Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT Fact-Checks McCrypt's Tirade Today and It's Not Pretty.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:53 PM
Original message
NYT Fact-Checks McCrypt's Tirade Today and It's Not Pretty.
Drilling Down on the Facts in McCain’s Speech
By Larry Rohter

Speaking in Albuquerque on Monday, Senator John McCain attacked Senator Barack Obama on several fronts that by now have become familiar. But many of his charges relating to the economic meltdown, taxation and health care contained inaccuracies or exaggerations of his own position or Mr. Obama’s.

For instance, Mr. McCain claimed that “as recently as September of last year,” Mr. Obama “said that subprime loans had been, quote ‘a good idea.’” But that quote is taken out of context and reverses the intent of Mr. Obama’s remarks, which were clearly meant primarily as a criticism of practices on Wall Street.

“Subprime lending started off as a good idea helping Americans buy homes who couldn’t previously afford to,” Mr. Obama said in a speech to NASDAQ in September 2007. But, he added, “as certain lenders and brokers began to see how much money could be made, they began to lower their standards. Some appraisers began inflating their estimates to get the deals done. Some borrowers started claiming income they didn’t have just to qualify for the loans, and some were engaging in irresponsible speculation. But many borrowers were tricked into glossing over the fine print.”

Mr. McCain also said that Mr. Obama “was silent on the regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and his Democratic allies in Congress opposed every effort to rein them in.” That oversimplifies a complicated situation that was the subject of partisan wrangling dating back to the 1990s, long before Mr. Obama arrived in the Senate in 2005.

From his remarks, it would appear that Mr. McCain is referring in part to the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act, which Democrats did oppose when it was introduced in 2005. But they did so vocally, not silently, because they saw the proposal as fundamentally flawed.

But Republicans controlled the Senate and its agenda then. That suggests that Mr. McCain’s Republican colleagues, some of whom opposed regulation of markets on purely philosophical grounds, had at least in part a hand in the bill’s failure to come to a final vote.

In addition, Mr. McCain exaggerates his own role in efforts to prevent abuses at the federally-chartered companies. “I was the one who called at the time for tighter restrictions on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that could have helped prevent this crisis from happening in the first place,” he said. In reality, Mr. McCain signed on to the 2005 bill in May 2006 and was not one of its original sponsors.

Mr. McCain also criticized Mr. Obama’s policies on taxes, in language similar to last month’s first debate, with a few new fillips. But fact-checking organizations have already repeatedly dismissed the bulk of the accusations he made as inaccurate or exaggerated.

<SNIP>

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/drilling-down-on-the-facts-in-mccains-speech/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cowardly Lyin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. drill baby drill! another dry hole for McCrypt... n/t
Edited on Mon Oct-06-08 10:04 PM by BREMPRO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I love how the media is fact checking him, and making him look like a fool.
I laughed when CNN fact checked Palin's lie about Obama and Ayers, and they said she was lying.

And then they fact checked the Keating Five scandal that Obama brought up, and gave it a thumbs up for truth!

It's not that the MSM saw the light, it's that the McCain campaign has treat them like shit and lashed out at them, so they're going to fuck up his campaign as much as possible. I'm never seen anything like it.

Finally, and I mean FINALLY, the MSM isn't letting the GOP nominee get away with lying--well not as much as in the past, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It IS comical. They start at ugly and go straight to over-the-top.
Working the refs is never a good idea either. It makes the Media Heathers cranky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Reality is in the tank for Obama!
Damn liberal reality bias! The media needs to go back to compensating for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Surely Palin will correct much of the misinformation she's been touting given she reads the Times?
Edited on Tue Oct-07-08 12:06 AM by mzmolly
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC