Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Huge Ethics Scandal That's Being Ignored

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 04:22 PM
Original message
The Huge Ethics Scandal That's Being Ignored
Edited on Sat Oct-25-08 04:23 PM by babylonsister
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015367.php

THE HUGE ETHICS SCANDAL ON THE BACKBURNER.... It's vaguely surreal that in the midst of a competitive presidential campaign, one of the candidates for national office is embroiled in a major ethics scandal, and the political world is largely ignoring it.

Two weeks ago, an independent investigation launched by the Alaskan legislature into Sarah Palin's abuse-of-power scandal wrapped up on Friday with a fairly devastating report -- Palin violated the public trust, violated state ethics laws, and lied about it. Soon after, Palin, driven either out of ignorance or illiteracy, said the report had cleared her of "any hint of any kind of unethical activity," which is the opposite of reality.

The investigation into Palin's scandal is not yet over.

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin finished giving three hours of depositions Friday night to the state Personnel Board, which is looking into whether she unfairly fired Alaska's public safety director this summer, her attorney told CNN.

Palin, the Republican vice presidential candidate, gave her deposition in St. Louis.... Her husband, Todd Palin, also was supposed to testify separately Friday but it was unclear if he had done so.

Personnel Board investigator Timothy Petumenos took the governor's testimony.


Now, the Petumenos probe should be more favorable to Palin. It's run, after all, by Alaska's personnel board, which is made up of members who answer to the governor, which makes it far from independent. My suspicion is that Republicans support this inquiry because they want one more report -- in this case, a less objective one -- to clear Palin of any wrongdoing. The new talking point would be, "One investigation cleared Palin, one didn't, so let's just forget the whole thing."

This may yet be tricky, however. Petumenos is a Democrat who contributed to Palin's 2006 opponent for governor, Tony Knowles. Complicating matters slightly, the Anchorage Daily News reported that the personnel board's investigation of Palin has been "broadened" to include "other ethics complaints against the governor."

But stepping back, it's amazing this scandal is barely generating a whisper in political circles. A candidate for national office has been found to have violated ethics laws, recently, in a major abuse-of-power scandal. The Obama campaign isn't pressing the issue, reporters seem to find this irrelevant, and most voters probably have no idea that the scandal is ongoing. As far as I can tell, John McCain hasn't said a word about any of this, and reporters haven't even asked for his perspective on his running mate's

It's odd. If Joe Biden were recently found to have abused the powers of his office and lied about it, and was still under investigation as Election Day neared, I have a hunch it'd be a bigger deal.

—Steve Benen 1:55 PM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perplexing isn't it?
The only thing I can think of is that American's, particularly repugs, are so used to their politicians being embroiled in ethics scandals, they think it's a prerequisite for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Its not that average Americans are ignoring this
Its that the MSM wont tell them about it.

Sure they spent 5 minutes talking about it on the day she was found to have violated ethics law in Alaska, but 3 of those 5 minutes were spent on excusing her behavior by the MSM just so they could claim it wasnt newsworthy to continue reporting on it after that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There is also a rather obvious media blackout
of Palin's well-documented ties to the AIP.

Gotta love that "liberal media"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly! The M$M is steadfastly ignoring this 800 lb. gorilla in the middle of the campaign
Just as it was with so many of these issues with her, and with McAnus...if the shoe were on the DEMOCRATIC foot, there would be 24/7, non-stop shrieking on the part of the Reich-wing-nut-whore-media. If it were Obama's teenage daughter who was pregnant, and her African-American boyfriend had posted on HIS MySpace page what Levi Johnston had posted, he'd be a gang-banging thug and Obama's parenting skills would have been dissected six ways from Sunday. If Jill Biden had been involved in some radical secessionist party, it'd be all over. If Biden had addressed that convention, it'd be all over. If Obama were in with Ayers as deep as McAnus is in with G. Gordon Liddy, he never would have made it past the primaries.
Double talk, double standards...fear, lies and smear tactics. It's all the rePigliCons have; it's all they've ever had; it's all they ever WILL have, and I hope it's the reason they go down in flaming defeat, never to rise again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree with what you say.
but I don't get your sig image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Is it not showing up OK? It's Failin' Palin with NOPE on it...meaning
no fuckin' way should anyone vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You are probably right, but that doesn't explain the m$m's
lack of attention (except Maddow and Olbermann).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sewsojm Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Could it be that the rules don't apply to republiCons?
You Betcha!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC