Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congratulations, You Just Purchased An Insurance Company

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:12 AM
Original message
Congratulations, You Just Purchased An Insurance Company

Congratulations, You Just Purchased An Insurance Company

by dday

Johnny, tell them what they've bought 80% of:

Fearing a financial crisis worldwide, the Federal Reserve reversed course on Tuesday and agreed to an $85 billion bailout that would give the government control of the troubled insurance giant American International Group.

The decision, only two weeks after the Treasury took over the federally chartered mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is the most radical intervention in private business in the central bank’s history.

With time running out after A.I.G. failed to get a bank loan to avoid bankruptcy, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and the Fed chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, convened a meeting with House and Senate leaders on Capitol Hill about 6:30 p.m. Tuesday to explain the rescue plan. They emerged just after 7:30 p.m. with Mr. Paulson and Mr. Bernanke looking grim, but with top lawmakers initially expressing support for the plan. But the bailout is likely to prove controversial, because it effectively puts taxpayer money at risk while protecting bad investments made by A.I.G. and other institutions it does business with.

Yes, that's right, you've got a troubled insurance giant with billions of dollars tied up in worthless pieces of paper masquerading as securities. Yours for the low low price of $85 billion dollars!

more


I hadn’t really ever thought that the Bush administration was going to wind up giving us the large scale nationalization of industry, but I’m not sure what else you call it when we follow up the deprivatization of Fannie and Freddie with the Fed securing an eighty percent stake in AIG in exchange for giant loan that the company desperately needed. With the auto industry also clamoring for bailouts we’re perhaps moving in the direction of Lenin’s New Economic Policy in which a market economy exists on small scales while the state controls the “commanding heights” of heavy industry and finance.

On a perhaps less jokey note, I’m a little surprised to learn that this is legal without some kind of legislation. It seems pretty far afield from the Fed’s traditional domain. I guess in a storm people don’t care about the niceties.

Meanwhile, these are some pretty big companies the government now owns and, among other things, this raises the question of how these companies are going to be run. There could be an effort to manage them in the broad public interest or out-of-control crony capitalism or something like the situation in present-day Russia. It seems to me that there this step has uncertain implications far beyond the world of high finance.

link


As today's decision demonstrates, this New Deal law apparently gives an extraordinarily broad authority to the Fed to "discount" notes, drafts, and bills of exchange, without limit. Recall also, unitary executive fans, that the Fed could have made this loan over the objection of the President, although in this case the Treasury supports the Fed's decision.

UPDATE: David Zaring wonders, not about the legal basis for the loan, but about the legality of the conditions the Fed is imposing on A.I.G. According to the Fed:

The interests of taxpayers are protected by key terms of the loan. The loan is collateralized by all the assets of AIG, and of its primary non-regulated subsidiaries. These assets include the stock of substantially all of the regulated subsidiaries. The loan is expected to be repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the firm’s assets. The U.S. government will receive a 79.9 percent equity interest in AIG and has the right to veto the payment of dividends to common and preferred shareholders.

Zaring asks: Loan authority, sure. But from where does the Fed get the authority to trade credit for equity? I would think that it is implicit in the statutory loan authorization that the Fed can insist on collateral in order to protect the taxpayers' interest -- and this is simply a dramatic example of such collateral, necessitated by the enormity of the loan itself. I am not at all familiar, however, with this statute or the way it has been construed and implemented for 75 years, so that's simply a guess.

link




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue Meany Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. No problem! Palin will put it on Ebay n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another example of republican corporatism
These guys believe in free enterprise like they believe in the tooth fairy.

They can let hundreds of people drown in New Orleans, but somehow they get it together to bail out their rich friends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. how is this not socialism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It is. Why do republicans hate Ronald Reagan? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. sweet! now who can we fire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. what every American needs to understand
is that this is WELFARE.

Every time rich bastards run these conglomerate corporations in the ground (and then escape with their golden parachutes), the bailout is with OUR TAX dollars. The FED = US.

Meanwhile our treasury is consumed by the friggin, never shoulda gone there Iraq war. So there's nothing left for Hurricane relief, infrastructure and things that help the very taxpayers who must bailout these bastards every single time to save the nation.

We need FDR-New Deal regulation with teeth and the corporate bastards should be stripped of their assets and thrown in jail (Guantanamo sounds about right for their ilk). PERIOD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yup,
corporate welfare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hey, can we nationalize the oil industry, too?
I mean, if we're going to be socialist, why stop at insurance? Let's take over something that will actually benefit us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damndude Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. lets sell it to news corp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC