positions very well. Does that mean we can never criticize him for his positions? What is your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is a difference between being "against gay marriage" and
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 06:53 PM by Evergreen Emerald
a bigot who equates mutual love with f'ing a dog or molesting a child.

Edited to clean up the language (a tad).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Obama doesnt equal Warren
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 06:54 PM by deadlyaj
anyone who makes that correlation is stupid and shouldn't be allowed out of the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. anyone who thinks that is the issue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
54. guess what?
deep down, there isn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama was also against Prop 8
which Warren supported

go back to your bridge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Or he's been playing politics with the issue - either way, it's up to us...
to educate him. He said he wants to surround himself with people who dare to disagree!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Hes been against gay marriage from the start of his run for prez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. What I mean is, he may not actually be against it, but for political purposes...
...he takes that position ~ I doubt that most Dems are against it in their hearts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
35. And?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. The only candidate who was FOR gay marriage was Dennis Kucinich
And he dropped out by the end of January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why didnt the LBGT Community express their support for him as fervant as the anti warren stuff..
this all seems a little crazy to me. Its not like Obama is doing anything we didnt think he would do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Damned if I know.
But I don't presume to speak for the LGBT Community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. They DID, you dolt.
The LGBT community gave time, money, blood, sweat and tears to his campaign.... which is WHY they are so hurt and offended at the pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Obama isnt anti gay
“While we have come a long way since the Stonewall riots in 1969, we still have a lot of work to do. Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us. But at its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans. It’s about whether this nation is going to live up to its founding promise of equality by treating all its citizens with dignity and respect.”

— Senator Barack Obama


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. No shit.
But he's giving a voice to a hateful misogynistic bigot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. he is a bigot, yup.
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 07:11 PM by deadlyaj
That bigot is still american and he has to be a president to all people. I honestly thing its a brilliant move. Any antiObama gay fervor just brings more right leaning people into the obama fold. The gay community isnt NOT going to support Obama in the end so by them screaming it only brings more center rights into the obama camp. win win

The fundies on the right wing love this shit

The left and right been using the gay community as a political tool for generations. Must suck to be be used like that, but reality sucks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. You could not be more wrong. Next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. {"Must suck to be be used like that, but reality sucks" -- so speaks the Republican for Obama
You must be one of those Compassionate Republicans I hear so much about.

:eyes:

This post is one of the most repulsive things I've read on here today.

Wanna bet there isn't a real possibility that "the gay community isnt NOT going to support Obama in the end"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #20
56. Oh, we're going to support Obama in the end eh?
Why, because you said so?

"Must suck to be be used like that, but reality sucks."

No, cynical, apathetic political parasites suck. Is that you, Frank Luntz?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. I may have misread,
I think the poster was asking why the GLBT community didn't express their support for DK as fervently as against the choice of Warren.

My opinion on that is because GLBT wanted someone who could actually WIN...(DK will never be president)...and be in a position to take up the cause.

As offensive as this choice was - to GLBT and women, in particular, (and to liberal people of faith as well) - we have no choice but to continue to believe President Obama will be that someone.

I am desperately hoping that this will prove to have been what I think it is...a huge fucked up mistake. I really don't think it is an indication of how he will govern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. You knew he was going to pick Warren to give the invocation? Huh. I didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
46. Why don't some stright people attack Warren as firmly as they defend his invite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I still voted for him. One of the main reasons, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. nonononononononononononono no.
He personally defines marriage as between a man and a woman.

As a legislator, he defends the rights of same sex couples to marry.

Do some homework before posting your all caps BS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Obama believes in civil unions not right to marry. dont mix words, two totally dif things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. what the hell do you know about it?
you and your all caps madness.....

He will not prevent any gay couples from marrying, he's not against gay marriage, he is for equal rights for LGBT couples, that's what matters.

He personally believes that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
40. Sadly, I think you are mistaken. However, it does not matter what he thinks, as long as
he does not believe in interfering with the states. And the real bottom line is what his appointees to the SCOTUS think. For those appointments alone, it was worth every dime of donations and every hour of volunterring to defeat McCain Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. You are incorrect sir
he does not believe in same sex civil marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Obama Pride
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. what a crock of shit. a pride group named after somebody
who is against gay marriage. please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Its there lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. He will not allow legislation preventing it.
He does not personally believe that marriage as an institution is other than between a man and a woman.

It's the difference between one's personal beliefs and how one legislates.

It's actually a nice example of how a good leader can separate personal feelings from his or her sense of the right thing to do for all people, or to support certain legislation despite a conflict with one's religious beliefs.

The only analogy that comes to mind would be a governor who personally abhors the death penalty signing a capital punishment warrant.

I wish I could think of an example that wasn't so dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Here's another example for you
a legislator who personally doesn't believe in mixed race marriages but is benevolent enough not to legislate against them.

See? That wouldn't be bigoted at all, it would be an example of an enlightened good leader.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #30
42. Marriage is an issue for the states, not the feds. Further, Presidents don't legislate. Congress
does. Presidents can veto legilslation, though. The most critical thing here are SCOTUS appointments. That is the ball game when it comes to equal rights. And SCOTUS appointees don't have to worry about re-election, like Presidents, Governors and legislators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. Repeal of DOMA is for the Feds and PE Obama promised it's repeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. Agreed. But the feds should never have touched marriage in the first place, just as they should
never have butt into the Schiavo case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. The problem with bad laws and half measures like CU's is
they have to be repealed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
49. How about abortion?
no sarcasm.

Plenty are morally and personally opposed and wouldn't have one themselves but are pro-choice candidates.

Ahem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #49
58. People who are pro-choice support laws that let the individual decide. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. Warren is going to talk for 2 1/2 minutes, the last
I checked we still have freedom of speech. What is it, if we disagree with someone they can't speak, we have gone through that type of thinking for the last 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
27. NEWSFLASH: IT STILL PISSES ME OFF.
I voted for him, supported him throughout the primaries, and I'm damn glad that he won. But I am still pissed off that he wimps out on the most prominent American civil rights issue of today. And I am super pissed off when he honors bigots by giving them prominent roles on Inauguration Day.

Is that okay with you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. No news there. Obama and Biden are for equivalent rights but not calling it marriage
that was clear in the debates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Not true. He was against prop 8 and said so.
Gay marriage was legal in California. Prop 8 repealed it. How is that not being supportive of gay marriage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
48. "I detest the bashing and vilifying of gays" - Barrack Obama
"OBAMA: Well, to answer the original question, I would love that child and seek to support them. ...I detest the bashing and vilifying of gays and lesbians. Most gays and lesbians are seeking basic recognition of their rights so they’re not discriminated against in employment or renting a house, so they can see their partner in a hospital. These are rights for everybody, not just some people.

Source: Illinois Senate Debate #3: Barack Obama vs. Alan Keyes Oct 21, 2004 "

Warren has vilified and bashed gays, comparing same sex marriage to pedophelia and bestiality.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
32. Thanks for the condescension. And your point is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
give-me-liberty Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. OBAMA is wrong on Gay Marriage
as wrong as the KKK were to burn crosses in many of Michelle Obama's ancestor's yards...

let's get this straight (no pun intended), Obama will regret the day he ever uttered those words because he will feel bad for all the violence this brought onto the LGBT community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. Awesome! Republican for Obama is back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
39. OMG - WE'RE BEING INVADED BY AOL USERS!
And they forgot to turn off all caps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadlyaj Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. sorry, just a little sick of all this outrage about Warren. It missed the mark on the whole scope
of gay issues and we need more attention towards anti discrimination for the people -- not fake outrage over a 2 min prayer

gmafb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
45. NEWSFLASH: OBAMA WAS AGAINST HATE8
Warren was for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. Correct. Thank you. How many times does this need
to be posted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Apparently infinitely. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
55. You would think a constitutional scholar would understand the 14th Amendment.
You would also think that a constitutional scholar (and an African American one at that) would get the concept of why "separate but equal" doesn't nut it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Politician first, scholar second.
Or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #55
59. maybe what he doesn't understand is homosexuality . . .
and, therefore, gay marriage . . .

and maybe one of the best uses of our time and energy in the next few months could be educating him about both topics and why it is so important that he understand them better . . .

and maybe we should also emphasize that, even if his religious beliefs cause him to personally oppose gay marriage, those beliefs should be kept out of his public policy considerations . . .

and maybe he'll surprise us . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC