Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debate analysis (sentence structure, grade-level, etc.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 11:57 PM
Original message
Debate analysis (sentence structure, grade-level, etc.)
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/

...

The analysis noted that the "passive voice can be used to deflect responsibility; Biden used active voice when referring to Cheney and Bush; Palin countered with passive deflections."

"It obscures the doer of the action," said Language Monitor President Paul Payack, an independent with no political affiliation.

...

Grade level: Biden, 7.8; Palin, 9.5 (Newspapers are typically written to a sixth-grade reading level.)

Sentences per paragraph: statistically tied at 2.7 for Biden and 2.6 for Palin.

Letters per word: tied at 4.4.

Ease of reading: Biden, 66.7 (with 100 being the easiest to read or hear), versus 62.4 for Palin.

The analysis said Abraham Lincoln spoke at an 11th-grade level during his seven debates in 1858 against incumbent Stephen A. Douglas in their race for a Senate seat from Illinois.

But higher grade level doesn't necessarily mean better sentence, Payack said. He pointed to Palin's second-to-last sentence in the debate, which the formula put at a grade level of 18.3:

"What I would do, also, if that were ever to happen, though, is to continue the good work he is so committed to of putting government back on the side of the people and get rid of the greed and corruption on Wall Street and in Washington," Palin said.

"When she said it, it sounded good, but on paper it's a completely different animal," Payack said. "It's like, what is that?"

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. huh?????
I told someone today that Sara Palin is the queen of run-on sentences. I almost never heard a period in her sentences, they just ran on and on and on stringing unrelated comments all together.

This analsysis seens very strange to me...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. those automated grade analyzers give a higher score to convoluted sentences
because it takes more brain power to decipher them. That's in part why good media isn't writing at a grad school level - it needs to be clear and rapidly readable. So yeah, her sentences are a piece of work. The computer scoring can't analyze actual credibility or meaning, just relationships of phrases, sentence structure, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sarah at a higher grade level? Guess comprehension wasn't a factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. see my reply above - higher score isn't a good thing - it means more work to decipher. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Grade level" is a misnomer because it awards points for babbling. "Fog Index" is the correct term.

"What I would do, also, if that were ever to happen, though, is to continue the good work he is so committed to of putting government back on the side of the people and get rid of the greed and corruption on Wall Street and in Washington. "

FOG Index Calculator <http://www.panix.com/~dhf/fog.html>
Fog: 23.0553

Number of words: 47
Number of sentences: 1
Average words per sentence: 47.0000
Percentage of complex words: 10.64

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunning-Fog_Index>

In linguistics, the Gunning fog index is a test designed to measure the readability of a sample of English writing. The resulting number is an indication of the number of years of formal education that a person requires in order to easily understand the text on the first reading. That is, if a passage has a fog index of 12, it has the reading level of a U.S. high school senior. The test was developed by Robert Gunning, an American businessman, in 1952.<1>

The fog index is generally used by people who want their writing to be read easily by a large segment of the population. Texts that are designed for a wide audience generally require a fog index of less than 12.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Love it! you should send that to CNN. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-04-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. What a bunch of horseshit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC