Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Name that gate: Pipelinegate? Transcanadagate? Bidgate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
whitewomenforobama Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 03:18 PM
Original message
Name that gate: Pipelinegate? Transcanadagate? Bidgate?
Link: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.palin26oct26,0,3488403.story

Gov. Sarah Palin's signature accomplishment - a contract to build a 1,715-mile pipeline to bring natural gas from Alaska to the Lower 48 - emerged from a flawed bidding process that narrowed the field to a company with ties to her administration, an Associated Press investigation shows...

Despite Palin's boast of a smart and fair bidding process, the AP found that her team crafted terms that favored a few independent pipeline companies and ultimately benefited the winner, TransCanada Corp.

And, contrary to the publicity, there's no guarantee that the pipeline will ever be built; at a minimum, any project is years away, as TransCanada must first overcome major financial and regulatory hurdles.

In interviews and a review of records, the AP found that:

• Instead of creating a process that would attract many potential builders, Palin slanted the terms away from an important group: the global energy giants that own the rights to the gas.

• Despite promises and legal guidance not to speak directly with potential bidders, Palin had meetings or phone conversations with nearly every major candidate, including TransCanada.

• The leader of Palin's pipeline team had been a partner at a lobbying firm, where she worked on behalf of a TransCanada subsidiary.

• Under a different set of rules four years earlier, TransCanada had offered to build the pipeline without a state subsidy; under Palin, the company could receive a maximum $500 million.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's dump this -gate shit & start ending scandals in "Dome" after Teapot Dome.
Pipeline Dome maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oh, but I love the "gate" so much
It reminds everybody of Watergate and no matter how trivial the matter might be, just saying something-gate in reference to a politician creates a bad perspective for them in the minds of voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Liargate
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC