Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's grades at Columbia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:29 PM
Original message
Obama's grades at Columbia
I'm guessing that Obama's grades at Columbia were around 3.0-3.3, since he did not graduate with honors (I think back then, at Columbia University, you had to be over 3.3 in order to graduate with honors). Since Obama was nevertheless admitted to Harvard Law School, I seriously doubt he had a 2.X GPA. I'm going to estimate that he was a few points shy of 3.3.

Anyway, my point is not to do a knee-jerk Freeper move and accuse Obama of unfairly gaining his place at Harvard Law. My point is if a guy like Obama can just be an average student in college, yet still excel not only at Harvard Law but in later (and more important) endeavors, then is there any meaningful value of college GPAs? I say this as a junior undergraduate who has just finished finals, and grade inflation has recently become a hot topic at my school. I find myself bemoaning the two B's I got in freshman year that could've so easily been A's because it would've pushed my GPA up a full tenth of a point. I feel like a below-average schmuck just because a number that supposedly measures how good of a learner I am is not as good as I want it to be.

Is GPA meaningless? Is undergraduate education meaningless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Undergraduate education is CRITICAL to a broad understanding of the world
GPA.... is mostly meaningless.

For example, my soils professor graded ON THE CURVE. In a class of 14 students, there would be 1 F, 2 D's, 2 B's, an A... and a LOT of C's.

I worked harder for some of those C's than I worked for A's in lesser classes. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. GPA is important for getting into grad school.
Especially if you want an assistanceship. Otherwise it's completely meaningless in most fields. I've never had a potential employer ask me what my GPA was. No one cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's not just your GPA that will gets you into Harvard.
A tremendous factor determining which Graduate School you will be accepted to has to do with with which college you graduated from.
Obama graduated from Columia University, one of the very few Ivy League schools in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Also, his LSAT's had to be very high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. His professors have said publicly he is brilliant.
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 09:54 PM by AtomicKitten
Off the charts, in fact. Probably had something to do with it. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Grades won't mean crap in this country until we have a Public discussion of STANDARDS.
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 09:37 PM by patrice
I taught highschool seniors for four years. I also taught junior college students. My Master's was on the subject of comparing curriculum to standards to identify any relationships. One of the things I found was grade inflation over appx the last 25 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Remember, he went to Occidental for 2 years before tranferring to Columbia
I'm sure he had nearly straight A's to transfer to Columbia. So those two years will inflate his overall GPA up for admission into Harvard Law School. He also did pretty well on the LSAT and he had a great experience as a community organizer before going to law school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Right --
I forgot to mention his experience as a Community Organizer,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. I graduated with high honors from a large Midwestern University
Only reason I got in was because of my GPA in high school, which put me in the top 105 of my class, so I know GPA is important for getting into college. I was later able to acquire an advanced degree with highest honors. However, I don't see any of these feats really helping me with my life and career choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Presidentcokedupfratboy Donating Member (994 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. My GPA wasn't great
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 09:42 PM by Presidentcokedupfrat
Only a 2.7 - But I did get into Grad School for Library Science at Columbia. My grades improved every year, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. I've attended five different colleges,
and from two of them I have a 4.0. I've never applied to grad school, and no one has ever cared what my GPA was.

Grade inflation really is a problem at many of the best schools in this country. I'm very proud of my 21 year old son, currently a senior at the University of Tulsa, who has taken at least two, maybe three classes from an instructor who basically does not give out A's. He's learned a lot from her, and I'm so glad he hasn't just wanted to protect his GPA, which is an easy thing to do.

I do expect that the graduate schools out there know which colleges have rampant grade inflation and which don't, just as the colleges understand from your high school transcripts if you took tough classes, such as honors and AP classes. This is also where the standardized tests matter, because it tends to level the playing field by showing how you did compared to a very large pool of others who took the test, such as the GRE or the MCAT or whatever they all are for getting into grad schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. I guess I had better not ever run for office
My undergrad GPA was a 2.3

Hey, it was the 70s. I partied. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brooklyns_Finest Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. Federal Government
If you want to get in to the federal government at a GS7 instead of a GS5 you have to have over a 3.0 GPA. THat is about a $10k difference in pay. The gov also has outstanding scholars programs, where people with high undergrad GPA's can get in to agencies such as CIA, DIA, Energy, etc without going through the competative process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. Undergrad degrees are meaningless as free-standing items....
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 10:07 PM by BlooInBloo
Too much of what we tell undergrads is simply false.

On top of that, the vast majority of undergrads are in idiot-majors anyway.

The lsat and mcat are good measures of intellectual horsepower. The gre used to be, until they grossly dumbed it down. The others are tests I would expect a middle school student to well on.


EDIT: Classics majors excepted. That's the only major I know of that pretty much guarantees you're not an idiot, even at the undergrad level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. FYI, he didn't even check the box on his Harvard Law application
I know that's not the point of your post but I just thought I'd point it out, lest anyone use this to call him a product of affirmative action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Columbia is an incredibly difficult school. It's hard enough to get in.
Then Obama went to Harvard Law and was editor of the Review. This is the top of the pinnacle in law.

Obama's academic credentials are brilliant. Very, very few people have achieved at his level in academics and politics. He's probably one of the smartest people ever elected to the U.S. presidency, if not the smartest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Not at the undergraduate level though
No doubt that he achieved much at Harvard, but in Columbia, he wasn't a great or notable student.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Just getting into Columbia and graduating from there is a high achievement.
It's known as the school for nerds even among Ivy Leaguers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I didn't get above a 3.0 cumulative until the last qtr of my senior year....
And I was chosen as my school's "outstanding graduate" for that year (or some silly name like that). I then proceeded to get a phd from one of the best 2 or 3 grad programs in the world.

The problem is the measuring stick you're using. It's the one that idiots typically use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. What was your major?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Philosophy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. What years were you there?
Columbia College in the late 1960s was radicalized and academics were not important.
Later, Columbia College remained all male when the other ivies became co-ed. This hurt recruitment terribly in 1970s. I'm not sure when but I believe Columbia College did not go co-ed until sometime in the 1980s.

Contrary to your representations, Columbia College does provide a rigorous academic environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. It really does. (rigorous)
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 11:49 PM by Genevieve
Columbia made my years at NYU feel like grade school.
(And NYU is a very competitive schooll)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Um, what the hell are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. GPA may be important for your first couple jobs, but after that not so much
Grades are most certainly not meaningless, nor is your undergraduate education. I think it is good of you to pay attention to your grades - it helps keep your nose to the grindstone!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Could I see support for your statements?
I thought you needed at least 3.5 to graduate with honors of any kind. I don't know about COlumbia at that time.
Further, Columbia may have had some kind of rule regarding the number of credits you earned at COlumbia to be eligible for honors, regardless of gpa.
I sincerely doubt that he was admitted to Harvard Law with less than 3.5 gpa at Columbia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I looked at Columbia's current policy
College (Latin) Honors
The Bachelor of Arts degree is awarded with honors in three categories (cum laude, magna cum laude, summa cum laude) to no more than 25 percent of the graduating class, with no more than 5 percent summa cum laude, and the total of summa and magna cum laude not exceeding 15 percent. College honors is the highest academic recognition awarded by the College. The Committee on Honors, Awards, and Prizes reviews the academic records of the top 35% of the graduating class. Selection is based not on GPA alone, but on the breadth, depth and high quality of academic achievement, departmental recommendations, and outstanding academic work beyond that which is required for the degree. Students may not apply for honors nor may they solicit faculty for recommendations in this process.

There is no separate consideration of honors for October or February graduates. Each spring the Committee on Honors, Awards, and Prizes considers the October and February graduates along with those who are degree candidates for May. The report of those graduating with honors is in the May Class Day program. The honor is noted on the diploma and transcript. October and February graduates may ask the Registrar to add an honors notation to an already issued diploma.

http://www.college.columbia.edu/bulletin/programs_of_study

This indicates that honors is not based on GPA alone. If Obama didn't graduate with honors, it was because he earned half his academic credits at a less rigorous college and Columbia preferred to give the honor to someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Colleges change their policies on that frequently...
So I would not be surprised if there was a different metric in the 80's when Obama graduated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. My point is that the OP has nothing to support his suppositions
He pulled this stuff out of his ass and that really bothers me. I at least consulted the current policy to show why I think he is full of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. Columbia is a notoriously difficult undergraduate school and does not inflate grades
But yea I'm in the same boat as you are in terms of grades. I'll probably wind up with a 3.7 by the time I graduate and I'm worried that won't be good enough to get me into a good PhD program. I know there are a lot of other factors considered but I feel like I can't compete, especially since grade inflation is prominent at other schools and I happen to go to one that (like Columbia) does not have grade inflation. Also I'm really peeved about the fact that we have +'s and -'s instead of just A, B, C, D, F like some schools do. If it was just a 90+ is an A and an 80+ was a B I could have maximized my efforts such that my GPA would be no less than 3.8 (4 A's and a B) in any given semester and 4.0 in a lot of semesters. Instead I have to worry about getting a 93 or higher instead of a 92 in my classes if I want an A and getting a 93 or higher requires near perfection in some cases (depending on whether or not the class is curved).

Plus, I think that college and graduate admissions were simply less competitive when Obama was applying than they are today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
31. It's harder to get a high GPA as an undergraduate than in a grad program,
in my experience. I barely cleared 3.0 getting my BA at Reed (after which grad school was almost easy): 3.03, if I remember right. But I got one B and I think three A-minuses in (this is the part I'm not proud of) 13 years of graduate school - all my other letter grades were As.

So it's not surprising to me that Obama would have gotten better grades even in a program as rigorous as Harvard Law, especially if he did his undergradute work at Columbia, which is certainly not a bad school if you have to go to college on the east coast.;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC