Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Did Not Ask to Delay Security Agreement, Iraqi FM Says - CNN Ticker

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 01:22 PM
Original message
Obama Did Not Ask to Delay Security Agreement, Iraqi FM Says - CNN Ticker
<snip>

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) – Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama did not urge Iraqi officials to delay a decision on a security agreement with the United States, Iraq's foreign minister told CNN on Sunday.

The statement by Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari refutes a recent published report and a statement by Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin that Obama tried to influence Iraqi politicians negotiating with the United States to score political points.

Obama "never, ever discouraged us not to sign the agreement," Zebari said. "I think this was misrepresented, and I have clarified this case in a number of interviews back in the United States recently."


The Washington Times reported Friday that in June, Obama told Iraqi leaders in Baghdad that an agreement between the United States and the leaders to allow U.S. troops to stay in the country after 2008 should not go into effect unless it had congressional approval.

The newspaper quoted Samir Sumaidaie, the Iraqi ambassador to the United States, about a June 16 telephone conversation between Zebari and Obama.

But the article did not contain a comment from Zebari.

The campaign of Obama's Republican rival, Sen. John McCain, argued that Obama's call interfered with U.S. efforts to reach a "status of forces agreement" with the Iraqi government. The United States and Iraq have yet to announce an agreement despite numerous reports that one was near.

During a Friday fund-raiser in Madeira, Ohio, Palin said Obama tried to influence the negotiations "in a way that would set back America's cause there, while advancing his campaign here."

<snip>

Link: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/12/obama-did-not-ask-to-delay-security-agreement-iraqi-fm-says/

Yet another RW talking point knocked down!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll eagerly await a retraction from the Moonie Times and Sludge...
Right-o.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Since we know that Palin doesn't read anything or
really have a curiosity about anything she should keep her mouth shut on International affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sodan Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wasn't it knocked down weeks ago?? Expect it to come up next week again :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clearly the Iraqis are in the tank for Obama
Everyone's in the tank for Obama. Heck, the majority of Americans are in the tank for him! How unfair is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morillon Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The whole world is in the tank for Obama. :-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morillon Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's projection on their part.
The right wing is just telling us what THEY would do, under the circumstances. After all, they've done this kind of thing before, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rec'd. Now for a retraction from the Propaganda Times
who printed this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC