Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin, Protector of Children vs. Her Record

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 02:22 PM
Original message
Palin, Protector of Children vs. Her Record

Republican vice presidential nominee Gov. Sarah Palin styles herself as a fierce protector of children and families, but her record on health insurance for children and pregnant women raises doubts about her priorities.

In her acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention, Palin had a special message for the parents of children with special needs: "I pledge to you that if we are elected, you will have a friend and advocate in the White House."

During last night's vice presidential debate, Palin promised to make special needs children one of her top three priorities, if she is elected. She also told the audience that she and her husband know what it's like to raise children without health insurance.

" in our marriage in our past where we didn't have health insurance and we know what other Americans are going through as they sit around the kitchen table and try to figure out how are they going to pay out-of-pocket for health care? We've been there also so that connection was important," Palin said.

Yet for all her folksy winks and jokes about hockey moms, Palin's record as governor suggests that she may not remember the bad old days as clearly as she claims.

As governor of Alaska, Palin could have restored health insurance to 1200 Alaskan children and 530 pregnant women for less than one million dollars at a time when her state had a $1.3 billion surplus. She did not do so.

Republican presidential nominee John McCain has a similar record of hostility towards government run health insurance for low income children. When Democrats proposed in 2007 to expand the State Child Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) to cover 10 million more children, McCain voted against the plan and praised President Bush for vetoing the bill.

By contrast, Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Joe Biden supported attempts to renew and expand insurance through SCHIP, the federal program that pays 70% of the cost of state-run child health insurance programs across the country.

SCHIP is credited with reducing the number of uninsured children in the United States by 2.7 million from its inception in 1997, despite rising unemployment and poverty levels.

In 2008, Palin had the opportunity to increase access to Alaska's SCHIP program, known as Denali KidCare, a program for families who make too much to qualify for Medicaid but cannot afford private insurance.

Gov. Palin has been in office for less than two years. Her track record on children's healthcare is short; however, her failure to act on child health insurance is very revealing. Despite significant public pressure, Palin declined to support the bill that would have extended medical coverage to an additional 1200 children and 530 pregnant women for a mere $875,000.

Palin claims to be an advocate for children with special needs. Poor children are at heightened risk of disability and chronic illness. So, any policy that pushes healthcare out of reach of low income families is a double whammy for those with special needs.

The fight over Denali KidCare is about how poor you have to be to qualify. The program originally covered children whose families made up to 200% of the federal poverty level.

Under Gov. Frank Murkowski, the threshold was cut back to 175% percent of the federal poverty level. Eligibility was frozen at the dollar figure that constituted 175% of the federal poverty line at the time the law was signed with no adjustments for subsequent inflation.

These changes, spearheaded by Republicans in the state legislature, took health insurance away from many lower middle class families.

By the time Palin took office, the effective cutoff was about 150% of the current federal poverty guideline. During her first year in office, the governor quietly signed a bill to unfreeze the eligibility threshold, which meant that the the maximum income in 2008 would be 175% of the federal poverty guideline for 2008, not 175% of what the poverty line was in 2003. In 2003 the federal poverty guideline was $23,000 for a family of four, which meant the family could earn up $40,250 and still qualify for benefits. Five years later, the FPG had risen to $26,500, but the maximum income was still $40,250, a mere 151% of the FPG.

Palin had little choice but sign the bill, because Alaska stood to lose SCHIP funding for the entire program if the threshold fell below 150% of the 2008 poverty line.

Children's healthcare advocates welcomed the measure as a small step forward. But even after unfreezing, Alaska's SCHIP rules are among the most restrictive in the nation.

In the second year of the Palin administration, State Sen. Betty Davis introduced S.B. 212, a bill to restore the original 200% threshold for Denali KidCare.

The bill had the support of a broad coalition of health and social services groups. Planned Parenthood, Catholic charities, faith based organizations, and the AARP found themselves on the same side of the Denali KidCare issue.

Two hundred people rallied in Anchorage in support of the bill, a massive turnout by local standards.

The bill passed the Senate and cleared all but the final committee in the House.

Palin had a golden opportunity to restore health insurance to 1200 Alaskans for less than a million dollars. All she had to do was pick up the phone and convey her support, or even her acquiescence to undecided state legislators.

The fence-sitters were looking to the governor for reassurance, according a Juneau lobbyist who pushed for the bill. (The lobbyist asked not to be named because of agreements with unrelated clients not to be quoted in the media.)

These legislators were under intense pressure from conservative Republicans and they wanted reassurance from Gov. Palin that she would sign the bill. Members didn't want to cash in political capital for a bill that the governor was going to veto anyway.

Palin failed to act and the bill died in committee. It is not clear why the governor opposed extending health insurance to poor children. Some observers speculated that Palin let the bill die because the program covers abortions.

The state of Alaska does not cover most medically necessary abortions. Therefore, Denali KidCare is an important source of funding for uninsured pregnant women seeking to terminate their pregnancies.

Before receiving the vice presidential nomination, Palin had promised to hold a special legislative session this fall to debate two abortion bills. Denali KidCare hoped to get their 200% solution on the agenda during the special session. With the governor off on the campaign trail, it is doubtful that a special session will be held any time soon.

Palin's attitude towards health insurance for poor children is in step with that of her running mate, Sen. John McCain.

When the SCHIP program was set expire in 2007, McCain voted against a Democratic-backed bill that would have reauthorized and expanded the SCHIP program.

At the time, McCain said he opposed the bill because he didn't want to raise the federal excise tax on cigarettes to pay for expanded coverage.

McCain is on the record as opposing expansion of SCHIP to cover middle class children, which he believes would be a departure from the program's original intent.

SCHIP is designed to help families who make too much to be covered by Medicaid, but not quite enough to buy their own health insurance. Because health insurance costs have increased much faster than incomes since the program started 1997, the target group is getting larger because more and more people are getting priced out of health insurance.

Democrats in Congress twice failed to achieve a veto-proof majority for the enlarged SCHIP plan. President Bush vetoed the bills, which would have extended health coverage to 10 million children. Congress eventually passed Bush's stopgap bill which funds the existing SCHIP program through March 2009.

It is interesting to note that McCain supports enhanced medical insurance for embryo-Americans but not for born children. The Arizona senator voted for a bill to extend SCHIP coverage to fetuses in utero. Obama and Biden voted against that bill.

Sarah Palin had the opportunity to expand health insurance to Alaskan children, but she chose not to. She and her running mate have signaled that they are hostile to any expansion of government-funded healthy insurance, even for uninsured children. For McCain/Palin, free market ideology trumps practical solutions.


http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/10/03/palin-protector-children-vs-her-record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r&b. Lots of great posts here today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC