Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF is going on in Alaska

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:04 PM
Original message
WTF is going on in Alaska
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 02:07 PM by ...of J.Temperance
With the Senate race between Ted Stevens and Mark Begich?

The polls I saw pre-election and post-guilty on seven counts of fraud, all of these polls had Mark Begich with pretty good leads....now we have this strange situation going on in Alaska.

Generally, the national and statewide polls the day before the election were rather accurate, give or take 2-3%....so are we to believe that ONLY the Alaska Senate race polls were totally out of sync?

Dunno, to me, the Alaska Senate race seems like somethings rotten in Denmark.

Other thoughts:

Minnesota Senate race....a week ago I predicted that Al Franken would unseat Norm Coleman, Coleman's "lead" is now down to 200 and some votes....with some 6,000 votes left to recount, I hold to my prediction that Al Franken will win this.

Georgia Senate race....December 2nd run-off, I believe that Jim Martin CAN unseat Saxby Chambliss, BUT in order to do this, Martin needs a huge turnout in places such as Atlanta....this race will be simply about who has the better GOTV campaign on December 2nd.

IF Jim Martin unseats Chambliss and Al Franken unseats Coleman, this gives us 60 Senate seats....the problem then is, will we have 59 Senate seats still because of Holy Joe.

If Holy Joe remains in the Democratic Caucus this gives us 60 Senate seats, if he leaves, it gives us 59 Senate seats.

Holy Joe will be in for a nasty shock if he joins the Republican Caucus, the GOP ONLY like him because he's FANATICALLY pro-Iraq War and FANATICALLY pro-Israel at ALL costs.

The Republican Party is now basically the party of Extreme Right-Wing Fundies, anti-Choice, anti-gays, anti-stem cell research, pro-Social Security privatization, pro-Dominionist Theocracy etc.

Holy Joe is pro-Choice, pro-gay rights, pro-stem cell research, not sure where he is on Social Security privatization....I think he's anti-Dominionist Theocracy.

So it appears that Holy Joe is fucked, the Democrats REALLY don't want him, but the Republicans REALLY don't want him either.

It's a pity that Connecticut doesn't have a Democratic Governor, if they did, then President Obama could make Holy Joe Ambassador to Outer Borneo or something, and then a Democratic Governor of Connecticut could replace Holy Joe by appointing an actual 100% Democrat to that Senate seat.

Sadly Connecticut is stuck with the GOP woman Governor Jodi Rell *sigh*

Sorry if I've rambled, I just had a few thoughts I wanted to go public with.


On Edit: Dammit spelling error

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. STOLEN ELECTION IN ALASKA?
http://shannynmoore.wordpress.com/2008/11/06/stolen-election-in-alaska/

Something stinks. Not just an ordinary low tide smell. Not like something you’d blame on the dog. It smells like an infection. For me to plug my nose, I’d have to overlook some curious facts.

In Alaska, more people voted for George W. Bush in 2004 than for Sarah Palin on Tuesday despite an identical 61-36 margin of victory. Yes. Only four years ago 54,304 Alaskans got off their sofas and voted for Bush, but decided to sit home and not vote for Palin in 2008. In turn, I have to ignore the 30,520 Alaskans who felt progressive enough in 2004 to vote for John Kerry, but weren’t inspired to vote for Barack Obama. I would have to glance past the 1,700% increase in the Democratic caucus in February, the 20,991 newly registered voters, and the three largest political rallies in Alaska’s history. I would also have to forget the people I stood in a long line with to early vote. It would be helpful not to know every other presidential election since Alaska began keeping records has had a larger turn out than the one we just had with our own Governor on the ticket. Try not to remember 12.4% more Alaskans showed up for the August primary as compared to four years ago, before the Palin nomination. Don’t think about the Lower 49’s record voter turn out this year either. Try to delete the memory file, though difficult, that 80% of us approved of Sarah Palin just two months ago.

Something stinks. You don’t care? Obama won. Yes. He. Did! Free at Last! Wait. Democracy demands all of the votes be counted…if you can find them.


more at above link..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Theory:
They needed Stevens to "win", he's going to be convicted and sent to jail, which means he can't serve in the Senate.

Palin is Governor, she gets to appoint someone to replace Stevens....she appoints herself, this keeps her in national politics until 2012, as opposed to reducing her to regional politics as Governor of Alaska.

McNut made a gaffe a few weeks ago, or WAS it a gaffe, when he called her "Senator Palin", instead of calling her "Governor Palin"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Don't think she can appoint herself -
she'll have to give Todd the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That'd work for them too
Todd Palin as Senator would keep her in national politics until 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Alaska's law on senatorial succession was changed twice in 2004
-- once by the Legislature, and once by ballot initiative. Both laws call for a special election within 60 to 90 days of the vacancy. But they disagree on whether the governor appoints an interim senator in the meantime.

The Alaska Supreme Court would ultimately have to decide which law the state follows.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. And the Alaska Supreme Court is
Republican dominated I suppose?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. They recently...
rejected an effort to stop the "Troopergate" investigation, maybe they're not exactly "big fans" of hers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well then, one can hope n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. No, they're not.
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 03:45 PM by Blue_In_AK
I've known the Chief Justice since 1977, and she's a wonderful progressive person. She ascended to her Superior Court judgeship after having been the state's chief Public Defender for several years, and it took her no time to make it to the Supreme Court, being highly recommended by the state's attorneys. She has an excellent mind.

I haven't kept up that much with the other members of the 5-person court, but they've made some good rulings in the past few years -- as in assuring same-sex benefits for state employees, etc., and continuing to uphold the 1975 Ravin decision which legalizes the possession of small amounts of marijuana here.

I have confidence in our Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. The gov does not appt anymore. There is a special election.
The law was changed after Murkowski (sp?) appointed is daughter to the Senate after he left it to become Gvoernor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. If this comes to a special election
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 03:07 PM by ...of J.Temperance
Then hopefully Mark Begich will win, the DNC and President Obama's people, in the event of a special election, need to FLOOD Alaska with poll watchers AND lawyers.

I should add that I think the reason we prevented Pennsylvania and Virginia from attempted theft, was because the DNC and the Obama/Biden people had so many poll watchers and lawyers in those two states making sure NO hanky-panky occured.

On Edit: Added comment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I would hope they will be very vigilant, as they should be during the GA runoff..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Absolutely, agreed on Georgia too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. The most she could appoint herself for
would be 90 days. We have to have a special election within 90 days of a vacancy. The governor could appointe an interim replacement, but to do that, she would have to step down as governor. That seems to be a risky step to take, since she's not particularly popular with the Republican Party establishment here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, if Martin and Franken win, doesn't that give the Dems 59, not 60?
Assuming Stevens wins in Alaska, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. D'oh, you are right
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 02:17 PM by ...of J.Temperance
I just looked at my notes from last week, and I had assumed that Mark Begich would win that Alaska Senate seat, well, lets face it, Begich did probably win....the Alaska GOP probably threw a bunch of Democratic votes out and gave them to the Mooses to eat.

So minus Holy Joe it'd be 58 Senate seats....Jaysus if ONLY we could convince Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe that they are not wanted in the Extreme Right-Wing Republican Party, convince them that Republicans in New England are going the way of the Dodo, and get them to Caucus with our side.

On Edit: Added comment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Alternatively, Obama could appoint either Collins or Snowe to his cabinet...
or Arlen Spector in PA. Then, the Democratic governor replaces the outgoing senator with a Dem -- poof, 60!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. These would be smart moves
I say go for it....although I loathe Spector, he's not a Moderate Republican like Collins and Snowe are, he just pretends to be Moderate, Spector never saw a piece of W legislation that he didn't like, he also comes across as a TOTAL ass-licker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yes, but Begich could still pull it off in Alaska.
If we win all three of the remaining Senate races, we reach 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Granted, though I'd put both AK and GA as very unlikely at this point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. GA is more optimistic than AK I think
But as I mentioned in OP, Georgia is going to be about who has the better GOTV campaign, if Jim Martin's people can get a huge turnout in Atlanta, he could unseat Chambliss on December 2nd.

It'd be very satisfying to remove Chambliss, his disgusting campaign against Senator Max Clelland proved him a pig....Clelland, a man who left two legs and an arm in Vietnam, smeared by a Chickenhawk Chickenshit like Chambliss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. A lot of it is GOTV, but...
I think a runoff between these two candidates is a far better deal for Chambliss than Martin. First, Chambliss got more votes in the Nov. 4 election anyway. Now, remove the Libertarian candidate (who garnered 127,000 votes in Georgia), and Chambliss looks even better. It will be extremely difficult for Martin to pull this off, though I don't dismiss it as impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. You could be right
But I hold out hope for Jim Martin :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Alaska is a freaking frontier outpost
Its time for Federal oversight up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well this is a historic day: A DLC'er actually admits to the existence of election fraud!
The motivation in Alaska is obvious: This is all about Moosealini. Stevens has to "win" so the senate can throw him out, Palin can appoint herself "temporarily" to the seat, and then run in the special election, which will also be stolen.

Ensuring not only another corrupt Senator from Alaska - and one less Democrat in the Senate - but also the continuation of the right wing's love affair with Tundra Barbie, whose functionally illiterate soundbites from the Senate floor will become a staple of the corporate media news. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. NO, I've always said that 2000 Presidential Election was stolen
I've always said that Vice-President Gore won and that Florida was stolen....and that something weird happened in Ohio during the 2004 Presidential election.

Yes I'm DLC, but I'm NOBODY'S rubberstamp....I'm an independent thinker, and if I think somethings wrong, then I'll say so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AkFemDem Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm not surprised. Stevens has been good to the state
he is a pork-master, and Alaskans have benefitted nicely from that pork. Alaskans don't want "change" because financially, the same ole same ole benefits us.

Honestly most people I know never believed the national polls about Begich. It's too bad, he's a good guy- but we all figured Stevens was going to win. There is a reason the crooked old man is elected time after time after time after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Utterly astonishing
From a state that elected Tony Knowles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. I think I disagree with you, FemDem
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 03:53 PM by Blue_In_AK
Did you see the map on the back page of the Daily News this morning that shows where Begich is ahead and where Stevens is? If I recall correctly, conventional wisdom has always been that Stevens did well because of largesse to the Bush, but all the rural areas are solidly blue. The red areas are the Valley and the Kenai Peninsula (not surprising) and Anchorage -- which to me IS surprising.

Plus the very low number of votes seems extremely suspicious to me. And why would McCain/Palin pull fewer votes than Bush/Cheney did in 2004? Could it be that some of those McCain/Palin supporters also voted for Begich and so disappeared down the rabbit hole? It's not out of the question because Mark took great pains not to badmouth Sarah during the campaign.

With so many undeclared and nonaffiliated voters here, I'm sure there were lots of split ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC