A question of LOGIC for the rightwingnuts

[LynnTheDem]

911 happened under bush's "watch". He was warned...and he went on one of the longest holidays by a US president.

bush has not secured our ports or borders.

The US military keeps warning our troops are spread dangerously thin.

Those are FACTS, kids.

Terrorism has INCREASED under bush's "watch" and especially because of bush's invasion of Iraq.

That's a FACT, kids.
And bush's own thinktanks and bush's own State Department say so themselves.

Iraq is a total FUBAR.

That, too, is a FACT.
bush's own thinktanks say so; Tony the bLiar's own thinktanks say so.

97% of Iraqis, in the latest polls, a poll bush's own CPA ordered, view us as OCCUPIERS and want us gone. NOT "liberators", but OCCUPIERS.

Yes there IS a difference.

Afghanistan, the Forgotten War, is meanwhile falling apart, the Taleban are back, the warlords control all that the Taleban don't, and bush's handpicked "president" Karzai says he wants the Taleban back in government positions.

bush's and bLiar's own thinktanks warn that both Iraq and Afghanistan are fast becoming failed states.

Also meanwhile, bushCartel keep upping the terra alerts and warning we're NOT safer.

All FACTS.

So, logical question for you;

WHY WOULD ANYONE POSSIBLY THINK BUSH IS GOOD ON NATIONAL SECURITY???

It really just isn't LOGICAL, is it.

[cheshire]

1. Well first of all to many words, to big of words but seriously they are

not being rational about it but they are sure terrorist have a list and they are #1 on it.

[EmperorHasNoClothes]

2. Wait a minute...

You said "rightwingnuts" and "logic" but not "complete and utter lack of". Remember, to them facts are subjective and are only "true" if they support the wingnut position.

[nadinbrzezinski]

3. Hmmm

Maybe if I post this at the AOL board I can have one of the fanatics answer it... I guarantee that he will find a way to destroy your logic.

If nothign else he will call you a communist, a marxist and a fascist in the same sentience.

In other words, when it comes to fanatics following bush, don't try logic, won't work. I have tried it, and trust me... it just gets down ot name calling fast.. why they don't want them stinking facts... tehy are too intellectual I think.

:-)

[Crunchy Frog]

4. Yes but...

he just looked so manly standing on that rubble with the firefighter. I mean, you don't find that kind of leadership just anywhere.

And it was so wonderful when that statue came down. Surely anyone can see that such a fantastic moment was worth $200,000,000,000 and 1000+ dead soldiers. You libs just don't understand.:silly:

<heavy sarcasm>

[MsUnderstood]

5. To understand their logic

You need to watch the repulican convention.

It was amazing to watch the NY Governor get up and blame Clinton for not doing enough during his 8 years in office and stating the 1st Twin Towers attack, the USS Cole attack were responsible for the 9/11 action.

Meanwhile, Us democrats and thinking "Wasn't Bush president right after the Cole attack and didn't he TOTALLY IGNORE TERROR even after that event? Didn't Bush sit on his ass during a crucial time of 9/11?"

It is so hard to argue the lies.

[jab105]

6. ACCOUNTABILITY...

scream it from the rooftops!!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x789798