Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grassley questions Obama's attorney general pick. Hatch supports Holder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 11:43 AM
Original message
Grassley questions Obama's attorney general pick. Hatch supports Holder
Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley said Wednesday that President-elect Barack Obama's selection of Eric Holder as attorney general threatens his new administration with its first controversy.

Grassley also said that New York Sen. Hillary Clinton is qualified to be secretary of state, but that her ex-president husband's work since leaving the White House could create problems for her confirmation

"I believe it's going to be much more controversial than a new administration ought to try to put forth," said Grassley, R-Ia., a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Grassley said Holder's role in advising Clinton on his pardon of Marc Rich, as the president prepared to leave office in 2001, could reflect negatively on the nominee during the committee's confirmation hearings.

"I have vague memories of some of his actions being very, very controversial," Grassley said.

Holder said at the time he was "neutral, leaning toward favorable" on pardoning Rich, a wealthy commodities dealer who had been wanted on charges of tax violations.

The pardon, issued on Clinton's final day in office, sparked controversy in part because Rich's former wife, Denise Rich, had been a major contributor to Clinton's presidential library.

Grassley said he recalled Holder's reputation and skill as a lawyer and federal prosecutor being sterling.

"So, I don't want to knock his credentials, and I tend to have deference to a president on who they might want to appoint," Grassley said.

"But if he's done some things that were strictly political, like in the case of Rich, it might question the judgment he uses, and in turn question the judgment of Obama," Grassley continued.

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20081120/NEWS09/811200361/-1/BUSINESS04

Then there is Orrin Hatch

Hatch on Holder: 'I Intend to Support Him'

"I think Eric Holder has a reputation and an experience factor that is very much in his favor. I respect the man, and I intend to support him," Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) told reporters in the Capitol.

Hatch called the Rich pardon "one of the embarassments of the Clinton administration's aftermath." But, he added, "the president had an absolute right to do that."

"I'm not going to hold that against ," Hatch said.

http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2008/11/hatch-on-holder-i-intend-to-support-him.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. "...skill as a lawyer...sterling." Yup, ask the Chiquita Internat'l execs who paid $1.7 million
to rightwing death squads in Colombia to murder some four thousand union leaders and workers over a seven year period. Holder is a protector of corporate crime--even mass murder. He got them off with a hand-slap (and secrecy--both arranged by the Bushwhacks in cahoots with Holder).

This is a bad, bad, bad, BAD appointment! It couldn't send a worse signal to Latin America, that we don't give a shit about the lives or rights of poor workers. MONEY RULES! The corpo/fascists remain in charge. That may be a given--I am not naive about that. But does Obama have to be so obvious about it? Of all the attorneys in this country--advocates of the rule of law, fighters for human rights, for consumers, for the environment, attorneys with a conscience, including U.S. Attorneys who fought Gonzo/Rove and got fired--he couldn't find someone better than Chiquita's death squad attorney for chief law enforcement officer of the U.S.?!

Not to mention his other ill actions, like the Marc Rich pardon. That's the least of it. You better believe that this is controversial. And I hope that Holder's worst action--Chiquita execs' immunity for mass murder--gets fully exposed, and Holder withdraws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Leahy disagrees
Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) says forget about the Marc Rich thing, Eric Holder's just fine.

In fact more than fine, Leahy says, he's as good as legendary Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, who served as a Nazi war crimes prosecutor and AG under FDR.

We need an Attorney General, as Attorney General Robert H. Jackson said 68 years ago about the federal prosecutor, “who serves the law and not factional purposes, and who approaches his task with humility.” That is the kind of prosecutor Eric Holder always was and the kind of Attorney General he would be.

He is a public servant who has had broad support on both sides of the aisle. I was pleased to see that the initial reactions of Senator Hatch, Senator Sessions, Senator Coburn, and many others were to acknowledge his public service, integrity and good qualities. Mr. Holder should have the support of Senators from both sides of the aisle if the President-Elect chooses to nominate him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC