Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Make no mista'ke: the people who are attacking Rahm are pissed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:26 AM
Original message
Make no mista'ke: the people who are attacking Rahm are pissed
because they thought they could goad Obama into picking as his right hand a simpering weakling who they could roll at will.

This has nothing to do with any "concern" that Emanuel is too "partisan" or "represents politics as usual.". They're upset that Obama's Chief of Staff is one of the most experienced people in Washington, who knows where the bodies are buried, won't take any crap off of any of them - and, perhaps most important, will protect his boss from them with everything he has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:27 AM
Original message
Rahm was the perfect choice.
Every night I watch the news confirms this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
42. No doubt about it. Obama proves, once again, he intends to kick butt ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
45. Absolutely. He needs to have a strong start, and quick victories to get things going.
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 12:15 PM by SharonAnn
Rahm is a perfect choice.

I'd certainly prefer him to be more liberal, but then he'll be taking direction from Obama. And I'd like Obama to be more liberal, but he'll do fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. ditto and ditto~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. Ah, that magical thinking again!
Obama is not a liberal (true) and he picks a butt-kicking DLC-er for the second top job at the WH, but you expect the end result to be even vaguely liberal?

Funny how soon DUers forget the lesson of 2006 and the dashed hopes of Pelosi and Conyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #63
70. And yet Bill Clinton continues to be the object of hero-worship around here
despite the fact that he wasn't a liberal either and his picture should be next to 'DLC' in a dictionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
62. Not a perfect choice if you are
a Iraqi, or a Palestinian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. he has the perfect tempermant for the job despite what an
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 10:28 AM by jonnyblitz
arrogant and insufferable PRICK he is and his RW pro-war stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. James Baker was a prick too but well suited
as a successful COS. My opinion of Baker, who I couldn't stand, was
that he was very good at his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Actually, his "arrogant and insufferable prick" -iness is what amkes him PERFECT
for the job.

That's why even though I dislike the man, I grudgingly really support the choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. I completely agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codjh9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. ... which of course is why I'm GLAD he chose Rahm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Agreed
You just watch; They're gonna be playing Good Cop Bad Cop.

Barack can still claim to be a (relatively) nice guy and Rahm can take the heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
64. Of course the whole point of
good cop / bad cop is to make sure the subject goes soft and the cops get what they want. That may be cool in cop movies, but not so cool when the subject is the citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. "He's from the Lombardi wing of the party -- he's a guy who wants to win at any cost ...
... and will do whatever it takes."

-- John Lapp, quoted by Politico, about his former boss, Rep. Rahm Emanuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. When they start bitching, just put your fingers in your ears and
sing "La, la, la, la, la, I can't hear you." Who did the 'pukes think he was going to pick? Roy Blunt?:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveable liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Harry Reid!!!! Ahhh haaahahahahahaaaaa :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. They'd have feigned outrage over any pick, honestly.
Get ready for the bashing of every cabinet appointment, unless there's a (R) after their name.

Even then, they'll still do some bashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
77. The (R) part doesn't matter at all...
it's the Obama part that causes all the disturbance. It's getting old already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. They just knew he was going to pick a wimp like Dashcle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnrepentantUnitarian Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. Just look at the message this sends...
A Jew and a "Muslim" working so closely together!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. Those where my exact same thoughts
them throwing temper tantrum, knowing they can't run rings with Obama.
This message needs to get out there pronto, we are in the driving seat '
now, show the MSM who is in charge now.

Change their talking point from creating division as opposed to solving.

How I so want the corporate media crash and burn.

With employment skyrocketing and the economy in the tank, all they can talk
about is COS Rahm being a bad pick. Obama need to put a stop to this now before
it gets out of hand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. The screaming from the right wing is PROOF that Obama made the right choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Bingo! We should be worried if they had been happy. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorentz Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Um... The screaming is on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Um... it's also from right wingers like Boehner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. that's why it's so brilliant. If the right and left are irritated by it,
then it appears to be a centrist pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. if the right wing is crying - we made the right choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. I think Rahm is perfect for this position, currently. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. Rahm was a signal that no one was going to fuck with an Obama administration.
If Congress thought he would be weak, they are now sorely disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Haole Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. Obama proved with McCain he can't be bullied
I'm pleased with his choices so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. Have I told you lately that I love you, EffieBlack? You rock. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
19. Once again, Obama actually shows how f#$king smart he is and "some" people seem shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
73. Yeah, "some" people,
like anti-war people. But go on with you smearing innuendo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #73
79. I'm talking about the pissed off Republicans bitching about Rahm's appointment.
The Republicans don't like Rahm because they know he gets shit done. They would have rather had Obama pick someone else and they attacked Obama immediately.

Silly me - I'm thinking of the Republicans working against Obama, not Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
20. No, I was definitely upset because Rahm represents politics as usual.
I've since come to believe that he will be very competent as Obama's Chief of Staff, though, and I'll probably be happier with him out of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. Exactly.
I was thinking the same thing. Emanuel could be a real stinker
in Congress, but as a point man for getting things done, he
could be good.

You know.. make your enemy your friend and keep him close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. I love the Emanuel choice, and...he's very handsome IMO....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
65. Handsome, right. Now tell that
to the Iraqis and the Palestinians, and to every anti-war person on the planet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. Nothing is perfect. This choice is not black or white, but a shade of gray.
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 11:13 AM by BlueEyedSon
Rahm is powerful, professional and can play the game.

Is he progressive enough, uncompromised enough? Not for my tastes. But I can live with it.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
72. "Live with it"?
So what happened to holding Obama's feet to the fire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. Admit it! Rahm is DLC.
That's why people are pissed. He supports all of the DLC and NDN positions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. I'll admit it. Still a good pick.
The Chief of Staff answers to the President and executes the President's agenda. Not the other way around. Rahm has an iron will, is deeply loyal, and executes the plan with conviction.

Obama needs a pit bull, Rahm is a great pick as a pit bull. The fact that he's DLC is secondary, IMO.

Most Dems need to learn how to fight and fight hard. The DLC maybe be a bunch of old politics and right-wing views on many issues, especially financially, but one thing they do well is fight fight fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. Where does the Chief of Staff vote?
Do you think he is going to send laws to Capitol Hill that Obama doesn't know about?

Why does this matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. So what?
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 12:05 PM by Bleachers7
That's no secret. But it's also no secret that Obama is in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. Well, I see your point.
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 12:02 PM by loudsue
And it's a good point. ;)

edited for missing letters....oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
82. Do his positions on issues matter much in this job?
He has to carry out Obama's directions, whether he agrees with the policy or not, is the idea I am getting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
25. I watched the Brookings Institute's take on it on C-SPAN
I got the impression that they think Rahm is the perfect person for the role. :) (Assuming he's matured since the dead fish incident :rofl:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
30. He's the bad cop, so Obama can be the good cop
I think it is brilliant! Now, I want HIllary for Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipfilter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. Good Cop, Bad Cop
analogy is perfect. The guy on top can be the good guy while his wing man can roll the heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDwho Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
33. I stick by President Obama's decision. He knows what he's doing,
Obviously, the rethugs are threatened, because they know Rahm won't take any crap. Obama is brilliant to hire a bulldog as his COS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
34. The dreamer part of me is very unhappy. The realist part of me sees this as a perfect pick.
Yeah .... I'm sitting on the fence. I'm straddling a picket. If I slip, that picket will shove itself ...... uh ....... you get the idea.

President Obama will be well served by a guy who is not just able, but happy, to kick ass and bust heads.

If you have an agenda, then you need ruthless efficiency to achieve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
35. Exhibit A: Chicago; Exhibit B: "I don't do cowering"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fired Up Democrat Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
37. rahm is a no non sense kinda guy
I heard hannity last night actually sound scared of rahm. no joke. this guy is the perfect guy to help set obama's agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
38. Emanuel knows how to find a bipatisan consensus
This guy is tough, but he is also very intelligent and insightful. I saw an interview of him on CSPAN and he has a grasp on the issues, the motivations from each side for supporting it and how to find a compromise to get it passed. This guy knows what the hell he is doing and how to get shit done.

The only reason the republicans are whining is because they want divided partisan battles. The worst thing in the world for them is a strong competent demonstration that can work with both sides, because it will undermine all their power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #38
69. I've seen "ipartisan consensus"
more or less every day since the 2006 elections. You want to see more of the same in foreign policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
39. Is he strong enough to stand up to the DLC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
43. Also I think people that are pissed on the Democrat side...
are pissed because they didn't want any-one from the Clinton era back into the White House. So I wonder how many more ex-Clinton people Obama will pick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geekgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
44. I think Rahm was a GREAT choice! It means he means BUSINESS and that's what we just
hired him to do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. Rahm means BUSINESS alright....
BIG BUSINESS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #53
71. Yeah. Isn't it funny
how people cheer him beause he's a butt-kicker, without considering it's their own butts he's gonna kick? And the butts of people they would like to see protected instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rdublue Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
47. Emanuel is a brilliant pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
49. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer...
I think Obama has neutered the asshole by making him chief of staff. He can no longer be some kind of loose cannon in the House.

He will HAVE to support and implement Obama's decisions, whether he agrees with them or not. He no longer has ANY power.

Rahm Emanuel is toast. He can never hinder Obama now.

Brilliant!

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. My thoughts too...kind of...
I think what you say is part of the situation, but I also think he's a great choice for the job. His personality may be a problem in congress, but it's perfect for COS. I think Obama may have found a better fit for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. He is competent enough, that's for sure.
But having him in the West Wing means that he cannot make any waves in the House. I really think that's the point. We'll see.

His hesitation in accepting this post is also quite interesting. I think he has WAY too much ambition to accept his excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
50. I'm sick of the GOP wanting to pick our administation!
They are already whining about wanting Republicans on Obama's team--otherwise he isn't fulfilling his promises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
51. So Rahm is going to "protect" Obama from progressives???
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
54. heheh. don't you love it tho, the squealing from the right
about 'o, boo, look! Obama is not reaching across the aisle because he's not picking someone lameass backstabber We would suggest'.

bunch of clowns.
I don't know all that much about Emmanuel, in fact what little I know of him is not good because of his connections to the DLC, etc., but I can say this:

If Obama thinks he is right for the job, then that's the way it is. I have every confidence that Barack is chosing people that he knows will fit the best - his campaign staff already has proven that. He does not do anything without being thoughtful about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimWis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
55. Me thinks you are right on. Good post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
57. Obama will be well-served by Emanuel as COS.
Emanuel's ideology is irrelevant since he will not be crafting policy. I can't think of anyone better suited to execute Obama's directives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
58. They're going to yell and scream and throw tantrums
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 02:16 PM by Sugarcoated
as the Democratic party changes and asserts itself. Being a kind and fair party doesn't mean it has to be passive and dumb. They can be nice and smart . . . just like our new President.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
59. A great choice
Rahm has sharp elbows and will tell it like it is. I'm a leftwing liberal but I know that if the govt was filled with folks with my mindset, we would be drummed out of Congress in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lumpsum Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
60. The fact that the pick of Rahm is pissing off the repukes so bad is good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
61. The Wingnuts are such hypocrites! First they try to paint Barack as being anti-Israel
to scare Jews into voting for McCain. Now that Rahm is going to be his COS, Rush is all about how picking a Jew is gonna piss off the Arab world.

Go take another hundred oxy-cotins and STFU, Rush!

Rahm's father is Israeli, and was part of the pre-1948 Zionist underground (before the "Z" word was so reviled) and Rahm himself worked in Israel during the first gulf war. I know he and Barack are actually good friends, and Rahm has the right personality to scare people into submission. But I bet a lot of the reason for this pick was to get some cred with Israel and American Jews.

As far as I'm concerned, neither Rahm's politics nor his modern conservative Judaism sit well with me (I'm much more to the left, and although ethnically Jewish, an agnostic) but if those traits help out the new administration, more power to them all!

That said: I'm sorry, I think Rahm is hot! I saw him once on The Daily Show and watched the whole interview wondering how I could become the kosher filling inbetween those 2 slices of Jewish Rye!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
66. Though my candidate turned President elect has picked an enemy of everything
I stand for and support and believe in, I will withhold judgement and watch how things play out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
67. Don't forget with the pick of Rham
All roads Republican take have to go through Rham to get to Obama...if they want to show their ass...well....guess they will get the shitty room in the basement and then get the lights turned off. Just sayin..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
68. What does Chief of Staff do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
74. And the cries come from the party that gave new meaning to the term "partisanship".
Cry me a river. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mid_FL_voter Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
75. Do I care what they are saying?
Heck, no.

Rahm is the right man for Obama's Chief of Staff.
Period.
The end.
Whiners can keep on whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
76. Message from Rahm: "Fuck you. We're gonna be fucking successful and the circular firing squad ends"
He also went on to say, "Tell those fucking assholes I'm not losing shit. I took out Hastert. We took back the House. And I'm gonna ram all our hopes and wishes down those fucking Republicans throats until it comes out of their assholes."

He went on to rip the door off its hinges, slam it over the reporters head, and then calmly place it back in its place before screaming, "I serve the fucking king of the world!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
78. Here to admit my ignorance.
From what I've seen of Rahm Emmanuel (and I admit it's very little) - he strikes me as decisive. But I know next to nothing about him. Can someone give me one or two strong links to improve my education? COS is one of the most vital appointments in any administration, and I'd sure like to be able to speak from knowledge!

Thanks, fellow DU'ers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
80. Which People Are You Talking About?
Edited on Sat Nov-08-08 11:42 AM by Crisco
Right wingers? Who cares?

At DU, most who are upset over this choice are pissed because they know Rahm has fucked over progressive and populist Democrats. For example, when he convinced Republican businessman Tim Mahoney to flip blue and run for congress in Florida, when there was already a good Democratic candidate.

I don't mind seeing Rahm give up his congressional seat to another Dem, actually. Might be better for scandal-proofing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
81. It's like Deniro and Pesci.....
... if you'll forgive me for making light of what is, in all reality, a very serious matter.

I said to myself on Tuesday night at the AMAZING closing scene of that awesome Obama movie we've been watching for the past 21 months that I couldn't wait for the sequel and hoped it was just as good. I have yet to be dissapointed.

Every great movie has a cool, calm and collected guy in charge who's backed up by a secondary figure, often five feet of human being but 8 feet of man. A man who is content existing in the shadows while the head guy take the limelight. A man who would rip the heart out of anyone who crossed them and then dump their body in the desert, never to be heard from again. And it gets even better ... ours, (bless him) is missing part of a finger. Lost in a meat cutting incident.

And just when you think you've figured the man out, like he's walked right out of central casting. Wait! He's a flippin' ballet dancer!!!

Yep, this Obama sequel is gonna be even better than the original.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC