Why is Hilary being considered for SoS again? Just wondering
Hmm, wasn't Hilary hammered during the primaries for her lack of real foreign policy experience. Granted my knowledge on this is only through the media :) I'm just wondering what's changed since then which would make her better than Richardson? Perhaps SoS does much more or something else?
Oh and i do recall the whole "obliterate" comment by Hilary. I understood the context but such a word would seriously hinder negotiations with me.
She should not be Secretary of Health and Human Services. She is too close to the corporate, for profit, health care industry to do the right thing in that job.
4. Actually i really do want to know the reasoning for the choice...
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 05:54 PM by quantass
Im not trying to be anti-Clinton. Im just as surprised as the media about the choice and am looking for reasons for the selection. If you're like me and dont know I'd appreciate you saying so and not proclaiming me anti-Clinton.
Personally Secretary of Health seemed a better fit but again my knowledge is lacking and waiting to be filled in by a knowledgable DUer.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.