Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Politico: Whisper campaign persists despite election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:08 PM
Original message
Politico: Whisper campaign persists despite election
Even with the election decided, the widely debunked whisper campaign claiming that Barack Obama is secretly not an American, and thus not qualified to be president, is going strong.

The Supreme Court is expected to announce on Monday whether or not it will consider two cases contending that Barack Obama is not a "natural born citizen," as the president is required to be under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. One case, referred to the court by Justice Clarence Thomas after Justice David Souter had rejected it, argues that because Obama's father was a citizen of Kenya, at the time a British colony, the president-elect was born with dual citizenship. The other, filed by Attorney Phillip J. Berg, effectively contends that Obama has outright lied about having been born on American soil.

At least four of the court's nine judges must approve before a case is heard, and the great majority of the petitions brought before the Court are dismissed without comment. Still, it's further grist for what's been an active conspiracy mill.

"I think there are just a lot of people who just want to believe it," said Paul Waldman, who has studied the conspiracy theories over Obama's citizenship for Media Matters.

Waldman said that like with the claims that the Clintons killed White House Counsel Vince Foster, a certain segment of the population will continue to believe Obama won on illegitimate grounds no matter how often the claim is disproved.

"When something gets refuted there a certain number of people that just won't believe it," he said. "If they are predisposed to believe it, refuting it will have no impact."

For those who believe the story, Obama's electoral victory is a constitutional and legal crisis of epic proportions that is not being given its fair due in the press or in the courts.

"This is the biggest attempted hoax in the history of our country," insists Berg, whose suit aimed to compel Obama and the Democratic National Committee to produce the candidate's birth certificate and other documents - which he does not believe exist.

Berg, who served as both counsel and plantiff, had his suit dismissed in U.S. district court in October. He then filed a writ of certiorari asking the Supreme Court to take on the case.

The attorney, who identifies himself as a "solid Democrat," believes that "they really have to take a look at it."

"Obama and Howard Dean should all be criminally indicted, tried and criminally jailed," he added.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16257.html

Will the Supreme Court finally put an end to this nonsense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah well, bush lost the election in 2000
and because of the extreme court got to go on and royally fuck our country up.

They can do what they want but Obama's the Prez elect and he will serve his term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is just some crazy bullshit.
Come on now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. politico, wasting everyone's time with a stoopid story to waste
band width. What a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe the Supreme Court should hear this case
Just to put it to rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. doesn't matter
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 07:25 PM by Jake3463
They will insist the judges got gotten to or were afraid of riots by the "blacks"

There is no win with these fucktards...they are doing this out of racism.

Best thing is to ignore them and if anyone brings it up to you show them the truth...if they don't believe it call them a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. That's true
Some will never believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. Nooooo!
Don't give this court any reason to select a Republican president again, because they will do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. What about the Constitutional crisis of stealing the election from the
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 07:18 PM by BrklynLiberal
candidate who got the most votes, and letting the SCOTUS, filled with his father's appointees, handing it over to prez shit-for-brains??
Why weren't these pointy-headed numbskulls willing to let the Supreme Court of Florida's ruling stand???


For those who believe the story, Obama's electoral victory is a constitutional and legal crisis of epic proportions that is not being given its fair due in the press or in the courts.


This makes me even more angry that Gore did not vote with the Congressional Black Caucus. The repukes keep fighting no matter how ridiculous it looks. The Dems give up even when they have a valid battle.

I guess the difference is priorities. The Dems tend to put the REAL Constitution and the country first...the repukes will do anything to win no matter what the cost.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. This reminds me of something funny that Stephen Colbert said last week
"I'm not making this up, folks. I'm just imagining it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. That was great and truly fits this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. No matter how much evidence is shown showing Obama born in Hawaii
The birth certificate nuts will still insist he wasn't born in Hawaii. The reason is racism. Pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. You're right. The notion that Obama is "not one of us" was
pervasive during the McPalin campaign and continues now, only now it's not the politicians pushing it--it's the lunatic fringe. And they are out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. They were never in control
so it's nothing new...these are the people that were convinced Hillary shot Vince Foster personally.

8 years and the only thing they ever got on President Clinton was a cigar and a stained dress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Politico is good at stiring the bullshit pot, ain't they?
They write.....For those who believe the story, Obama's electoral victory is a constitutional and legal crisis of epic proportions that is not being given its fair due in the press or in the courts.

Yep, the same handful of nuts that still support Bush less one or two nutcrackers! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. That's all the folks over
on HCF and CHF have to talk about, poor things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder if considering cases this stupid is a normal thing for them?
If so, we are SOOOO wasting time and money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. IT's standard p[rocedure
A claimant files a writ of certiorari and it is denied by a justice (Souter in this case). The claimant then re-files with another justice. Because the claimant can just go to every justice down the line, the second justice will almost always take it to conference where it is denied. Because ti is denied in conference, there can be no more re-filing. It's dead at this point.

Taking it to conference speeds the process fo killing it and saves everybody's time.

It'll be denied without comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. Yep. It was explained in an earlier thread.
The SCOTUS is almost certainly going to slam the door in the face of the birth certificate conspiracy theorists with a one-sentence judgment refusing to hear the case. Game over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. It won't be over.
there are about another dozen cases pending, and new ones being brought daily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. You know, we laugh at these people, but they're really
messing around with the system. That part pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. In the past eight years, there were over 800 writs of certiorari brought to conference
Just over 60 were accepted.

The load they are adding to the system is minimal, and it'll stop within six months of the inauguration. There have been threats of litigating anything Obama signs, but the first smackdown of that will stop all future attempts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
58. All it takes is for the SCOTUS to shoot down one case...
Then precedent is set, and every other wingnut lawsuit about Obama's birth certificate will be shot down in flames using that precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. they have to look at things that are filed for consideration and then
decide whether to consider them or not. They have hundreds of cases to look at. It's common SCOTUS practice.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Is even Fox News bothering with this story?
And can the Court issue some kind of a decree to stop these nutballs from filing more lawsuits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Gee, let's recycle this story every time some rag runs it
It will be over soon enough I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. I don't why people persist in hyping this


it's simply absurd, beyond absurdity. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. Whiny-assed titty babies of the right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. it's 'going strong' ???...oh really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. I know this is non-sense but I wonder why Obama does not just release his official certificate?
Seems that would put an end to it all. Why let this thing fester?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. He did!
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 08:38 PM by backscatter712
Granted, he did want to protect his privacy - there's enough information to steal his identity. But he broadcasted a redacted image of his birth certificate on the net, and he allowed members of the press, and factcheck.org to examine the real thing. They concluded it's authentic.

The birth certificate myth has been debunked over and over and over again. The real truth is that no amount of proof, no matter how airtight, will satisfy these righttards - they're too badly stuck on stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I mean the actual original.
Some think the copy is forged. I know it's stupid but releasing the original would help satisfy most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
51. What he presented is what Hawaii gave him
HE cannot present anything else. If he made a new request of Hawaii, he'd et another copy just like what he alreayd has but with a different date stamp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yeah, I know. I have seen that. I am satisfied but why not release the original and
end this nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. The original has personal information on it.
It could conceivably be used to steal Obama's identity or otherwise do something nefarious. I can't blame Obama for not releasing pictures without redacting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. The original belongs to the Hawaii Division of Health.
My original birth certificate is in St. Louis County. I couldn't go there and trot out with it if I wanted to. That's why, when I need a copy for a passport, etc., I pay to get a certified copy--like Obama's as seen at the link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I have my original BC from Illinois
Wonder why some states keep them locked up and others don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. And what does Illinois have?
If you have the original, where is their record of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I have no idea. I have the original with little inky foot prints and all.
It old and yellowed but clearly an original.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. I thought I did myself...
but it turns out that what I had was a ceremonial birth certificate the hospital gives to new parents - nifty-looking, but not legally worth squat.

In Colorado, you go down to the state record's office, and they give you a certified copy with the raised seal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Does you ceremonial one have inky feet prints?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
56. It does, as a matter of fact. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. You can bet they have another original then.
;-) But it's really beside the point, because whatever Obama produces isn't good enough for the conspiracy theorists.

Even if he showed them a 47-year-old piece of paper, they'd declare it forged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Some wackos would never be satisfied but a judge would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. A judge would be satisfied with a certified copy, believe me.
But I don't even think that'll be necessary. They'll just keep throwing these cases out.

Also, regarding your question to another poster about the inky footprint document--yes, that is generally a ceremonial piece of paper given to parents in the hospital after the birth of a child. It's not an official birth certificate. You'll understand this better when you have to get a copy of one for a passport, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. You may be right. I can't find it now to verify.
It's too bad this stupid story has drug on so long. I know it's all bogus but I won't feel comfortable until Obama is sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. I think those were issued by hospitals and are not "official"
I have one of those but I remember when I went to college I had to order a copy of my official one from my birth state. It was actually a photocopy meaning a photograph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Yeah, you may be right. I was just now trying to find it but I can't seem to locate it.
It's been a few years and few moves since I last looked at it. Oh well. I am sure this nonsense is going nowhere. It is just surprising how long this stupid story has hung on. I even heard them talking about on c-span this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
59. obama doesn't have to do anything. the burden of proof is on his "accusers."
They are the ones charging him with something, now they need to prove it.
Those who had a valid reason to see his birth certificate, along with everything else to confirm his eligibility to be president, have seen what they needed to see. Who gives a flying fuck what some little whiny-baby ignoramus racist a-holes think anyway? They are little gnats who should be swatted away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. Berg has sued every president for the last 25 years! He needs to
be put down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. Michelle Malkin has said the birth certificate story is Truther crap - that should wake them up
People, you're CRAZIER THAN MICHELLE MALKIN!

I wish everyone would just stop paying attention to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Nope, the Birth Certificate Cultists have thrown Michelle Malkin under the bus
She's a liberal now.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
54. I guess being an 'anchor baby', it hit too close to home for Malkin
She should know what the laws are about being a citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
46. Obama should claim that this suit is causing "irreparable harm" to him
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 09:16 PM by csziggy
Shades of the claims that actually counting the votes in Florida would cause "irreparable harm" to candidate Bush, according to the Supreme Court.

OTOH, maybe the Supremes will decide that they all need to fly to Hawaii to personally examine Obama's birth certificate. I know if I had to live and work in Washington DC in December, I would look for an excuse to go to Hawaii, or the Virgin Islands or some other warm place. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
50. When ya got nothing...use Buffalo Chips...thats the GOP Way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
52. This is another reason why bi-partisanism never works.
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 09:49 PM by political_Dem
Most Republicans are never fair. And while they charm the Dems into including the GOP into some policy making, their shock troops are stirring crap like this up.

It's better to be around allies than being immersed in a toxic stew of rivals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
53. Most pathetic part about all this, you can view it by typing 'Obama birth certificate' into google
Over half the results on the first page of google image searches a picture of Obama's birth certificate that these fanatics claim he refuses to release.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
55. we have a few "solid democrats" here as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
57. Where your parents were born makes no difference.
And the Supreme Court will throw this out without a word. It's not worth anyone's time, much less theirs.

Patently ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC