Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GAO report: e-voting vendors causing problems for states

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:53 AM
Original message
GAO report: e-voting vendors causing problems for states
By Julian Sanchez | Published: September 30, 2008 - 07:10AM CT

The Government Accountability Office last week issued the results of a year-long audit of state election systems, and while the tenor of the report is broadly optimistic, it finds states reporting difficulties in a number of problem areas involving the certification and testing of new voting systems. Perhaps more troubling, however, the report notes that the "full scope of the problems that may have been experienced is not clear" because the local jurisdictions directly in charge of running the polls were generally not required to report snags, glitches, or SNAFUs to any central state authority.

The report was based on survey replies submitted by 47 states (Michigan, New Jersey, and Utah declined to respond), the District of Columbia, and several US territories over the past year, and sought to assess how well states were coping with 13 different potential "challenges" in rolling out new voting systems.

The majority of respondents reported "challenges" in five or more areas, including properly configuring voting systems, finding qualified personnel to carry out tests, securing the funds needed for adequate testing, and completing certification of machines on schedule. The single most frequently cited problem was "ensuring vendors meet requirements," with 21 states and one territory identifying "minor" challenges in this area, and another 8 states describing the difficulties as "major." In all, 16 states and territories acknowledged "major" difficulties in at least one of these areas.

While all states had established some process for approving voting systems, whether codified in statute or laid out in administrative rules, only 31 had explicit procedures in place for revoking a prior certification in light of changed circumstances or new information. In 21 states, approval and certification of voting systems was left wholly in the hands of officials at the local level, despite increasing state-level control of elections. Fewer than half conducted post-election audits in 2006 to detect problems or discrepancies.



MORE >>>>

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080930-gao-report-e-voting-vendors-causing-problems-for-states.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. So the facilitation of one of the most important pillars of our democracy are in the hands of either
amateurs...or, more likely, criminals.

This alone should be causing massive protests. But much of America is in its Rip Van Winkle, extended sleep phase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. All the more reason to use a mail in ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC