Dr*dge is already explaining Palin's poor debate performance!
Apparently, because the moderator is writing a book about Obama, she's unfit for the position.
Rush Limbaugh talks about Obama; right-wing pundits write about Obama; does that mean they are biased in favor of him? This is fucking ridiculous! :mad:
I wouldn't be surprised if they replace her. In fact, if it gives the Palin supporters (those remaining) any excuses I would prefer she hand the mic to another moderator. ANY moderator will be asking basic questions that Palin will be unable to answer. But if Ifil gives them an excuse for a bad performance - Gwen, step aside and don't give them a rallying cry.
Gwen Ifill didn't act very neutral in the 2004 debate from what is being talked about now..she's said the have been disrepectful to John Edwards and gave dick cheney a pass.
And they can get rid of tom brokaw who is obviously biased against Obama and pro anything WAR.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.