Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TNR: Joe Biden--Inspired Veep Pick

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:50 PM
Original message
TNR: Joe Biden--Inspired Veep Pick
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 10:56 PM by nsd
Joe Biden--Inspired Veep Pick

No question Palin helped herself tonight, but that's only because she had so far to climb. If you're grading on anything other than a massive curve, Biden wins hands down.

The beauty of Biden is that he can go blow for blow with Palin on ordinary Joe-ness, then actually know what he's talking about when he answers questions. Palin talks about the mean streets of Wasilla, Biden talks about the mean streets of Scranton. Palin talks about her son in Iraq, Biden talks about his son in Iraq. Palin talks about being the mother of a child with special needs, Biden talks about being a widower with two badly injured boys. Every time you thought she might claim an emotional advantage, Biden evened the emotional score.

But, man, ask the woman to grapple with a substantive question and you worry she's going to hurt herself. My favorite Palin response of the night:

IFILL: What has this administration done right or wrong -- this is the great, lingering, unresolved issue, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- what have they done? And is a two-state solution the solution?

PALIN: A two-state solution is the solution. And Secretary Rice, having recently met with leaders on one side or the other there, also, still in these waning days of the Bush administration, trying to forge that peace, and that needs to be done, and that will be top of an agenda item, also, under a McCain-Palin administration.

Israel is our strongest and best ally in the Middle East. We have got to assure them that we will never allow a second Holocaust, despite, again, warnings from Iran and any other country that would seek to destroy Israel, that that is what they would like to see.

We will support Israel. A two-state solution, building our embassy, also, in Jerusalem, those things that we look forward to being able to accomplish, with this peace-seeking nation, and they have a track record of being able to forge these peace agreements.

They succeeded with Jordan. They succeeded with Egypt. I'm sure that we're going to see more success there, also.

It's got to be a commitment of the United States of America, though. And I can promise you, in a McCain-Palin administration, that commitment is there to work with our friends in Israel.

Right: Forge that peace, no second Holocaust, two-state solution, capital in Jerusalem. It's like she's just randomly spewing every talking point she's ever uploaded on Israel. (Which I'm guessing is what happened.)

Biden by contrast, hit the same question out of the park: The Bush administration legitimized Hamas by holding an election in the West Bank, then let Hezbollah fill the vacuum in Souther Lebanon by not using NATO troops. Checkmate.

I also thought Biden was brilliant at poking through Palin's tax blather, which was more or less the only thing she had to say about economics:

Look, all you have to do is go down Union Street with me in Wilmington or go to Katie's Restaurant or walk into Home Depot with me where I spend a lot of time and you ask anybody in there whether or not the economic and foreign policy of this administration has made them better off in the last eight years. And then ask them whether there's a single major initiative that John McCain differs with the president on. On taxes, on Iraq, on Afghanistan, on the whole question of how to help education, on the dealing with health care.

Just terrific stuff. It's a simple choice: Change versus more of the same. Everything else is noise.

My completely impressionistic take on Palin's performance tonight is that it mirrorred her campaign performance so far (if not quite as dramatically): When Palin started off, you thought, "Wow, she seems so fresh--so human and easy to relate to. How can we compete with that?" Then, as the debate wore on, you thought, hmm, okay, she still seems human, but not quite what I'm looking for in a vice president. And, by the end, as the vacuous answers piled up, it was more like, "Good God, keep this woman away from the oval office." Which is the story of the last month, too.

Palin just isn't a candidate who wears well over any extended period of time, whether it's a 90-minute debate or a 60-day campaign. The reason is that she only has one mode: human and relateable. That's find when the topic is middle-class pain. But there are whole classes of issues--foreign policy chief among them--where human and relateable aren't what you're looking for, even if you're an uninformed voter.

--Noam Scheiber

TNR

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renegade000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 10:57 PM by renegade000
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Palin, not so much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Palin was in total defense mode
with the sole bravura cover needed to gloss over it. SHE could have played Biden on the emotional issues early on and instead let him lead or rebut(on children in Iraq) and get the last word on issues that never ever fail to make him very emotional. She could have studied facts a lot more, but apparently her lack of awareness of anything prior to the nomination is worse than picking someone who lived at the North Pole with the penguins the past forty years.

So they did what McCain did in the last hour of his debate(though he obviously never recovered from the bailout meeting Thursday night). She got into the zone, pumping in a vaster chunk of TP's and campaign zingers than any candidate given that much time ever needed to do. It was more like the rushed presentation to the public by a primary candidate skipping the moderator questions as a time consuming nuisance. In her case, obviously, it was exuberant avoidance.

She makes the entire ticket look bad for two reasons that strangely are not her fault. First, the GOP has no substance on ANY issue they can present to the public without bold lies and distractions. Second, she was younger and snappier and yet more amateurish in her act that provided an appalling counterpoint on many levels to McCain's poor performance. Getting Ach ptooey! minijab's name right and blundering on "McClellan" shows that on any given day these sorry GOP candidates can screw the facts or make each other look bad. The age, the coherence or lack thereof, the falsity, the air punches flailing under the GOP Bush baggage together with the age factor and the certainty that the least qualified of the two losers will eventually be president too make for quite the hangover.

So she went for the twenty percenter base they need not to be a national joke(while she made rational concessions to gay rights) and performed and bluffed and ran the clock by filling it with body language and empty rhetoric where McCain slowed down the pace and staggered through a self made myth.

This leaves me with the absolute conviction, because of the absolute decision to survive the debates only, that they need fantastic horrors and risk to unsettle the situation now. The craven fear that they must feel about this risky necessity weighs more upon them than the fears we harbor for America and its people, the victims of their desperation. Decisions are being made on all GOP levels as to how far they will go and who they can protect on all levels. The meltdown is not on November 4th. It has already begun. Yet, how insanely far will they go not to go gently into the democratic night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cameozalaznick Donating Member (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC