Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rick Warren is a Southern Baptist. Saddleback is a Southern Baptist church.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:52 AM
Original message
Rick Warren is a Southern Baptist. Saddleback is a Southern Baptist church.
Here's what Southern Baptists believe:

http://www.sbc.net/aboutus/basicbeliefs.asp


Please note the subservience of women and the equating of homosexuality with adultery and pornography. Oh, and official anti-choice position.

Yeah, there was just NO ONE else who could've given the invocation. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. So are we supposed to hate the baptists now?
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 10:54 AM by Bleachers7
Someone tell Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. The shining epitomy of the Religious Hardright is the ..
SOUTHERN Baptist CONVENTION.

They don't represent all Baptists (e.g. the American Baptists), but they do represent the WORST of American religious beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Enough already
Why, in 2008, do we even have to have a representative of any organized superstition involved at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Because most people are "superstitious"
Including most of the people that voted for Obama,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Come on. I am very religious, not "superstitious" but I think religion should not
be involved in politics at all. Just because someone is religious does not mean they want it in the political process, i think it has been used as a weapon instead of for good and there is that separation of church and state thingie. But to put down people for being religious is kind of not cool. And I think Obama's choice of Rick Warren is not a good thing either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. And on the 8th day, God made the DU "hide thread" button. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. lol
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Heh. I tried hide thread yesterday. Every time I hid one thread
5 more popped up that were hide-worthy.

After 30 minutes of doing nothing but hide thread, I gave up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. that's worth noting
I suspect the idea that there are *denominations* with *official positions* on things would come as a surprise to a lot of megachurch Christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. A lot of megachurches like to keep their denominational connections a secret.
But Saddleback is a member of the SBC, and Warren's standing is with the SBC. And the SBC doesn't countenance dissent. If you're an SBC pastor, you believe these things. Warren is an SBC pastor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
45. Precisely, Mycritters2.
I did quite a bit of research on the Southern Baptists when my in-laws went nuts and joined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marimour Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks for letting me know what I believe.
I guess I'm now a pro-life, anti-women, anti-gay woman. Southern baptists are more than just members of that group. My Atlanta baptist church isn't a part of that delegation but I am a Southern Baptist. Actually most churches I see in the south are Baptist churches. Don't make assumptions based on what the leaders of one group, who don't represent the majority of southern baptists believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. The site he is linking to is the site for the Southern Baptist Convention which is an organization..
...and probably one of the biggest Southern Baptist organizations, if not THE biggest. They do have an official doctrine and their official doctrine is exactly what the OP said it was. You may be a Baptist from the south but that does not make you a member of the Southern Baptist Convention. Context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marimour Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. and being a member of the SBC does not mean your current pastor believes those things.
It means the pastor who was pastor when the church joined the SBC believed those things. My pastor disagrees with some of the official positions of our Black Baptist convention but hes not just going to leave one that we have been a member of for almost 100 years. He just doesn't preach those things in our church. He never preaches about homosexuality or abortion. He lets people make their own decisions about those issues and just leads as an example of tolerance by welcoming openly gay members. I highly doubt that all SBC pastors use their pulpits as outlets for hate either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. I grew up in the bible belt, MOST Christian leaders I knew believe its a sin to be gay...
...of course some of them also believed it was a sin to listen to rock music.

Regardless, I think its safe to say that "homosexuality is a sin" is an idea that a vast number of Christians in this country share.

This is one of the reasons I'm not a Christian anymore, I just can't buy into the obsession with controlling people's personal lives.

Of course there are pastors that are exceptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. If your church belongs to a black Baptist convention, you're not SBC.
There are almost no blacks in the SBC. Indeed, it was founded on, and split with northern Baptists because of, its support of slavery. Your church is probably a member of the National Baptist Convention, the Progressive National Baptist Convention, or the Missionary Baptist Church, all of which allow for MUCH more dissent than the Southern Baptist Convention. The SBC was taken over by conservatives in the 70's and 80's. They drove liberals out, declared once ordained women no longer clergy, and started making statements on social issues they had once left to individual conscience--like gender equality, glbt issues, abortion. They also, for the first time ever REQUIRED clergy and member churches to affirm doctrinal statements, something other Baptist denominations find absolutely anathema. Roger Williams founded the Baptist Church to have no creedal tests. In this, the SBC has broken with its Baptist roots.

If your church belongs to one of the black Baptist conventions, it may be a Baptist church in the South, but it is not a Southern Baptist Church. I have nothing but respect for Baptists other than the SBC, having graduated from an American Baptist seminary myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. You are not SBC at all
unless you are a member of a denomination that in 1968 only had 11% of their congregations allow African Americans to worship with them. A denomination that came to exist as seperate from other Baptists largely as a pro-slavery pro-white supremacy statement. A denomination that 'apologized' for the racism and pro-slavery stance in 1989, or so. Not 1889, 19.
Is that the denomination to which you belong? That is the denomination that Warren belongs to, and he has clearly said he is proud of the history of his denomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
47. That's fine, EXCEPT ...
if you are affiliated with a parent organization, you and your church kick money up to that organization. In my humble opinion, it is morally reprehensible to kick money up to the Southern Baptist Convention. If a person is a part of an organization that kicks money up to a hardright, anti-female, anti-GLBTQ organization, then they have to take responsibility for that.

That's why I'm a Unitarian-Universalist; I'm proud of the stands National takes (www.uua.org).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
50. Some denominations enforce uniformity rigidly, others do not

The SBC does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yep. Just like Catholics, Southern Baptists are pretty diverse in their
beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. To be ordained, Southern Baptist pastors are required to affirm these beliefs.
To hold membership in the SBC, churches must also state these beliefs. Individual lay people may differ, but churches and pastors are required to affirm these beliefs. The SBC is more rigid in this way than nearly any other Protestant denomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
51. Not all Baptists in the South are "Southern Baptists" - It is a specific group

It's sort of like flying on United and Delta and saying that you flew "American Airlines".

Well, yes you did, but not THE American Airlines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. "That group" is the Southern Baptist Convention. And unlike other Baptist groups
which do allow for dissent, if your church is a member of the Southern Baptist Convention, it has officially agreed to these statements. You may not personally believe these things, but your pastor and your church do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
43. Part of the SBC, though?
That is their stand on those issues, is it not? I mean, that's why Jimmy Carter left, isn't it?

I guess I'm looking for some clarification here - is your church part of the SBC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
49. A lot of people confuse southern Baptists with the SBC

Yes, there are a lot of Baptist churches in the south. Most of them are independent congregations or aligned with smaller denominational groups than "The" "Southern Baptist Convention".

Unfortunately because of the name, a lot of people do not understand the difference between (a) a church which is Baptist and in the south, and (b) A Southern Baptist (TM) Church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. Actually, most white Baptist churches in the south ARE SBC.
It's the largest Protestant denomination in this country, with relatively few churches in the North. It has a HUGE presence in the South. NOt all Baptist churches in the South are SBC, but the vast majority of white ones, at least, are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. Here's what a commentator for the Roman Catholic Church has to say about the subject
This pretty well covers the major issues that are being discussed in the various Rick Warren threads.

http://www.catholic.org/politics/story.php?id=31157
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. The "homosexual equivalency movement"?
Scary stuff that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. This is what we are up against
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 12:18 PM by slackmaster
The RCC has the attention of a lot of people. Catholics are not sheep who always do as they are told, but the church has a great deal of influence.

We have a lot of teaching to do, and screaming "Bigot!" in their faces is NOT how we will win this war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Neither will inviting them to our important moments.
The gay community needs to be radicalized and make its voice heard. Now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. The Presidential inauguration is an important moment for all of us
Not just the gay community, or Democrats, or people who voted for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Where are the racists and anti-semites? Oh, right. Only hatred of gays and women is acceptable. n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. That's different, you know....
"I understand MSNBC has suspended Mr. Imus," Obama told ABC News, "but I would also say that there's nobody on my staff who would still be working for me if they made a comment like that about anybody of any ethnic group."
"He didn't just cross the line," Obama said. "He fed into some of the worst stereotypes that my two young daughters are having to deal with today in America. The notions that as young African-American women -- who I hope will be athletes -- that that somehow makes them less beautiful or less important. It was a degrading comment. It's one that I'm not interested in supporting."


Because a joker's words have more impact than a preacher on the Presidential stage, you see. And because you are right. Obama accepts hatred towrard us that he does not accept toward others.
Does he not know that other kids are hearing Warren's hate as a personal attack? And seeing Obama support that bigotry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. This reminds me of the anti-Kennedy religious arguments.
Not equating Warren to Kennedy, of course, but this type of argument is the exact same as the ones launched against Kennedy for being Catholic. "Catholics believe that the Pope is the supreme authority! The President can't be subservient to a foreign power! Catholics believe that all nations are part of the Church! We can't be turning our foreign policy over to a religion! That would violate the Constitution!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Except that those statements were either bullshit or misstating Catholic doctrine.
I've linked directly to the SBC page. This really IS what they believe.

That, and Warren isn't running for President. Yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. no, there's a significant difference
Instead of comparing Warren to Kennedy, you should be comparing Warren to a Catholic priest or bishop.

If Kennedy had chosen a Catholic bishop to speak at his inauguration, everyone would assume that the bishop agreed with official Catholic positions. Similarly, if Obama chooses a Southern Baptist pastor to speak at his inauguration, it's not crazy to assume that the pastor agrees with official Southern Baptist positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. Warrens doctrine speaks for itself and we haven't elected him to anything
and would not.

Warren sees gay civil rights as a moral issue, we see it as a legal issue.

The President elect needs to work on the legal issue, that's his job, we don't need him to be our proxy with evangelicals for outreach, thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. Exactly. Out of the entire U.S. there was only a right wing homophobe ....
He was the ONLY ONE that could've possibly given a speech at Obama's inauguration. That's the real reason Obama picked him. There was no one else available anywhere on the ENTIRE planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I know. Stunning, isn't it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. To say I'm disappointed is an understatement. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Not only that, the guy is under 50 years old
As a senior citizen, I am outraged!

This could be worse for our country than Y2K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. Here's what Rick Warren believes
The invited guest honoring our new President Elect.

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/12/16/7415

"Rick Warren: But the issue to me is, I’m not opposed to that as much as I’m opposed to the redefinition of a 5,000-year definition of marriage. I’m opposed to having a brother and sister be together and call that marriage. I’m opposed to an older guy marrying a child and calling that a marriage. I’m opposed to one guy having multiple wives and calling that marriage.

Steven Waldman: Do you think, though, that they are equivalent to having gays getting married?

Rick Warren: Oh I do. …"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. And that's acceptable to a surprising number of DUers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
24. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
30. The SBC article about Warren being chosen:
http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=29535&ref=BPNews-RSSFeed1218
Gay activists outraged over Warren invite

<snip>
"I'm encouraged that President-elect Obama would select Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at his inauguration," Land told Baptist Press. "First, it is a signal that President-elect Obama is going to employ a big-tent philosophy in his administration's approach to people who may disagree with them on some issues, but not others. His selection of Rick Warren indicates that people who disagree with the president-elect on sanctity of life issues are not automatically persona non grata at the White House in an Obama administration. It also indicates that the president-elect is not buying the radical homosexual activists' argument that anyone who opposes them on the gay marriage issue should be ostracized as a bigot."



Bolding is mine. Bottom line: the SBC sees Warren being chosen for this honor as a positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Thanks for the link!
When I read Richard Land's comments I almost puked.

I hope you're doing well. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Hi, tnlefty!
Truly discouraging, isn't it?
Other than a cold, I'm doing great! Hope you're having a good almost-holiday, too. :h:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwei924 Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. Unfortunately, an entire region of the country seems to really like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. Of course he's not buying that bullshit
He himself would be included in that false definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton are Southern Baptists
W and Cheney are Methodists.

The Kennedys are Catholic.

Harry Reid is Mormon.

Your point? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. I thought Carter and Clinton left the SB Convention due to differences with their positions. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. Carter is not Southern Baptist. He's a founding member of the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship.
He left precisely because of people like Rick Warren.

http://www.baptiststandard.com/2000/10_23/pages/carter.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
46. I've seen very few people saying that Warren is a good choice.
What I take issue with is the claim that because of this choice, Obama is no longer worthy of support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
48. Not JUST a Southern Baptist. A Dominionist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. The official position of the SBC is now dominionist. The two things go together. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Eek, I hadn't realized that.
IIRC, Carter (and perhaps others?) left because of the SBC's views on women. I wonder if he is aware of the Dominionist crap??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC