|
It was that Power of Fear that Orwell was attacking in his books, and it was the same power McCarthy used to the max. All the little thing Orwell saw coming, was NOT the result of some new dogma, but that people would agree to such changes do to their Fear. It was the power of Fear that Orwell saw dictators using, the actual techniques of surveillance and suppression were the RESULT of the power of fear NOT anything else. In fact Orwell was trying to point out that the Power of Fear, as McCarthy and others were and had used, would lead to those abuse of power by the Government AND that most people will support that use do to the power of fear. In affect McCarthy, like Stalin and Hitler, used FEAR as they main means of control of the People and thus the Government. Once the people are fearful then you can do as you please for anything you do, as long as you claim it is to end the fear, is perfectly all right with the voters.
The problem with this is once the fear is gone, then such dictatorships fall, thus such dictatorships ALWAYS cite fear, even if they have to produce it themselves (As Hitler's Storm Troopers did in the early 1930s). This fear is always against someone, preferably someone who is outside the country so that any damage the GOVERNMENT permit is directed in a way to do minimal damage to the Country (Thus Hitler's attack on the Jews, Stalins attack against "anti-Resolutest" and Kulaks, The various Southern Politicians who always stirred up their white populations against the blacks and in the case of McCarthy Communists). The fear to work has to be against someone who has a possibility (in the mind of the people) to get control of the Government, i.e. NOT small tiny groups, but sizable groups, at least in the mind of the people (Thus Hitler and the Jews, the South and the blacks, Stalin and the Kulaks and "Anti-Revolutionists" and McCarthy and the Communists). The fact that none of these groups really had a chance to take over the Government is unimportant, it is the FEAR that they could is what the Dictatorship counts on.
Orwell saw this in Stalin's Soviet Union AND Hitler's Germany. Orwell did NOT want to get tied up with the details of those two dictatorships for both used different tactics to produce the fear, but it was the fear that was important to both. Thus Orwell's "Big Brother" and his "Animal Farm" to show how FEAR can be used to get people to do the opposite of what they should be doing and how people will agree to great oppression do to fear, fear produced by the Government so it can stay in power.
My point is Orwell is NOT any new ideas to Bush II, Orwell says such a ruler will use whatever means to produce fear and with that fear gather more power to produce even more fear. McCarthy is just the start (And I can go back to Mark Hanna, the GOP head of the 1890s onward to say he did the same thing, called the Democratic Candidate dangerous, insane, incompetent for the Democratic Candidate dare talked about CONTROLS over business to help the common man). This attack on any progressive ideas or politician continued throughout the 20th Century, but even the GOP thought it had died by 1940. The Problem McCarthy revived it and given the expansion of Soviet power in he post WWII era he had an enemy people thought was real. In the 1930s the New Deal had shown Government intervention in the Economy worked, thus the fear of domestic Communists were not longer effective, but with the expansion of the Soviet Union's power after WWII made the communists a new menace that could be used to produce fear.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(554 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
