You say probable voters, I say likely voters, you say registered voters...

[Clinton Crusader]

Let's call the whole thing off.

This micro analysis is getting absolutely mind boggling! What category could they possibly come up with next?

POSSIBLE voters
MAYBE voters
APPARENT voters
CREDIBLE voters
ODDS-On voters
PLAUSIBLE voters
PRESUMED voters
NOT UNLIKELY voters
NOT IMPOSSIBLE voters
PERTINENT voters
LOGICAL voters

Geez Louise!
:kick:

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

1. I don't know how a subjective term such as "likely"

could ever work itself into a so-called scientific process such as polling.

[Kierkegaard]

2. Any category

that finds Borscht leading in some way or another, anything that will tamp down the enthusiasm of the mainstream to remove the cancer from the White House. Liberal media. BAH!

[Gin]

3. My personal belief is the undecideds won't make the difference....

the "new" voters will make the difference...and they need to be polled if we can do it.

If a person had voted in the past and is still undecided after all the information we have have been bombarded with...the heck with their opinion. I want to know what the first timers are thinking.

(IMHO)

[NoPasaran]

4. I agree

It's the people who haven't voted before, or quit voting at some point, who will be our margin of victory. It warms my heart everytime I sign someone up who says "I gotta vote this time". I've heard that a lot this summer.