The bleating sheep of the MSM are trying their best to cover the side show of McCain Palin's attacks while ignoring the economy. This effort to ignore the economy is not even handed, since the MSM also ignores counter-attacks launched by the Obama campaign based on the associations of McCain/Palin. The Keating 5 are largely ignored. Troopergate barely registered a mention on CNN.
Instead, we have article after article once again dwelling on Obama's race, and McCain's race-baiting. Or, the article simply repeats the latest smears about Obama being a radical or a terrorist, which are often just recitations of earlier smears. Hey, if they are going to re-hash old material, then lets give the Keating 5 its due, or does the media only replay false attacks? I am not sure it is helping McCain in the end, because it is so apparent that McCain-Palin are trying to distract from issues like the economy, but if this is the case, shouldn't the media ignore the distraction and try to get straight answers from McCain-Palin regarding what are their proposals for the economy?
Instead, we have the media rabidly attending McCain-Palin events hoping to catch a supporter yell out a racial epithet when McCain asks, "Who is Barack Obama?" Worse, such coverage only encourages the McCain-Palin camp to try to top the outrageousness of earlier attacks. Last week, McCain-Palin painted Obama as a terrorist. Now, McCain-Palin plan to portray Obama as a baby killer. Of course, the media will now earnestly await what answers are forthcoming when John McCain/Sarah Palin ask, "Who is Barack Obama?" They will then feign surprise as their followers shout the answers they have been fed by McCain-Palin's latest attack ads.
Of course, how is this relevant to the issues? How does this help address the most serious economic crisis since the Great Depression? It doesn't. McCain is not about Country First, its about John McCain first. Hopefully, at the end of this campaign, John McCain gets what he deserves, whish is to be mentioned in the same breadth as Joe McCarthy and Jesse Helms in terms of promoting smears and attacks based on associations, innuendos, and race.
Sample coverage:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/11/AR2008101102216.html?hpid=topnewshttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/opinion/12rich.html?hphttp://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/722568.htmlhttp://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1848755,00.html