1. ANALYSISWe had a nice break yesterday from the blizzard of state polls. Only five polls were released for four states. New Jersey and Vermont are still blue, Ohio is still red, and New York returns to the Strong blue column today. The New York poll alone cuts McCain’s very small popular vote lead in half. Obama now trails in the popular vote by a couple hundred thousand votes out of 127 million expected to be cast in November. And trading is UP today!
I dug through my rainy day box and found something interesting to share with you. I was curious to see which states currently have the biggest gaps in support for Obama regarding the demographics of age and gender. We are aware that in most states Obama has more support among young voters and female voters, so I’ve come up with two Top 10 lists to show where the gaps are the widest.
(A few words of caution … this information is not intended to locate sexism or ageism on a map. It is meant merely to show which states have more partisan support among certain demographics, and where the Obama campaign might have an opportunity to improve his message and with whom. Please don’t cry bigotry because that’s not what these lists show.)Some of these results may surprise you …
Top 10 Age Gap States (Democratic support among younger over older voters)
1. Alabama, 41.0 point difference
2. Maryland, 28.0 point difference
3. Illinois, 27.0 point difference
4. Wyoming, 25.5 point difference
5. Oklahoma, 25.0 point difference
6. South Carolina, 24.5 point difference
7. Alaska, 23.0 point difference
8. North Carolina, 21.0 point difference
9. Vermont, 20.5 point difference
10. New Hampshire, 20.0 point difference
Top 10 Gender Gap States (Democratic support among female over male voters)
1. Alabama, 19.5 point difference
2. Tennessee, 15.5 point difference
3. Wisconsin, 15.5 point difference
4. Maryland, 15.0 point difference
5. New Jersey, 14.5 point difference
6. New York, 13.0 point difference
7. Georgia, 12.5 point difference
8. Ohio, 10.5 point difference
9. North Carolina, 10.0 point difference
10. Texas, 9.5 point difference
Only three states made both Top 10 lists: Alabama, Maryland and North Carolina. I was surprised to see Illinois as the #3 age gap state, but then I remembered that Illinois used to be a red state and that’s something the older folks around here like to hold on to. Wisconsin appearing on the gender gap chart surprised me as well, and I guess that could partly explain why that state is always close in the polls.
2. NEW STATE POLLSNew Jersey
Obama 49, McCain 41 (Monmouth University, 9/14, +/- 4.0, 589 LV)
New Jersey
Obama 48, McCain 45 (Quinnipiac University, 9/14, +/- 2.8, 1187 LV)
New York
Obama 55, McCain 42 (Rasmussen, 9/15, +/- 4.5, 500 LV)
Ohio
Obama 44, McCain 48 (Public Policy Polling, 9/14, +/- 3.0, 1077 LV)
Vermont
Obama 55, McCain 36 (Research 2000, 9/13, +/- 5.0, 400 LV)
Scale:
Strong Obama (10% or greater)
Weak Obama (5% to 9%)
Lean Obama (0% to 4%)
Lean McCain (0% to 4%)
Weak McCain (5% to 9%)
Strong McCain (10% or greater)
3. ELECTORAL VOTE SNAPSHOT^ FIGURE 3a. This graph shows the daily tracking of Obama’s projected electoral votes from three sources. 270 is a majority of the electoral votes. The blue line shows daily tracking from 538.com, which projects what the outcome should be on election day. The red line shows daily tracking from Electoral-Vote.com, which shows a current snapshot of Obama’s electoral progress if the undecideds break evenly. The green line is my own projection, and it shows a current snapshot of Obama’s electoral progress if the undecideds break the same way as the swing states. A trend line is used (dashed green line) to show the average progress since May 19 and possible route for the next seven days.^ FIGURE 3b. This graph shows Obama’s green line and red line from the previous graph, and compares it to John Kerry’s 2004 progress (orange line) as shown from Electoral-Vote.com. (Both the red line and the orange line show data from Electoral-Vote.com)^ FIGURE 3c. This chart organizes all the state polls into groups categorized by how much a certain candidate is leading. “Strong” is used to indicate a candidate leading by 10 points or greater in a certain state. “Weak” is used to indicate a candidate leading between 5 and 9 points in a certain state. “Lean” is used to indicate a candidate leading between 0 and 4 points in a certain state. A total of electoral votes for each category is given at the bottom of each column.4. POPULAR VOTE SNAPSHOT^ FIGURE 4a. I am projecting 126,750,000 million votes on election day, which is the total 2004 votes plus population growth for each state. A total projected popular vote is calculated for each candidate based on projected votes on election day this year multiplied by each state’s current poll results. This graph shows the daily tracking of the popular vote calculations.5. OBAMA’S EIGHTEEN^ FIGURE 5a. The “Obama Eighteen” is the group of 18 states where the Obama campaign is concentrating much of its efforts this year. This widget shows how the candidates will do if the undecideds nationwide break the same way as the swing states. Each of the eighteen swing states are listed below the indicator’s current percentage of the total 1800 possible. The closing figures on Intrade are shown next to each state, with a column to show the change from the previous day. The scale for these is 0 to 100, with 50 being a majority. The number of electoral votes for each state is shown in the left margin, and the most recent polling for each state is shown in the far right column.^ FIGURE 5b. This graph shows the daily tracking of “Obama’s Eighteen” swing states total from the Obama’s Eighteen widget above. To show Obama’s progress in the swing states, divide the latest closing figure by 1800.^ FIGURE 5c. This graph plots all of the state polling results for Obama’s Eighteen swing states, and displays a trend line to illustrate each candidate’s progress in these states as a group.6. WIGAND ELECTORAL AVERAGE^ FIGURE 6a. The Wigand Electoral Average is our own indicator, and shows how the candidates will do if the undecideds nationwide break the same way as the swing states. Each of the twelve swing states are listed below the indicator’s current score. The closing figures on Intrade are shown next to each state, with a column to show the change from the previous day. The scale for these is 0 to 100, with 50 being a majority.^ FIGURE 6b. This graph shows the daily tracking of the swing states total from the Wigand Electoral Average widget above. To show Obama’s progress in the swing states, divide the latest closing figure by 1200.^ FIGURE 6c. Wigand vs. National Polls, RCP Average and Trading. The Wigand Electoral Average uses both poll averages and trading (swing states), and this graph compares it to the national daily tracking polls from Gallup, Rasmussen and Real Clear Politics (average), as well as the closing trading figures from Intrade (people buying shares with real money) and Rasmussen Markets (people using fake money).^ FIGURE 6d. This graph shows the daily tracking of each swing state’s closing figure on Intrade. The scale is 0 to 100 with 50 being a majority. I commonly refer to the range from 40.00 to 60.00 as “The Zone” because the states in The Zone are true swing states this year.The Wigand Electoral Average uses public polling results to determine base states for both parties and a short list of swing states, and combines the actual electoral votes from base states with a weighted Intrade calculation for electoral votes from swing states to derive an average on a scale of 0 to 100. On this scale, greater than 50.00 is considered a win for Barack Obama. An average of 50.10 would yield 270 electoral votes, and an average of 100.00 would yield 538 electoral votes. More Information 7. LINKS AND SOURCESYesterday’s WidgetFull Weekly TrackingSaturday Data DumpPast editions of THE MATHSources:
Pollster.com
FiveThirtyEight.com
Electoral-Vote.com
Intrade
Rasmussen Markets
RCP Average
RCP Latest Polls
3 Blue Dudes