Wait, what am I missing...

[complain jane]

I saw the clips of her past debates, which were supposed to show how she's 'formidable' and can do well in a debate.

They were idiotic. She was the same ditz, just a little less flustered in delivering her nonsensical tangents.

That's supposed to be proof she's "formidable"? AM I the only one who thinks this?

I thought she SUCKED.

[NMDemDist2]

1. shhhhhhh

you're blowing our pre game head f#@k

:hide:

[Curtland1015]

2. By "formidable", they mean "sarcastic and rude".

People love that in debates. People are idiots.

[AlCzervik]

3. she used index cards

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/6033151.html

[Blue_In_AK]

4. Apparently she was formidable enough

because she beat two very well-financed Republicans in the primaries and two good opponents in the general. I'm not sure how she pulled it off either, because I was less than impressed. I guess she just looked good after four years of Frank the Bank Murkowski.

[RichGirl]

5. I thought the same.

She was more confident and spoke better but it was all wise cracks. In one she even made fun of her opponent for knowing too much.

[dbonds]

6. Let them raise expectations all they want.

[Window]

7. You're right...she sucked big time.