Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If it were the Dalai Lama or the Pope giving a freaking prayer, many would not care...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:38 PM
Original message
If it were the Dalai Lama or the Pope giving a freaking prayer, many would not care...
I mean, I'm sure some people are going to complain regardless of who does what, but I think a lot of people complaining about Warren giving a freaking prayer probably wouldn't care at all if it were some other popular religious figure that isn't an evangelical, despite the fact that just about anyone that is known (including the Pope and the Dalai Lama) have some very un-progressive stances fueled by their own spiritual beliefs.

The guy is going to say a prayer. Big deal. I personally would have preferred TD Jakes, but I also understand why he chose Warren. I think he is probably trying to extend an olive branch to the Evangelical community because they highly opposed him during the election, for the most part. I don't have a problem with this because even though Obama differs politically from the political wing of the Evangelical movement, he is their president too. I also think this goes a long way in pushing the idea that he is a Christian to the people that have doubts about it. He said he was going to be everyone's president and that is what he is doing.

Complaining about cabinet picks is one thing, complaining about actually policies is one thing, complaining about letting someone say what will probably be a completely neutral prayer is a counterproductive overreaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a slap in the face to abortion rights supporters and to gays. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I'm pro-choice and support gay marriage and I don't feel slapped. I guess I'm pragmatic.
Rick Warren's meaningless prayer won't amount to a hill of beans when it comes to impacting President Obama's policy.
Bill Clinton's passing of DOMA is much more of a slap to gays, for example, but does anyone who's outraged about Rick
Warren care about that policy mistake?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. His prayer will be meaningless his presence has GREAT meaning and legitimizes...
Edited on Wed Dec-17-08 05:56 PM by MookieWilson
his form of hate because of the stage he is on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. President Obama promised to be the president of everyone in the U.S. on Nov. 2, 2008
Edited on Wed Dec-17-08 06:35 PM by ClarkUSA
Not just those who are pro-choice or pro-gay marriage. As such, Pastor Warren's presence is pure political symbolism.
If you think it is anything more, then we shall have to agree to disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Pope is anti-gay, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Yet another reason he hasn't been invited to give the invocation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crappyjazz Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for letting us know what we would and/or should care about
I can complete my day now

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Pope is anti-gay too, what's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackeens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd have a MAJOR problem if it was the Pope! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Me too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Having Warren give the prayer is holding an olive branch
out to those on the "other side". Obama is wise to treat those who oppose him in this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes he is. But this is not the time or the place. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Obama needs to start reaching out to gays. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. First of all, Warren wasn't choen by Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. You seriously believe the PE has no say in his own inauguration?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. He's a showbiz charleton. There is a world of other clerics he could have chosen. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Yes, and look what Warren has to stay -
Rick Warren: But the issue to me is, I知 not opposed to that as much as I知 opposed to the redefinition of a 5,000-year definition of marriage. I知 opposed to having a brother and sister be together and call that marriage. I知 opposed to an older guy marrying a child and calling that a marriage. I知 opposed to one guy having multiple wives and calling that marriage.

Steven Waldman: Do you think, though, that they are equivalent to having gays getting married?

Rick Warren: Oh I do.

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/12/16/7415

Who could possibly disagree? And his stance on abortion is equally moderate! He's against it even when the life of the mother is at risk. What could be more humane? And his views on evolution are so inclusive.

Really, it's a shame that a handful of drama queens are ruining the fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Yeah, 'cause Bill Clinton's olive branch to the corporations has gone over
so WELL here at DU.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. TD Jakes is a homophobe, too. And hugely intolerant of differing opinions.
He treated Carlton Pearson like crap, because of a change in opinion. I'd be just as upset by TD Jakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Not only a homophobe, but a crook as well.
The "prosperity gospel" heresy is, in its way, as ugly as Warren's bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. I would've preferred Carlton Pearson. An inclusive message
from someone who knows the challenges of taking an unpopular stand.

http://www.newdimensions.us/content.cfm?id=2014
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's about principles
And in your Presidential Inauguration, of all places, you should stand on your principles. That would include NOT inviting the Pope or any anti-gay, anti-woman Catholic to do the Invocation. There are plenty of progressive Catholics out there too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Right is equally outraged. They feel Warren should recuse himself,
that he is praying for an abortionist, one who believes in infanticide, etc. They want Warren "shunned", etc. They're saying he is an opportunist of major proportions and are outraged he would condone to participating in the inauguration of the anti-Christ Muslim. So there you have it, the GLBT and Evangelical Fundamentalist communities agree. I have written myself to change.gov, and to be honest I do think Warren will be pulled out. I love Joe Lowery and hope he's the one chosen to give the prayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Lowery is giving the benediction, which is less of a spot light than the prayer.
The whole thing is disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. LOL, I knew I was gonna get slammed. Name me 1 person in the past 50 yrs that meets your approval.
Come on. Lets hear it.

And I'm sure no current prominent religious figure would meet your approval either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. "LOL" - - laugh it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Rev. William G. Sinkford
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
22. Imagine complaining about this! Why, the man is practically a saint.
Rick Warren: But the issue to me is, I知 not opposed to that as much as I知 opposed to the redefinition of a 5,000-year definition of marriage. I知 opposed to having a brother and sister be together and call that marriage. I知 opposed to an older guy marrying a child and calling that a marriage. I知 opposed to one guy having multiple wives and calling that marriage.

Steven Waldman: Do you think, though, that they are equivalent to having gays getting married?

Rick Warren: Oh I do.

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/12/16/7415

People who complain about little things like this are just drama queens. Don't you agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. The point is that Warren is a political ACTIVIST
who just supported Prop 8 vocally. He equates gay people to pedophiles and practioners of inscest. And he does so with a clearly political agenda. This Prop 8 passed the same night Obama won. This is current news. It is as if Obama is celebrating Prop 8's passage along with his own victory.

My family is not here to be used as a tool to promote Barack's image with the right wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. having the Dalai llama do it would have been so cool!

but then China would freak out. Sigh. Why doesn't Obama have someone who runs a soup kitchen, or a homeless congregation, give a benediction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
31. Actually, truth be told, all the resident Catholic bashers would have a field day if it was the Pope
Not that I'm anything of a fan of the current pontiff, but like many ordinary Catholic, I'm pragmatic and see both the good and bad in things regarding the church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. The Committee and Obama should've picked...
Dr. Robin Meyers... at the Mayflower UCC in Oklahoma City. He's awesome.
http://www.mayflowerucc.org/staff/meyers.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
33. Wanna fucking bet?
ESPECIALLY if it was the Dalai Lama -- he is a major hhomophobe who preaches peace and tolerance. You know what you're getting with Pope Rat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwlauren35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. TD JAKES??? Who supported Bush in 2004? Tell me you're kidding.
I'm speechless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC