Rasmussen NC Obama +2 (50 -48), Indiana McCain +3 (49-46) , Montana McCain +4 (50-46)

[jezebel]

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/

[Occam Bandage]

1. I can live with that. Let's hope we close strong and blow them away.

[slinkerwink]

2. Was Montana a battleground state or a historically red state?

[jezebel]

3. Ruby red. nt

[Sodan]

5. Clinton won MT in 92

[jezebel]

11. That was only due to Perot. nt

[WI_DEM]

4. All recent NC polls have O up, and early voting has been strong

I think O can do it! Indiana will be extremely close and I can see it going late into the night like it did during the primary. Two other Indiana polls out today have O up by 1 and dead even in the other. Montana can still go blue!

[FVZA_Colonel]

8. Last Ras NC poll was McCain +1.

This is good to see, however close it might be.

[knowledgeispwr]

10. I really think Obama will win NC.

His campaign has a good ground game and there has been high early voting turnout, which capitalizes on these polls.

[MarjorieG]

6. Does anyone think this redistribution junk is sticking? (McBush redistributes up, surrogates)

[Zynx]

7. No. These are all shifts in our favor.

[knowledgeispwr]

9. These polls suggest the opposite.

Obama is moving up in these polls.

[Schulzz]

12. No surprise in my opinion.

All 3 states will be close and our chances are best in NC, because of heavy early voting. Obama is sightly ahead there in every poll.
IN could be won on the ground (near Chicago) and MT will be close, but I'm not counting on both states.
The big story of this election is that all those red states are in play. They went for Bush by double-digits in 2004. You can tell who is winning by this fact alone...