Two good reasons to not be concerned about Diebold machines in PA:

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

scheming daemons

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Oct-28-08 10:15 AM
Original message

Two good reasons to not be concerned about Diebold machines in PA:

2006 Senate race:

Casey 59%
Santorum 41%

2006 Governor race:

Rendell 60%
Swann 39%

I'm pretty sure that Diebold's CEO would've wanted Santorum to win that seat. ;-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.