Didn't Rush Limbaugh say that McCain was going to...

[DemzRock]

intentionally throw the election sometime during the primaries? I think he said that McCain was going to pay the GOP back for what Bush did to him in 2000.

I doubt it, but do you think it's possible? Was Rush on to something?

[unpossibles]

1. who cares?

I don't think this is the case, I think that was Rush covering for his masters' inevitable fall.

[yellowcanine]

2. It is hard to see what he would do differently if he WERE throwing it.

But of course he may just be that incompetent. That is the more parsimonious explanation.

[billyoc]

3. An Obama presidency will be worth millions to that fat junkie, unfortunately.

[Wapsie B]

4. I think it's entirely plausible.

The Bush's really did a number on McCain in '00. I honestly thought he was going to get the nomination back then. That is until South Carolina. Then it became clear the gop handlers had other ideas.

[kskiska]

5. He also said that Michelle Obama was pregnant.

[onenote]

6. Rush was on something, not on to something.

[FloridaGrl]

7. The only thing McCain threw away

was his credibility. This hate filled campaign is not throwing an election, it's a sign of desperation.

[TrogL]

8. I hate to say it, but Rush is partially right

They're throwing the election because there's nothing left to loot.

[Kookaburra]

9. But why would they want to chance prosecution?

Don't you think they realize that with democrats in control there are going to be prosecutions? Why wouldn't they want to just hand everything over?

[TlalocW]

10. Rush is never "on to something"

He's often "on something."

TlalocW

[MetaTrope]

11. The only thing Rush is on is some preteen Dominican boy