|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Gundam Macross (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 04:47 PM Original message |
Why not Donnie McClurkin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. why don't you send a note to change.gov and ask? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. How about worrying about Obama's views on it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. Your 'concern' is showing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gundam Macross (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Your bias shows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. What bias? Prove it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. Why not Pat Robertson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gundam Macross (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. or Fred Phelps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
6. He was booked. I am now probably safe in saying he was possibly considered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sultana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
7. PUMA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. True. Might as well put the icing on the cake. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. Why not David Duke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-17-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
12. I have no doubt McClurkin is a better person, and has been a Democrat in the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC