Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Debate That Should Take Place Friday Night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 06:26 PM
Original message
The Debate That Should Take Place Friday Night
The Debate That Should Take Place Friday Night
posted by John Nichols on 09/26/2008


So much self-serving spin attaches to modern presidential debates--especially since the hijacking of the organizational process by crudely-corrupt Commission on Presidential Debates--that it is almost impossible to clearly identify a winner.

Broadcast media long ago replaced serious analysis with the banter of paid partisans, all but guaranteeing that--now that John McCain has decided to participate--Republicans will mark it for McCain and Democrats will declare it for Barack Obama.

After a week of wrangling about domestic economic issues that got so intensely convoluted that the debate itself was jeopardized, the real challenge for both McCain and Obama has suddenly become one of balancing the announced theme of Friday's session--foreign policy--with the desired discussion of booms, busts and bailouts. If either candidate seems too inclined toward dialogue about Pakistan or Georgia, he will be accused of being unconscious of the current crisis. On the other hand, overly ambitious attempts to steer every answer toward talk of foreclosures and executive compensation will bring charges that the offending contender lacks the capacity for the sort of multitasking that is required of thoroughly modern presidents.

What to do?

Instead of engaging in the ridiculous conceit of having opposing candidates come up with "shared principles" for resolving the economic crisis--about which a conservative Republican and a progressive Democrat ought to disagree--McCain and Obama should agree, man-to-man, on a plan for a relevant debate.

Moderator Jim Lehrer has already signalled that economic issues will be on the table.

So why not agree to delay the necessary foreign-policy debate and go for it?

And why not adopt a format that allows for a serious discussion--as opposed to the political preening that has passed for presidential debating in recent decades.

more...

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/364766
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC