Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

**DU just doesn't get it:** SNL appearance a WIN/WIN for McCain campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:41 AM
Original message
**DU just doesn't get it:** SNL appearance a WIN/WIN for McCain campaign
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 03:44 AM by Bippity Boo
I am amazed by the media savvylessness of the reactions to Palin's SNL appearance on this board. PALIN REQUESTED TO BE ON THE SHOW. Her campaign would not have done this if they saw it as a potentially dangerous situation. And it wasn't. It was a win/win situation.

If SNL had viciously attacked Palin (which was unlikely given their history of treating walk-on celebrities with kid gloves), they would have played the "poor victim Sarah" card, and used the appearance to prove that the "Eastern Media Elites" are out to get her.

The narrative of this appearance was: Brave Sarah walking into the Den of the Media Elites that ridiculed her and showing she doesn't give a damn what they say about her. If she had reacted with anger, she would have lost, but she smiled and winked and got out precisely the message that her campaign wanted. Did anyone else notice that the entire opening skit took place OFF STAGE, where the audience could not boo her, protecting her from the only possible unpredictable element in this little farce. For god's sake, she had McCain donor Lorne Michaels practically holding her hand, protecting her through the entire opening sketch.

On every news program for at least the next 24 hours they will be playing those clips and celebrating what a good sport Palin was and how she played it cool. This was a media coup for them. SNL has been played by the McCain campaign and anyone who thinks this made Palin look bad is deluding themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is certain to cost us the election.... ( n/t )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not making any claims that the election is lost.
This is not the end of the world, but anyone who sees the SNL appearance as a stinging rebuke to Sarah Palin has never seen a Friar's Club Roast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. DON RICKLES FOR PRESIDENT !
Er ... I mean ... Joey Bishop ....

Or how about : Courtney Love ?

Cmon ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sidney J Mussburger Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
56. I knew it
an unfunny performance on any stage with retarded female Christ reborn, will cost us the election. It happens everytime. Not. It's a weird senerio though.

One of these days we'll figure out how to stop these Fascist members of the opposing party to represent 'Real Americans'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. I am very concerned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That poor puppy...
Awwwwww, come here little guy, it's ok, you didn't do anything wrong....yes, that's it...good dog!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Me too, very very concerned (cute puppy pic)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
43. It's not my fault. I just learned to eat solid food a week ago. WTF do I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
79. Is this your dog VolcanoJen?
I love it, its so adorable. That face!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
88. I'm just drowning in concern here.
Fucking trolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is this SNL appearance changes people's minds in spite of this country's predicament....
We're screwed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just another distraction, the last few days it was Joe Plumber...what's next?
Meantime, 100,000 folks at Obama rally, 75,000 in a different city later the same day, these go unreported.

what will it be next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I mean, really
Good gawd. It's infuriating, isn't it? Palin's SNL Stunt was just another Epic Fail from The Shittiest Campaign Of All Time. And yet there are those here who would invent some kind of imaginary backlash.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. the Obama rallies were unreported, this Palin appearance will be toast of the news
that is not an "epic fail" for their political campaign. that is McCain controlling the media message and taking the heat off of his campaign, taking the spotlight away from Obama. this is not good for us.

Again, I am not playing Chicken Little here. I don't know the precise effect this will have, obviously. But it is not some sort of rebel blow to the face of Palin's media image. It plays into the McCain camp's game plan, which is why they put her on there in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Who needs some kind of "rebel blow" to the face of her media image?
Please. Her image is a fail. If there's one real person you could point to, one real event, that is driving McCain's numbers south, it's Sarah Palin. And this SNL stunt doesn't help her one damned bit.

If anything, the media will replay "The Palin Rap" over and over again. You actually think that helps her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Two words: "Rappin' Ronnie."
Rappin' Ronnie didn't hurt Ronald Reagan's image. They call these people "teflon" for a reason. The bigger an amoral psychopath you are the less you care what the media says about you and the harder you are to satirize with any really damaging effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. With all due respect, you're nuts.
Sarah Palin isn't "teflon." She's awful. Her approval ratings plummet with each new poll. You have no factual basis with which to claim that somehow, an epic backlash from her "treatment" in the SNL appearance to which she volunteered will somehow hurt Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. There will be no backlash.
She simply went there and looked good in front of a camera, which has been her job ever since she was a beauty contestant and TV sports announcer. Mission accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. So you're conceding the point you tried to make in your OP?
What a weird, weird thing to be worried about.

You should be troubled by McCain/Palin's increasing negativity. The whipping-up of the base. The charges of Anti-Americanism.

But some stupid appearance on SNL? Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
80. That is bs. I watched CNN a lot yesterday and his rally was mentioned 3 times at least.
This "his rally was not mentioned" is not real. They reported it on CNN on the Battlegrounds show with John King. I hate the MSM as much as anyone but to say no media reported on the rally is a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
98. What's next is "That $150M sure looks funny to me"
The inference will be that he received money from all kinds of unsavory sources. One particular unsavory contributor will be found (I have no idea who -- this is just the tactic), and this contributor's name will be shouted from the rooftops.

Obama needs to keep playing high-road politics, and making appearances in battleground states in front of huge crowds. He also needs to advertise them to death. However, our "down-ticket talkers" (up to, and including Joe Biden) need to more forthrightly discuss:

AIP -- Why doesn't Sarah Failin' love America?
Charles Keating- How can McSame, a man partly responsible for the last huge banking crisis in America, possibly be expected to fix this one?
David Ifshin - Oh my goodness, John McSame has been pals with some people who didn't like America much either, hasn't he?
One House/One Spouse -- Wasn't it Bob Dole who said "character counts"? Let's discuss Mr. McSame's character: his 1st marriage ending, his gaming, his temperment

...there's more, but you get the picture. Bottom line -- we need to put them back on defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooRaLoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, please.
She looked like a very embarrassed cardboard cutout. I think she's also embarrassed a lot of her voters. Not that it will change their vote, but the "base" will be disappointed by this.

This was no media coup.

Add to that, it's a matter of perception and personal opinion. I think people "get" their own impressions of Palin's appearance just fine. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. To be clear, I find her completely repellent and uncharismatic...
Yet if the media can champion her debate performance as doing a good job, they will be championing this as well. Her handlers know how to play the expectations game. People tune in looking to see Palin get mocked by SNL, and get this lightweight puff pastry, so she comes out looking tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooRaLoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I don't think it will have that effect, though.
People will think she looked like she gave in. And then she just sat there while she got made fun of.

Most voters will not be informed enough to realize she wanted to be there. Even if they do know, it was a very awkward, lame appearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Except that her handlers don't know shit.
I mean, c'mon now. Sarah Palin has been an Epic Fail since the day after her speech at the RNC. It's been fail after fail after fail. It's been entertaining to watch. But I get a little irritated when someone pops up on DU telling us "we don't 'get it'"

We get it totally. We're laughing. And we really don't feel like a bunch of predictable whining from the Palin Camp is going to buy John McCain six points in the polls or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Sorry, but you don't get it
You get the HUMOR (as all of us do), but most people will come away with the impression that Sarah Palin has a great sense of humor about herself, and that makes her more likeable.

That is never good for the opposing candidate. And yes, people really are that fucking shallow....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. With all due respect, that's just plain nutty.
Nobody gives a crap about Sarah Palin's f'n feelings. It shows in every poll. Her approval ratings have plummeted. This will be seen by most people as a silly stunt and any kind of whining about something to which a candidate volunteered will be met with a massive yawn by the American people.

I'm getting bored with the hand-wringers, I really am. There's plenty to be concerned about as we head to the polls, but this isn't one of those things. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #34
82. Seriously.
It has gone to pathetic to worse. But that's pretty darned good, in a few people's opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. WHO CARES???...the Game is OVER....McLame is TOAST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Obama has repeatedly said this can still be lost
There is massive GOP vote supression going on. I can't see how anyone can claim this election is won. The right wing is playing every dirty trick at their disposal. THEY BUILT THE VOTING MACHINES, for chrissakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
50. Unfortunately, you're right...
I don't think anyone can look at the polls today vis-a-vis where they were last Tuesday and conclude that "it's over and we've won."

Yes, I think it was reasonable to expect a tightening of the race before Election Day. I don't think it was reasonable to expect it to come immediately after a debate where the consensus opinion was that "Obama won" and quite easily. I was actually expecting his poll lead to increase a bit in the wake of the debate, and only start narrowing during the final week or two. Instead, we've had a major tightening of the race at the very time Obama's lead should have been increasing...and for no discernable cause.

It's not over because such narrowing in tracking polls will likely start manifesting itself in upcoming swing-state polling as well. Currently, Obama has several paths to victory given the apparently solid lead he has in the Kerry states plus NM/IA; he has only to win one of a number of swing states (Colorado, Ohio, Missouri, Virginia, North Carolina, or Florida). However, in some of those, his current lead is narrow enough that a tightening of the national polls will likely flip them to McCain (it's almost certain to happen in North Carolina, Ohio, and Missouri). That leaves Virginia, Florida, and Colorado -- two out of the three of them with Republicans supervising the vote and a history of voter suppression.

Don't get me wrong -- at the moment, at least, we still have a lead beyond the margin of error. But the Obama campaign is very worried about complacency, and (it would appear) for good reason. We really can't afford to get in another 2000/2004 situation, where the only way to win lies through a state where the deck is stacked against us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
100. It ain't over until the votes are counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. Finally, somebody gets it!
The polls began tightening when McSame was at the charity dinner, showing what a "wonderful" guy with a "great sense of humor" he is. It blotted out the image of him with his tongue hanging out at the end of the 3rd debate.

This SNL appearance will make the average idiot--I mean, "independent"--voter think Sarah's got a wonderful sense of humor about herself. And, being as shallow as people are, this will help the McCain campaign.

Don't think so? Remember how Bill Clinton's appearance playing sax on Arsenio Hall's show won people over?

People here need to listen to Obama's own words, and quit being so cocky. This election will be a fight to the finish, and anyone who thinks otherwise is fooling themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooRaLoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Two things -
1. Clinton playing a sax, very well, I might add, does not in any way compare to Palin sitting there getting laughed at in a place where she seemed very uncomfortable.

2. Noting her awkward "performance" is not akin at all to being cocky that an Obama win is eminent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. Oh ye of little faith. Obama has countered every lame, transparent attempt by mclame to overcome
him with transcendent bad-assery. This is NOTHING. No Obama voter is going to be swayed by a SNL appearance. The "American Public" will have forgotten all about this by the time the election rolls around. I want the media to fawn all over Mcsaggypaleballs for a bit. Right before the election they will be annoyed, swing the other way and start tearing into them so as to make up for lost time. That's how they roll. They've got to keep the suspense up so they can sell magazines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. It's not "Obama voters" we're worried about
It's SWING voters. The idiots who are too stupid to side in with one candidate or another, they're the ones who decide elections.

And many of them are just shitheaded enough to think this SNL business is cute. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Exactly... elections are about images and illogical appeals to the unconscious as much as facts
So many voters are voting based on personality and emotion rather than facts. This is why the "person I'd like to have a beer with" factor is so prevalent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #26
36. Wake up. This is not a "Person I'd Like To Have A Beer With" election.
Are you paying any attention? Like, at all???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. every election is that
That is why the media have focussed so much on how angry McCain looks. When he looks angry, he looks unlikeable. It's not about facts, it's about image. His image is old and bitter and unlikable, so Obama has actually had a chance for a change with our shallow electorate, because he is younger and more handsome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. So you think Obama has a chance because he's younger and handsome?
Really????

You haven't been paying one bit of attention, have you? This particular election actually has been, to the surprise of most of us here at DU, about facts and ideas.

If you can't see that, then the only conclusion I can draw here is that you really suck at political punditry and Zeitgeists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. famous Jack Kennedy / Richard Nixon debate
Nixon lost because he looked old and sweaty and Kennedy looked young and appealing. That's the way it is. We are not living in a meritocracy, we are living in a high school level social environment where the cheerleaders like Palin are still on top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Oh gawd
You're pointing back to a debate that occurred FORTY EIGHT YEARS AGO as evidence to support your preposterous argument? Do you recognize that many of us (including me) were not even born when that moment occurred? Do you believe we are somehow frozen in our perceptions and that absolutely nothing has changed since Nineteen Freaking Sixty??

You're really not very good at this. I'm sure you're of good heart and you're on our side, but your handwringing over this SNL thing is just outrageous. Stop it. You don't know what you're talking about, and you keep proving it with each additional post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. i'm not telling you to shut up, so stop telling me
you disagree with me, i disagree with you. please stop presuming this means i automatically lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. Fair enough
Please continue defending your hypothesis. I have no problem with that whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #49
96. Hey, I disagree with you, too, Bippity.
Ms. Palin came across as shallow and plastic last night. But then, we knew that, didn't we?

Vote changer? No way.

Colin Powell will be the talk of the media for the next two days, not what's-her-name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #39
51. OK, you're definitely not talking like a Democrat.
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 04:54 AM by TexasObserver
If you're going to pretend to be someone you're not, you have to learn the things we would not say.

You just said one of them. You see, we loathe Grumpy because he's is IS angry, he IS unlikeable. Those are FACTS, not matters of image. And our attraction to Obama isn't shallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. you're not talking like a democrat, you're talking like a bully
I don't express myself as you would prefer, so I'm not a real democrat? So much for the "big tent" theory. You're being a paranoic, witch-hunting "narc" detector.

I want Obama to win with all of my hope. That does not mean that I do not see how hard it is for Democrats to win the Presidency in a society where plutocrats control every single media outlet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. WE capitalize Democrat, and you're talking like Sean Hannity.
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 04:48 AM by TexasObserver
You ain't foolin' anyone here except yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #55
58. you're talking like an Obama-hating conspiracy theorist
I guess the GOP don't have the monopoly on fear and scapegoating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #58
63. Whatever, Mr. Buchanan!
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 04:52 AM by TexasObserver
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #24
110. Swing voters?? Anyone who says they haven't made up their mind is
a lying sack of crap, in my not so humble opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
19. It was boring, lame, inconsequential, and, insofar as there was "content"....
it all was meant to portray her as a fool. So, lose-lose for McLoser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
83. well said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
22. I agree......
She didn't just go on there for shits and giggles, they have an agenda. I doubt this will make many people change their minds on who they are voting for but like I said she didn't go on there just for the hell of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
23. You amuse me
You are either the most frightened Democrat I've ever met or just very bad at..... being something else.

The media will do what they will do. If they will praise Palin for appearing on SNL, they would just as easily praised her for NOT appearing. They don't say things based on anything that actually happens, they make up the narrative to fit their argument. It doesn't MATTER what the candidates do, at least when it comes to what the media will say.

What matters is what gets through to the public, regardless of what the media says. Palin went on SNL, and looked lost. She looked like the butt of a joke, and most who saw it will remember it that way no matter what the media says happened.

If you are just trying to yank our chains here, well, you suck at it. If on the other hand you really believe the nonsense you spouted above then you have a metric assload to learn about politics, elections, and the media. Perhaps you would do well to become an expert on the subject material before calling other people delusional. I realize that everyone feels they have a right to their opinion, and I suppose in some sense they do, but having an opinion on things you know little about just makes you look extraordinarily foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. Come down off your high horse
I've been heavily into the election game since 1984, and I have seen where seemingly unimportant things have made drastic changes in polling AND election results.

This SNL appearance is a distraction from Obama's campaigning and from the issues. In other words, it's just what McSame's camp wants. It makes me sick that SNL even had that bitch on their show. Why not have Joe Biden on, and have him debate Tina Fey as Sarah Palin? It would've been a lot funnier, and we would've gotten the big-time publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooRaLoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. I think you're right about the distraction part.
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 04:21 AM by esuna
But the people who see clips on the news will probably still see her as either looking out of her element, or they will see her as a joke. I agree with you it will probably be used, but not to the effect that the McCain camp would like. Just like so many of their backfired ideas.
edit: typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #28
48. Dude, the OP is punking you
Don't you realize that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. if the system is as trustworthy as you suggest, why was Bush re-elected?
Fox News is the highest rated cable news network at the moment. We are not living in a fact-based society. That is the entire premise of The Colbert Report: the GOP exploits and maniuplates gut feeling over actual facts.

Jimmy Carter was a great man who spent his presidency being mocked and maligned. Ronald Regan was a malevolent poseur who was lauded as if he were a great man for most of his 8 years in office.

Elections are not about who has the facts on their side. Elections are in large part about about manipulation. The GOP has the upper hand in this regard because they mind lying to the American public less than Democrats do. The more you are willing to lie, the more you can manipulate the public, and the better you will do at politics. Ethics are a disadvantage in political life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #33
53. I don't recall saying the system was trustworthy
Don't be ridiculous. If anything, I was saying the system is LESS trustworthy than you seem to believe. So untrustworthy in fact that iit makes NO difference whatsoever what Palin does, they will attempt to sing its praises. That's why her appearance on SNL is largely irrelevant, because the media will praise her in any case. If it matters at all, it is only to the few undecideds who could be swayed by what she did there, and those few will remember what they SAW, not what the media says about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
40. Exactly. Perfect.
And you're right... in the end if this SNL stunt has any kind of effect, it will be that people will view her as a sorry butt of a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WallStreetNobody Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
27. Just saw it and thought she looked kind of foolish
I just saw both the sketches that included her and in the first one she had maybe 3 or 4 lines, and in the other one (the rap) she had like 1 line. In that cold open where she had only 3 or 4 lines they had Alec Baldwin (who in real life hates Palin big time) talking about how incompetent she is and then the "joke" just being that he realizes she is right there and then calls her hot. Big deal, she got pwned right to her face and didn't have any comeback. The bigger joke of all this is that she, the Republican vice-presidential candidate, has yet to hold a press conference and won't even go on Meet The Press (which all candidates before her except for Quayle have done) but she will do a late-night comedy show like SNL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooRaLoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. The uncomforatble part before the rap:
I actually thought she seemed very serious about backing out of doing the rap herself. I'm sure that's the way that segment was written, but it came off as such a somber thing when she said that her campaign thought that was a bad idea. As another poster said, she looked lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
30. Well, to me it just looked horribly awkward.
They seem to have been mocking her to her face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
37. Go on!! You're so full of fascinating observations.
Or ... something.


Anyone who thinks Palin's appearance on SNL moves the polls anywhere is delusional, the kind of delusion that only followers have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
45. if anything, she lost part of her base but maybe gained a few mindless swing voters, net effect of 0
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #45
60. you might be right there
most of the right wing racists she appeals to hate rap music, so i definitely concede that possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
47. Ok a VP that goes on a comedy show but refuses interviews and Sunday Morning Talk
I Call BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #47
57. That should tell you how threatening the McCain camp views SNL: not at all.
They allowed her to go on a show, but they do everything to avoid placing her in any situations beyond their control. SNL was a cakewalk for them. Lorne Michaels is a McCain donor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #47
59. Tomorrow, they'll have a silly segment about her in news, but then a serious segment, too.
All the serious newspeople will lament that she has time to go on SNL, but can't answer simple questions in interviews, like every nominee for president or vice president has.

She'll get some chuckles from the more vacuous news talkers, but the more serious pundits will pan her for her continuing cowardice in refusing to face the media.

The net impact will be that it will diminish Palin's already fallen stock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
61. If they're banking on a solid performance on SNL to take them over the top three weeks from

the ballot box, they are beyond desperately fucked.

The only way they can win is to steal it and that
is what they are attempting to do.

Get the polls as close as possible so the theft can't
be detected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
62. If Colin Powell actually endorses tomorrow, that will be the =BIG= news the next few days...
And I'm pretty certain that before this thing is all over, our guy will also be on SNL and he will ROOoOOOOOck!!!

~~~~~~~~~~~ I love you President Obama ~~~~~~~~~~~



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. The economy is big. The endorsement of Powell is big. Palin is a footnote.
Palin no longer matters to anyone except the GOP base.

She's turned off Democrats and independents.

The SNL show will not move anyone, except Rich Lowry, and he's pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
64. Believe me it's all over we are only working for how much we will win this election now. >
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 04:56 AM by barack the house
Not even being over confident just on absorbing the data. McCain even knows it that is why the dinner had his concession speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
66. I agree that the self-deprecation - "lightens up" her image and makes her
look like a good sport, not the ignorant, nutter and vile smear master that she really is. It was certainly more positive for her than negative; by far. Much like Barack Obama seen laughing at jokes about himself at the Al Smith dinner.

However, I doubt very much that it will have any real effect on the election one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
67. Final thoughts, to clear some things up...
My intention was not to declare this a decisive moment in the campaign or to claim that Palin is charismatic. My intention was to draw attention to the fact that I believe that SNL allowed itself to be used by the McCain campaign, and they got out of it what they were hoping for. Palin was treated gently, there was no effective blows directed at her, only lightweight material about Eskimos and beauty pageants. My main reason for posting was a feeling that those who felt that Palin was humiliated by her appearance on SNL are misreading the situation. No insult towards those of that opinion intended.

Gotta get some sleep now. Thanks for discussing this with me, for the most part civilly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crappyjazz Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #67
71. I can see the point you are trying to make
but I disagree ...

I don't think this will have a lasting effect either way, especially with Colin Powell coming up this morning, SNL will be forgotten.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
68. The joker and the clown: Ready to Lead?! Pfft.
Didn't watch - hope to get in line early enough to see Obama today and watching tweedle dum-dum on SNL was just soooo not worth staying up late for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
69. It is not any sort of "win" for the Republicans. Your analysis is shit
They got to sling all the Palin stereotypes right to her face, and she had to suck it up, smile, and nod along with it. If you were expecting SNL to do some sort of vicious broadside Punk'd sort of thing with her there, then I marvel at your serious lack of intelligence. Above all, SNL is an entertainment show. It isn't news, it isn't even the Daily Show.

This is by far the dumbest thread in the DU today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
70. Actually her appearance was so bland
that the media is hardly giving it a second look this morning. There was not really anything newsworthy that happened. It was actually boring. No one will even be talking about it tomorrow. SNL played it perfectly. She will not get any traction out of her appearance. There is no big story. It did not do anything to promote or improve the McCain/Palin ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sodan Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
72. It was boring. Just boring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
73. Don't mean dog-do, but I feel your palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
74. yeah, but she wasn't that good.
Not a rehabilitating perfomrance, and I would say the SNL writers made sure of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
75. Pretend Barack went on the show and....
..... someone sang a country song "for him" in which the lyrics made reference to him being a Muslim and pallin' around with terrorists.

That's essentially what Palin did last night.

See, not so positive huh?

But *I* enjoyed it! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
76. she just sat there, said a couple of lines
what kind of appearance is that?

if they put glasses/wig on a crash test dummy, sat it in the chair - you wouldn't know the difference

it didn't garner any more support than she already had, just reinforced the paliniac devotion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
77. i'm voting for palin fuck mccain win win win win win you said it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bcoylepa Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
78. it was beyond creepy
and she was clueless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
81. Oh yeah....how'd it turn out for the moose?
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
84. not much of a win. standing/sitting there and being insulted was about all she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
85. "On every news program for at least the next 24 hours..."
They will be talking about POWELL ENDORSING OBAMA AND OBAMA'S 150,000,000 HAUL IN SEPT.

:rofl:

PWND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
86. She followed the script
and all the jokes went so far over her head her eyebrows never moved.
She has been exposed as the new role model for bobble head dolls the world over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
87. Colin Powell endorsed Obama ---- next.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
89. I watched Faux this morning to see their take .... "she didn't blow her lines"
'She was good fun'



They wouldn't show it except 12 seconds of it, promising they would show it later.
If it was soooooooooo good like you say! Don't you think they would have played it
over and over and over again? They never came back and played it like they promised
the whole morning segment.

Talk about being Delusional

Faux News is the John McCain campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
90. i think you're wrong but if Powell did not endorse this morning you would have been correct.
Rock, Paper, Scissors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
91. They appeared to be fairly hostile towards her...
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 10:01 AM by casus belli
and they didn't really hold back when throwing punches her way. If you had listened to the rap, it was pretty biting. She was going along with it, but you could tell she wasn't particularly comfortable. I thought Baldwin's "How could you put Tina out there with that woman when she goes against everything we stand for, Lorne" was awesome. It was one of those not-really-joking jokes that apparently went way over her head.

I wish they had laid it on a litte thicker. She deserves every uncomfortable moment she gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
92. It will help her with her post-election career as a TV talking head. So that's a "win" for her
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NEDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
93. Thank you for your concern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
94. it didn't help her or the McCain camp at all
Who cares if she's a good sport, willing to stand by with a smile while SNL makes fun of her lack of qualifications. Much of America (including many in the media) had already reached the conclusion that Tina Fey's and SNL's critique of her was right on target. The fact that she can suffer through it with good humor does nothing for her.

You are right about one thing--she handled the situation as well as she could have. It would have done her no good to get angry. But the appearance didn't help her at all. Nor did it help her campaign. In short: the bulk of the country is laughing *at* her, not with her.

"For god's sake, she had McCain donor Lorne Michaels practically holding her hand, protecting her through the entire opening sketch."

Michaels donated to McCain in the primary, well over a year ago. He donated to Obama--the maximum, in fact--when it was clear Obama would be the Democratic nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
95. Not after this morning it isn't. The media coverage is now all about Colin Powell.
Palin's lame SNL appearance is forgotten already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
97. Silly Sarah was punked
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
99. all media attention that she gets is lose/lose for Mccain. That's what we get.
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 10:16 AM by Essene
all she did was VALIDATE the attention SNL has put on her patheticness.


and they made fun of her behind her back while she wsa there, for anybody really paying close attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheZug Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
101. You may be right, but Powell's endorsement just canceled it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #101
106. I'm not afraid to admit when I'm wrong, and am GLAD I was wrong.
As I've made clear from the start, I'm praying for Obama to win. My trust of the American electorate is not exactly firm based upon the outcome of the Presidential elections in my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
102. Bippity Boo, we're voices in the wilderness. Our hatred of Sarah Palin is preventing
some of us from seeing how successful her performance on SNL was.

Now, I don't believe for a minute that it's going to help McCain/Palin politically ... not after a couple of days of pundits patting her on the back, anyway. The economy is still in the toilet -- no SNL appearance can change that.

But it won't hurt her, either. I am not concerned that this will make any difference in the election. I just know that I saw a politico demonstrate her own media savvy last night on SNL. I howled -- watching her put her hands in the air, with those button-down clothes and that B-52 bun ... comedy gold! And she knew it, too.

I hate the woman and everything she stands for. She's a liar and a hypocrite, but she also knows how to go on a comedy show and demostrate she's willing to laugh at herself -- embrace the cast's mockery of her. She earned her pop-culture cred last night.

Bippity Boo, I tried to float all this last night; about 2 percent of DU agreed with me. So, I'm giving it up. Time to put the Sarah Rap behind us and GOTV!!! GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarthaMyDear Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
103. Kind of a hostile title for a thread! Coming on DU forum...
...and telling everyone they just don't get it.

Glad to know there are geniuses like you to set us straight! Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bippity Boo Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #103
104. if i hadn't named the thread that, no one would have read it; it would have dropped like a stone.
hyperbole is sometimes necessary to get a point across
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
105. Bullshit. It won't make one bit of difference. The base still loves her and no one else does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
107. Well, THIS is certainly concernful....
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 10:57 AM by cliffordu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
108. Palin is a minus.
It doesn't matter whether she was good on the program or not good on the program. She's bad for democracy, she's a flirtatious dolt, and she has roughly 2 more weeks before voters toss her into History's big dumpster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
109. All you need to know: Palin said she wouldn't talk to the press and they did a...
...spoof on her in the News segment while she acted like she could dance while they made fun of her.

It was pretty meaningless overall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
111. She was merely set dressing. What, exactly did she do but look uncomfortable
and read a few lines? :shrug: If this changed any minds, they were leaning toward McCain anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
112. I haven't watched SNL in more than 20 years and I'm sure I'm not alone.
Most people don't give a flying fuck about that show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
113. No, the media spotlight will be on Colin Powell n/t
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 10:56 AM by intaglio
edit for word order
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
114. Its only a WIN on November 4 - I'll bookmark this til then
I disagree.

You have no clue what you are talking about.
If the media plays her clips from last night and spins them as BRAVE SARAH - SHE BETTER SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH HER "POOR SARAH" BULLSHIT WHINING about the media.

FUCK sarah failin (and i don't mean literally)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC